Dat2U wrote:payitforward wrote:Dat2U wrote:I'd happily give up Gortat, Oubre & (2) 1st round picks for Cousins and drive 'em to the airport. This isn't about keeping chemistry to make an Eastern Conference Finals run. I want to make a legitimate run at winning a Championship. Wall, Beal, Porter & Cousins gives you that opportunity.
Well, it had better enable "a legitimate run" immediately. Because, at least at first glance, in some other ways it looks like it would leave us in a difficult position.
We'd have @ $80m in 4 players next year -- Beal, Porter (maxed), Wall & Cousins. Plus @ $23m in Morris, Smith, Satoransky & Nicholson. How much help that 2d group delivers is at least open to question. We'd have no one on a rookie contract & no picks for a couple of years.
In essence, for the delta you see between Gortat & Cousins, we'd have given up Oubre & 2 R1 picks, & we'd have taken on a potentially problematic salary situation.
Cousins is a tremendous talent -- no one would argue with that. If he put up numbers that reflected that talent I'd be in favor of this deal. As it is, I'd view it as a tremendous risk.
Well your view on Cousins' impact as a player in the past has differed greatly than mine. I see him as one of the best Cs in the game. You don't. So we're not likely to see eye to eye on this. However I believe you can have an elite championship quality team if you have 4-5 guys playing at a really high level and a non-descript bench. Some of those Kobe/Shaq teams were incredibly top heavy. I think a good comparison for us with Cousins would be Boston with the big 3 of KG, Pierce & Allen. The Lakers with Kobe & Gasol weren't very deep. Ditto for the Heat team with Wade & Shaq.
Note that i forgot Mahinmi! Make that $96m for 5 players, & just under $120m for 9.

We don't have to see eye to eye on Cousins. But of course I agree that he is enormously talented -- one of a handful of the most talented players in the league. I'd probably have drafted him over Wall in 2010.
But he doesn't play to the level of his talent. Or, to put it differently, he doesn't discipline his talent to get the most out of it.
Comparing him to Gortat, lets look at their effect on possessions -- i.e. offensive rebounds, steals & turnovers. Gortat is plus 3.1 vs. Cousins every 48 minutes of PT. Your team has fewer chances to score.
Of course, it's always possible to say, & in fact it's true, that some of that comes because Cousins has the ball in his hands so much; Gortat doesn't. Is he not going to have the ball in his hands if he plays here? If so, then it's even worse b/c the ball is in his hands instead of Wall, Beal or Porter -- our 3 most productive & efficient players. That doesn't make us better. If not, then you won't be seeing all those things you like about him on offense.
But... I've beat this horse to death a dozen times -- poor nag!

I can make my point in a simpler way. A great player is one that makes a big difference in the win-loss record of his team. When LeBron left Cleveland, the team went from 61 wins to 19 wins. When he returned to Cleveland the team went from 33 wins to 53 wins. When he left Miami, the Heat went from 54 to 37 wins.
The Kings won 25 games in 2009-10. Cousins joined them, & they've won 24, 22, 28, 29, 29 & 34 in the years he's been there. Yes, their FO is a train wreck, but that's still enough data for me.