

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
gtn130 wrote:Like why are automatic weapons banned? Isn't that alone quite an admission of something? Why were guns banned at the RNC in 2016?
People argue in bad faith!
nate33 wrote:Doug_Blew wrote:nate33 wrote: Gun deaths is not a useful category. Of course there will be fewer gun deaths if there are no guns available.
What am i missing here? Dont we want fewer gun deaths?
I thought the pro-gun argument was that if there were no guns, then the bad guys would shoot everyone up because they dont follow the law.
People want fewer homicides, period. When articles use "gun deaths" it's because they're trying to include gun-related suicides into violent crime stats to make the data look a lot worse.
There is no correlation between gun ownership and overall suicide rate. People in countries where guns are rare merely kill themselves by other means. The U.S. for example, has a lower suicide rate than most Western European countries.
Consider two countries with identical suicide rates and identical homicide rates. One country has high gun ownership, the other has low gun ownership. The high ownership gun country would have more of their suicides attributable to guns. Therefore, that data would show the country with more guns would have higher "gun related deaths" even though each country is identical in homicides and suicides. It artificially makes the presence of guns seem more dangerous.
There are on average nearly 11 murder-suicides a week in America, according to a new study by my organization, the Violence Policy Center. We estimate that more than 1,200 Americans die in murder-suicides each year. Nine out of 10 of these incidents involve a gun, and 72 percent involve an intimate partner.Nov 3, 2015
Kanyewest wrote:Mapping the Overlap As these maps show, the correlation between guns and suicide is strong but inexact, since both are influenced by poverty, population density, and crime. The nine states that rank lowest in terms of gun prevalence are the very same nine that rank lowest for suicide rates. Similarly, the three states top-ranked for gun prevalence can be found among the four states ranking highest for suicide rates.
nate33 wrote:I could probably be talked into backing more restrictions on semi-automatic weapons. It would allow hunters to still get hunting rifles, and it would allow homeowners to defend their property with a shot gun, but might eliminate the horrifically efficient mass-shootings we see far too often.
nate33 wrote:I_Like_Dirt wrote:nate33 wrote:The concept you are overlooking here is deterrence. There's a reason why there are so many school shootings and nearly as many mall shootings or town festival shootings.
Bad guys know that everyone in a school is a sitting duck. Just the possibility that there are two or three teachers who are trained and armed may prevent a shooting from happening in the first place.
But, I mean, given gun ownership rates, they already don't know if some random person on the streets or in the mall or at a festival or whatever is going to have a guy, and it's a reasonable bet that one of them does. Other countries don't even have that level of disincentive and still don't have the same issues to the point where they're considering even greater "deterrence."
And there are other logistical issues, particularly where school shootings happen. For one, even on the ridiculous notion of somehow preventing a shooting with a gun, that gun has to be easily accessible given the nature and spontaneity of said shootings. If the teacher has to go to another room and unlock a safe or something, it becomes entirely beside the point, and if it's accessible, the potential for accidents far outweighs any potential to stop someone who's decided to go on a shooting spree in the first place from doing so just because they might get shot, as though that thought hadn't dawned on them previously or they aren't mentally ill and don't care. And beyond that, it would be basically impossible to keep which teachers had guns or access to guns quiet. Given that the shooters are generally students or former students, they would know and would go for those people first.
Ultimately, this is all just avoiding the obvious choice, or rather making the choice by pretending like there is a third choice when there actually isn't. You either are interested in trying to stop these kinds of shootings, or you are willing to suffer such atrocities in order to keep your guns. And let's be honest, the time to overthrow the government is a thing of the past. Drones, airplanes and modern military techniques make that impossible. We just went through a period where a large portion of the population thought the president was the antichrist or something awful, followed by a period where a large portion of the population thinks the current president is some variation of Hitler. If the government was going to be overthrown, it would have happened by now.
I don't really disagree much with this. I'm saying if that you want to use gun control as your method to reduce homicides, you need to go all the way. We need to get guns in the country down to zero. Half-measures are likely to make things worse because they take guns from the law abiding, not the criminals.
And getting our gun rate down to zero isn't gonna happen.
I know everyone is frustrated. I understand the desire to "DO SOMETHING". But if that "something" is going to make things worse, then it is better to do nothing. We have data on this stuff. Gun control in America, wherever it has been tried, has not proven to be effective. Look at DC and Chicago as case studies.
Kanyewest wrote:Mapping the Overlap As these maps show, the correlation between guns and suicide is strong but inexact, since both are influenced by poverty, population density, and crime. The nine states that rank lowest in terms of gun prevalence are the very same nine that rank lowest for suicide rates. Similarly, the three states top-ranked for gun prevalence can be found among the four states ranking highest for suicide rates.
nate33 wrote:Kanyewest wrote:Mapping the Overlap As these maps show, the correlation between guns and suicide is strong but inexact, since both are influenced by poverty, population density, and crime. The nine states that rank lowest in terms of gun prevalence are the very same nine that rank lowest for suicide rates. Similarly, the three states top-ranked for gun prevalence can be found among the four states ranking highest for suicide rates.
Yes. Good stuff. Suicides are dicey because there are several other factors. One in particular is race. Native Americans have very high suicide rates and whites have pretty high rates. Blacks and Hispanics have very low suicide rates.
The high Native American suicide rate is definitely a factor in the western states and Alaska.
nate33 wrote:Kanyewest wrote:Mapping the Overlap As these maps show, the correlation between guns and suicide is strong but inexact, since both are influenced by poverty, population density, and crime. The nine states that rank lowest in terms of gun prevalence are the very same nine that rank lowest for suicide rates. Similarly, the three states top-ranked for gun prevalence can be found among the four states ranking highest for suicide rates.
Yes. Good stuff. Suicides are dicey because there are several other factors. One in particular is race. Native Americans have very high suicide rates and whites have pretty high rates. Blacks and Hispanics have very low suicide rates.
The high Native American suicide rate is definitely a factor in the western states and Alaska.
stilldropin20 wrote:Trump just read my mind. pay the teachers doubling as security guards a bonus. weather they be the janitor, lunch attendant , or a teacher principal whichever. if they qualify to also be a security guard then they get a little pay raise 5-10 K per year.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
stilldropin20 wrote:Trump just read my mind. pay the teachers doubling as security guards a bonus. weather they be the janitor, lunch attendant , or a teacher principal whichever. if they qualify to also be a security guard then they get a little pay raise 5-10 K per year.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
queridiculo wrote::lol: why am I not surprised that the answer to this issue is going to be more weapons and more police.
I don't want either to be anywhere near a place of learning.
Doug_Blew wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:Trump just read my mind. pay the teachers doubling as security guards a bonus. weather they be the janitor, lunch attendant , or a teacher principal whichever. if they qualify to also be a security guard then they get a little pay raise 5-10 K per year.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Just to add to this thought. We could pay some of the older 18 year old students to carry a concealed weapon ...provided that they pass a background check. This way our schools are being protected and you wouldn't have to pay the 18 year old as much as you would have to pay the janitor.
Wray was responding to questions from Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who called Confucius Institutes “complicit” in China’s larger efforts “to covertly influence public opinion.” Earlier this month, Rubio sent a letter to Florida schools, urging them to shut down their Confucius Institutes.
I spent a year and a half studying Confucius Institutes. I found they misled students about China’s history and pressured American scholars to keep quiet about China’s unsavory policies. The Chinese director of one Institute told me that if a student asked about Tiananmen Square, she would “show a picture and point out the beautiful architecture.”
queridiculo wrote::lol: why am I not surprised that the answer to this issue is going to be more weapons and more police.
I don't want either to be anywhere near a place of learning.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.