payitforward wrote:CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:...why Deni is doing what he's doing...he's a damn good player.
Yup!
& improving.
& his new level of play has had a huge positive impact on the Blazers' record.
& if he was still a Wizard he'd be having the same kind of effect on our record.
& you could forget about any real shot at a top pick in the '25 draft.
& you could forget about keeping our 2026 R1 pick.
So, when you think about what we got for Deni, here's your list:
1. a solid chance at a top 3 pick in 2025.
2. we get to keep our 2026 R1 pick.
3. a chance at turning that 2026 pick into a top 3 prospect in the 2026 draft.
4. possibly a meaningfully higher R1 pick in the 2027 draft than if we hadn't made the trade.
5. Bub Carrington.
6. a R1 pick in 2029.
7. a R2 pick in 2028.
8. a R2 pick in 2030.
9. Malcolm Brogdon.
The difference with POR and WAS though is they have a coach trying to win. Everyone is trying to say that POR is tanking, but I don't think that was their plan, at the very least everyone is not on board. Hell if they hadn't got off to such a bad start, Avdija included, they would likely be at least a play in team. Now that fan base may want them to tank, that's what I've read on their forums, but I'm not sure coaching and management is aligned with that. Is that a bad strategy? Probably, but it's not an apples to apples situation. Which is a long way of saying that yes if you are trying to win Deni is a difference maker, but that's not to say you can't strategize to diminish his impact thus still being able to pull a tank. Utah is doing just that with Markkanen. I've already said it would likely take some ingenuity to do the tank right with Deni, but they could of come up with a strategy, they're paid handsomely to do so.
As for what we got, I'll reply:
1. See strategy above.
2. See strategy above.
3. Double dipping off of point 2, common PIF...
4. Well I guess we can try to stretch the impact into oblivion if you'd like.
5. A 14th pick in a bad draft, who has played up to that bad draft moniker. Not worth giving up a really good bird in hand.
6. Second best POR pick that year, likely high teens, lows 20s. Not worth giving up a really good bird in hand.
7. Margins.
8. Margins.
9. Will walk for nothing.















