ImageImageImageImageImage

Otto Porter Part 2

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,526
And1: 22,979
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1541 » by nate33 » Tue Jul 4, 2017 5:24 pm

NatP4 wrote:
nate33 wrote:Keep in mind that the cap is not projected to escalate in the next few years. Indeed, it may decline. With a flat or declining cap, and an increasing number of player signed to modern-cap-era contracts, there is likely to be much less cap room chasing free agents in 2020, 2021 and 2022. With that the case, it is pretty unlikely that Porter will find himself in a scenario where opting out will be a good move for him. A player option just isn't the incentive it would normally be.



So nate, help me understand the cap situation. We sit at 98 million after the mike Scott deal, so we need to stay below the salary cap to then re sign Otto to the max? And does Bojans 4.6 QO come off whenever he signs with another team and we decline to match?

Is the more likely scenario that we acquire a TPE for Bojan, re sign Otto, go over the cap and into the luxury tax, and then use the TMLE and a TPE? I can't see them having enough room to make any trade with the an acquired TPE to take on even more salary, AND then using the full non taxpayer MLE and still being able to re sign Otto, or can they go over the salary cap and then still re sign Otto into the lux tax??? I'm forgetting how that works from the Beal situation

We were never below the cap because, at all times, we dedicated cap holds for Otto and Bojan. Otto's cap hold is $14.7M, Bojan's is $7.8M. Those holds count when you calculate our cap number. As of right now, our cap number is $122.4M. We used our Bi-Annual Exemption on Meeks. We still have the full MLE at our disposal, though it is unlikely we will use it.

What is likely to happen is that Bojan will be renounced once someone extends a strong offer. Porter will be matched or signed to a deal of our design (probably starting at about $21M). Those two cap holds will come off the books and Porter's actual salary will go on the books. At that point, our cap number will be about $121M (plus or minus the difference between Otto's actual salary and my $21M estimate).
User avatar
keynote
General Manager
Posts: 9,422
And1: 2,624
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: Acceptance
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1542 » by keynote » Tue Jul 4, 2017 5:30 pm

SAC just signed Z-Bo and George Hill to fairly large deals. :o I assume this means that they don't have the money to offer Porter the max any more.
Always remember, my friend: the world will change again. And you may have to come back through everywhere you've been.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1543 » by NatP4 » Tue Jul 4, 2017 5:38 pm

nate33 wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
nate33 wrote:Keep in mind that the cap is not projected to escalate in the next few years. Indeed, it may decline. With a flat or declining cap, and an increasing number of player signed to modern-cap-era contracts, there is likely to be much less cap room chasing free agents in 2020, 2021 and 2022. With that the case, it is pretty unlikely that Porter will find himself in a scenario where opting out will be a good move for him. A player option just isn't the incentive it would normally be.



So nate, help me understand the cap situation. We sit at 98 million after the mike Scott deal, so we need to stay below the salary cap to then re sign Otto to the max? And does Bojans 4.6 QO come off whenever he signs with another team and we decline to match?

Is the more likely scenario that we acquire a TPE for Bojan, re sign Otto, go over the cap and into the luxury tax, and then use the TMLE and a TPE? I can't see them having enough room to make any trade with the an acquired TPE to take on even more salary, AND then using the full non taxpayer MLE and still being able to re sign Otto, or can they go over the salary cap and then still re sign Otto into the lux tax??? I'm forgetting how that works from the Beal situation

We were never below the cap because, at all times, we dedicated cap holds for Otto and Bojan. Otto's cap hold is $14.7M, Bojan's is $7.8M. Those holds count when you calculate our cap number. As of right now, our cap number is $122.4M. We used our Bi-Annual Exemption on Meeks. We still have the full MLE at our disposal, though it is unlikely we will use it.

What is likely to happen is that Bojan will be renounced once someone extends a strong offer. Porter will be matched or signed to a deal of our design (probably starting at about $21M). Those two cap holds will come off the books and Porter's actual salary will go on the books. At that point, our cap number will be about $121M (plus or minus the difference between Otto's actual salary and my $21M estimate).



So they can acquire a TPE in a Bojan sign and trade, and then use part of it to acquire Barton in exchange for a draft pick? Then still use the full 8.4 MLE to go into the luxury tax at around $132 million??

But really what you're saying is that Ernie will be cheap and not use the MLE or make a trade to take on more salary?
User avatar
keynote
General Manager
Posts: 9,422
And1: 2,624
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: Acceptance
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1544 » by keynote » Tue Jul 4, 2017 5:38 pm

Read on Twitter
Always remember, my friend: the world will change again. And you may have to come back through everywhere you've been.
User avatar
Error Afflalo
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 687
Joined: Feb 21, 2009
Location: DMV
 

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1545 » by Error Afflalo » Tue Jul 4, 2017 5:48 pm

That's a pretty big development. I guess the Nets are the main threat now.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,239
And1: 2,795
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1546 » by pcbothwel » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:11 pm

Error Afflalo wrote:That's a pretty big development. I guess the Nets are the main threat now.


Man. I dont see anyone would want any part of that Nets team for 2 years. Mozgov/Nicholson make up 22M each of the next 3 years and they have no picks.
They are going to be a bottom 3 team this year and not much better the following year. You then hope they can sign a max player to go with Otto some time in the next 3 years, but even then they are a mediocre team that is reliant on Russell breaking out.

Otto seems too cerebral/humble to take on that sort of task along with being in NY spotlight. I have to believe he gets their offer sheet and prays we then comeback with a better offer.... No way he really wants that situation.

Im trying to gauge who the 3rd team is. Philly and Kings used their cap space. Suns have Jackson and Warren, Hawks have Prince and Bazemore, Boston has Brown and Crowder, and the Mavs have Barnes.
Maybe Chicago is the sleeper team. They have space and their 4 other positions seem pretty set
User avatar
youngthegiant
Head Coach
Posts: 6,773
And1: 5,706
Joined: Aug 31, 2011
     

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1547 » by youngthegiant » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:15 pm

Any interest in a s&t with Denver??? We have Chandler, Faried, Barton, Nelson, Mudiay, Trey Lyles, Draft picks available in any max deal for Porter??
User avatar
BigA
Analyst
Posts: 3,091
And1: 999
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1548 » by BigA » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:42 pm

Would any of the teams that don't get Hayward then offer Otto?
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,099
And1: 20,562
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1549 » by dckingsfan » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:53 pm

BigA wrote:Would any of the teams that don't get Hayward then offer Otto?

Miami?
User avatar
BigA
Analyst
Posts: 3,091
And1: 999
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1550 » by BigA » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:58 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
BigA wrote:Would any of the teams that don't get Hayward then offer Otto?

Miami?

I'm having a conversation with someone discussing this board and Miami came up.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1551 » by NatP4 » Tue Jul 4, 2017 7:06 pm

youngthegiant wrote:Any interest in a s&t with Denver??? We have Chandler, Faried, Barton, Nelson, Mudiay, Trey Lyles, Draft picks available in any max deal for Porter??


Chandler, Barton, Lyles, Mudiay deal lol.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,099
And1: 20,562
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1552 » by dckingsfan » Tue Jul 4, 2017 7:51 pm

NatP4 wrote:
youngthegiant wrote:Any interest in a s&t with Denver??? We have Chandler, Faried, Barton, Nelson, Mudiay, Trey Lyles, Draft picks available in any max deal for Porter??


Chandler, Barton, Lyles, Mudiay deal lol.

Hard to make the money work. Given that we wouldn't want Faried or Arthur and Porter is near to $25M. You would basically have to gut the team, no?
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,487
And1: 2,136
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1553 » by Dark Faze » Tue Jul 4, 2017 7:53 pm

Kings are out of the Porter race.

The Nets are the only team that stands in the way of us getting a deep discount on Porter now..
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,496
And1: 2,784
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1554 » by Kanyewest » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:01 pm

BigA wrote:Would any of the teams that don't get Hayward then offer Otto?


That's certainly a possibility, for Boston and Miami.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,487
And1: 2,136
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1555 » by Dark Faze » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:05 pm

Neither team would do it. Both have much bigger talents in their sights than Otto.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,099
And1: 20,562
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1556 » by dckingsfan » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:09 pm

Dark Faze wrote:Neither team would do it. Both have much bigger talents in their sights than Otto.

Hoping you are right... but worried that Kanyewest is right.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,496
And1: 2,784
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1557 » by Kanyewest » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:09 pm

Dark Faze wrote:Neither team would do it. Both have much bigger talents in their sights than Otto.


Perhaps Boston and/or Miami want to hold onto their cap space in the summer of 2018 but as it stands right now, Porter is the 2nd best free agent remaining.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1558 » by verbal8 » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:12 pm

Dark Faze wrote:Neither team would do it. Both have much bigger talents in their sights than Otto.

I could see Miami making an offer on Porter with Hayward likely going to Boston.

The Nets also seem likely to have serious interest.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,487
And1: 2,136
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1559 » by Dark Faze » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:19 pm

I think its suspect that we haven't seen a report yet about the Nets actually submitting an offer sheet. Feel as though they'd have done it by now.

With Hayward and Durant having both recently gotten meetings with Miami--it's clear they are a premier destination for free agents. Pat Riley is too ambitious, he will not waste time offering anything for Otto. Heat came on late last year as well--if they'd of gotten it together five games sooner they might have upset the Celtics in the first round.
User avatar
youngthegiant
Head Coach
Posts: 6,773
And1: 5,706
Joined: Aug 31, 2011
     

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1560 » by youngthegiant » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:32 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
youngthegiant wrote:Any interest in a s&t with Denver??? We have Chandler, Faried, Barton, Nelson, Mudiay, Trey Lyles, Draft picks available in any max deal for Porter??


Chandler, Barton, Lyles, Mudiay deal lol.

Hard to make the money work. Given that we wouldn't want Faried or Arthur and Porter is near to $25M. You would basically have to gut the team, no?
Maybe ship Faried to a Third team, Chandler, Barton, Lyles to Washington. Porter to Denver, Faried to a third team.

Return to Washington Wizards