gambitx777 wrote:Simmons only value is the value he has to the team trading for him. He has no value to the sixers cuz I don't think he's coming back.GutUNC wrote:gambitx777 wrote:Yeah but if you understand the reality of the situation. Ben Simmons is more or less a trade exception at this point. You can argue his value and blah blah blah, but he has not player value to the 76ers if he's never coming back, which he isn't. Anyone trying to say he might is silly. You don't burn 19 mill in your back yard and wake up one day and go yeah I'll go back lol. What they have PG wise is what they have. Beal is a pretty good upgrade for them. He can do a lot of things for them. Maxy/curry/shake are good enough at PG that is they add enough fire power next to embid they can go win a tittle. They have an MVP caliber player right now with a border line all-star on the team in Harris, like the trade I posted where they get Beal and grant who stops that team in the east? I'm just saying the bucks last year said **** the BS, let make any trade at all to win a tittle and they did. DM needs to stop worrying about 3-4 years from now and **** the BS and go after a ring right now!
Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
1) You have the right to think that Simmons value is that of a trade exception, but that's not the opinion of someone who's going to negotiate a successful trade for him.
2) My response was to the person who said the price would be Simmons/Maxey/1st so the question is whether Shake/Curry is good enough, which is a resounding "no".
And he does have value he can if he desires to be, a useful and very good player.
I don't think the 76ers hspuld trade Maxy at all. He's young on the rise and is under team control more or less for a good long while. You don't move that. He's a piece, not an asset at this point.
Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
Right, but if you're a GM who thinks Simmons' value is "a trade exception", you're not picking up and calling Morey about him.
And claiming he has no value to the Sixers is either being obtuse or not understanding how market valuation works. Yes, they're currently getting no on-court value for him, but that doesn't mean that trading him for a 10th man represents a positive change for the Sixers, considering the opportunity cost lost. The delta between "anything" and what Simmons value if he hadn't put himself in this predicament is the obvious gaping delta to solve.



























