willbcocks wrote:Orlando has a lot of good prospects with high floors. They really need a couple of those guys to break out and become stars. Kinda like the Boston Celtics, only with better prospects and a worse coach.
It always depresses me when I see a team with so many assets. They have 7 decent young players/prospects. We tanked almost as long as they did, and have 4. EG really did a poor job of building depth for the future.
I was reflecting last night watching the game on Skile's time with the Bullets during th
Webber/Howard era. It's kinda ironic that Skiles' rep is as a defensive minded coach
and a faulty memory that he was a good defensive player. He may have wished he
was a good defensive player but he couldn't stay in front of opp PGs and was too
small to guard any other position. Amazing passer though.
Re the game
We pulled that one out of our rear ends. Sign of a good team? We'll see. Hope so.
ORL was playing pretty fierce D after the first Q denying everything we wanted
to do.
Our only big worth a darn was Tat. Obviously Nene and Gooden stunk.
OP with a +19 or some such even though he didn't shoot well. I was struck by
a couple a sequences where he just made plays in a variety of ways. If this
keeps up he'll be a great asset and compliment to Wall and Beal.
FTs, ugh. Although it's funny the TV studio guys on Comcast talked about
how crucial it was. As we've heard previously from the Stat guys, FTs (or FT%)
are actually rarely determinative in the outcome. So yeah, we shot poorly
but no, it didn't change who got the W.