ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XXI

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,477
And1: 9,987
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1681 » by penbeast0 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:46 pm

dckingsfan wrote:.... Revamp the education system from the ground up. Don't make it time based but knowledge based. Instead of high school diplomas finish with AA degrees. The biggest pushback here will come from public unions.

Example: The EU's outcomes on patient care isn't as good as the US and the only difference in risk factors in the US is obesity. We could put in a single payer system that is outcome based and not use based with a focus on preventative care. The biggest pushback here will come from the most powerful union, the AMA.

We don't have to change our work ethics to improve our outdated social programs.


I am curious what these would look like. A "knowledge based" educational system . . . is there a set and static body of knowledge you have to have and do you group students by knowledge when they are growing up? How do you deal with underpriviledged or ELL kids who don't have the same knowledge base? Do you have the same kind of massive multiple choice based testing that is such a problem now to determine it?

In terms of outcome based medicine, how do you do it? Single payer so no cost for "extra care," so who determines how much preventative care and how much is mandatory or optional? Do you have a solution for the issue of "half the cost of medicine is backloaded into the last year of life?" For doctors and hospitals setting policy based on malpractice liability? Do you allow experimentation and new treatments and where are the incentives for them?

This is just off the top of my head but those seem to be the type of questions that just automatically leap to mind when talking about a massive systemic change. . . not to say you are wrong, it's just that it needs to be much more clearly laid out before judgements can be made about whether it is an improvement or a potential disaster waiting to happen.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1682 » by stilldropin20 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 5:27 pm

GhostofChenier wrote:Image



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

OMG laughing my butt off!!! Just spit out my coffee!!
like i said, its a full rebuild.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,853
And1: 20,398
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1683 » by dckingsfan » Mon Aug 13, 2018 5:44 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:.... Revamp the education system from the ground up. Don't make it time based but knowledge based. Instead of high school diplomas finish with AA degrees. The biggest pushback here will come from public unions.

Example: The EU's outcomes on patient care isn't as good as the US and the only difference in risk factors in the US is obesity. We could put in a single payer system that is outcome based and not use based with a focus on preventative care. The biggest pushback here will come from the most powerful union, the AMA.

We don't have to change our work ethics to improve our outdated social programs.

I am curious what these would look like. A "knowledge based" educational system . . . is there a set and static body of knowledge you have to have and do you group students by knowledge when they are growing up? How do you deal with underpriviledged or ELL kids who don't have the same knowledge base? Do you have the same kind of massive multiple choice based testing that is such a problem now to determine it?

In terms of outcome based medicine, how do you do it? Single payer so no cost for "extra care," so who determines how much preventative care and how much is mandatory or optional? Do you have a solution for the issue of "half the cost of medicine is backloaded into the last year of life?" For doctors and hospitals setting policy based on malpractice liability? Do you allow experimentation and new treatments and where are the incentives for them?

This is just off the top of my head but those seem to be the type of questions that just automatically leap to mind when talking about a massive systemic change. . . not to say you are wrong, it's just that it needs to be much more clearly laid out before judgements can be made about whether it is an improvement or a potential disaster waiting to happen.

Knowledge base education is about progression... it allows each learner to get where they need to be on at their rate of learning.

And yes to the questions that you ask about healthcare and what drives me crazy about those that say they will just roll a single payer solution out. Add to those questions how do you reduce the cost of labor or increase productivity of the labor?

My post was more - if we are going to revamp our social systems - then really revamp them - no more stupid ACA type of legislation.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,853
And1: 20,398
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1684 » by dckingsfan » Mon Aug 13, 2018 5:47 pm

Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:ooops…
https://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2018-08-10/us-budget-deficit-totals-769-billion-in-july

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/promise/1418/eliminate-federal-debt-8-years/
"We’ve got to get rid of the $19 trillion in debt. ... Well, I would say over a period of eight years. And I’ll tell you why.”

How bout we lower taxes on the rich, build an enormously expensive wall between us and Mexico, and create a situation where we have to bail out farmers! Brilliant by any standard - just ask your dentist when he's got his hands in your mouth and won't stop talking. We could print more dollars, but timber's recently double in price.

Yeah, time to switch Administrations - this one isn't getting it done.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1685 » by stilldropin20 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:03 pm

closg00 wrote:Peter Strzok fired, the 3rd person involved with the Trump investigation fired, nothing political about this at all.


FBI and DOJ has been slow walking and stone walling congress for 1.5 years.

non partisan: i think the FBI feels it has to protect what it feels is "their" investigation then after they are done with it allow for oversight. I'm not sure that this is the way it works or should work. I feel personally feel that congress (AKA the american people) should have real time oversight.

Comey clearly took it out of the presidents hands and Comey's hands are clearly dirty.

Right now, the only evidence anyone has anywhere on collusion or conspiracy is the meeting that they took at trump tower and the "russia, if you are listening" speech at a campaign rally. There is no evidence anywhere of a quid pro quo so no crime and in fact Trump has been harder and stiffer with sanctions on russia than any president since 1991. So as the now fired Strzok once said, there's just no there there. Nothing.

Could the Trump team have been informed that russia had dirt? absolutely? Could trump foolishly said russia if you're listening?" Absolutely. Is any of that a crime or conspiracy? Nope. Does it make trump look bad politically? Yes.

And this is what ive said for over 2 years. I dont know why the trump team walked into this clear trap. Those same russian lawyers met with Fusion GPS the day before and the day after the trump tower meeting. Classic set up. Dossier then compiled. Dossier used to obtain FISA on page. the entire Trump team was surveilled. Entire trump team was unmaksed. All by Obama. Everyone knows this came from Obama. You would have to be an idiot to not realize that these folks would not stick their necks out so far given Trump just won the election without having "cover." They all thought that they would have Trump removed before summer 2017.

And now we find ourselves with a DOJ and FBI trying to cover their tracks on this entire thing...before they turn it over to congress for complete oversight...and their thinking is that so long as D's regain the house, the FBI and Obama DOJ will be let off of the hook...at most a slap on the wrist.

The fact that mccabe, Strzok, and Comey all have been fired with cause is alarming. At the end of the day we have a DNC that didn't secure it's servers (and some personal emails), possibly got hacked(possibly an inside job according to wiki leaks who say it came from a flash drive), supposedly by russians, who then released the info to wiki leaks, who simply put the info out there for all to read....... I mean...come on...maybe the DNC should have better secured servers? Not used private emails?

And since the trump team never paid for these emails, nor offered anything of value, and in fact have hit russia extremely hard with sanctions...there just is nothing there to tie this to trump other than they (possibly) heard there was dirt on a political opponent, and trump said, tongue in cheek in broad day light said "release the" dirt.

Meanwhile, simultaneously the grab em by the p***** tape got released. and the emails got released a a few hours later.

At the end of the day, you have both barrack obama paying perkins coie $1M in 2016. and HRC paying perkins coie $10M in 2016. Perkins Coie creates somewhat of a legal firewall for both of them as they then paid fusion GPS for political dirt on Trump. Fusion pays steele who pays Actual russian government employees and oligarchs for a lot of the dirt that ends up in the Dossier. That dossier is used to survail americans. the dossier remains almost entirely unverified by the FBI. The FISA court was purposefully misled that info based on political dirt (oppo research).

And it looks like Key officials at the top of the Obama DOJ were both the tip of this spear and the spear itself as well as the driving force for the spear.

Nate and I have been saying that this whole thing stinks to high heaven. And I can see why both sides of the political aisle would be upset. But clearly the Dems(HRC, Obama admin) were the one dealing from the bottom of the deck and colluding with each other at the table. Trump was just a better poker player but exposed himself along the way. and stumbled on his way to the bank and dropped a bunch of poker chips.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,547
And1: 4,494
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1686 » by closg00 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:12 pm

verbal8 wrote:
closg00 wrote:Peter Strzok fired, the 3rd person involved with the Trump investigation fired, nothing political about this at all.


It does seem fishy that there was a discipline recommendation - 60-day suspension and demotion - that was overruled and he was terminated.


This is perfect for The disinformation campaign, when Mueller pushes for the interview or issues his factual findings, Republicans have the narrative script ready to go.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1687 » by stilldropin20 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:31 pm

Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:ooops…
https://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2018-08-10/us-budget-deficit-totals-769-billion-in-july

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/promise/1418/eliminate-federal-debt-8-years/
"We’ve got to get rid of the $19 trillion in debt. ... Well, I would say over a period of eight years. And I’ll tell you why.”

How bout we lower taxes on the rich, build an enormously expensive wall between us and Mexico, and create a situation where we have to bail out farmers! Brilliant by any standard - just ask your dentist when he's got his hands in your mouth and won't stop talking. We could print more dollars, but timber's recently double in price.


Re tax reductions:

Corporate reduction repatriated trillions. 10-21% of trillions is "more better" than 38% of nothing. But if you still want to whine and cry about 38% of nothing that we lost how about we make a bet?

April 15th is about 10 months away. lets see what the gross tax receipts end up being for 2018 compared to 2017.

I'll make you a bet. If 2017 gross tax receipts are higher i'll buy you a steak dinner for 2...send you a gift certificate $150.00. If 2018 gross tax receipts are higher you send me a $150.00 gift certificate.

as for timber doubling? big deal. Timber is the least costly construction expense. Just so you guys know, you can frame a 2 story 4 BR, 4BA 3000sf house with a 4 man crew on 5 days or less of labor $8k in total costs 2012. $10K in 2016(labor went up as everyone get back to work). and $11K last month. I just framed one last month. FTR, we can (generally) no longer frame exterior with 2x4 in chicago and now use 2x6 both for LEED cert and use of dryvit(cement board) exterior with excessive floor to ceiling windows that are en vogue. so a big part of the increase is use of bigger timber. and really supply and demand. costs were similar in 2006. about $10K. Costs went down 20% in 2009-2013 due to housing/mortgage crisis.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,345
And1: 11,540
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1688 » by Wizardspride » Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:17 pm

Gallup & Rasssmussen are considered "right leaning" so this is definitely not a good thing for Trump.

Read on Twitter
?s=19

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
User avatar
zero2hero
Senior
Posts: 633
And1: 487
Joined: Jan 06, 2011
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1689 » by zero2hero » Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:23 pm

Wizardspride wrote:Gallup & Rasssmussen are considered "right leaning" so this is definitely not a good thing for Trump.

Read on Twitter
?s=19


I wouldn't put Gallup and Rasmussen in the same sentence at all, lol.

538's aggregation has him at 41%. Trump does have a "secret weapon" coming up soon that has been a ratings hit for him: slamming NFL protests.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,345
And1: 11,540
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1690 » by Wizardspride » Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:32 pm

zero2hero wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:Gallup & Rasssmussen are considered "right leaning" so this is definitely not a good thing for Trump.

Read on Twitter
?s=19


I wouldn't put Gallup and Rasmussen in the same sentence at all, lol.

538's aggregation has him at 41%. Trump does have a "secret weapon" coming up soon that has been a ratings hit for him: slamming NFL protests.

"Slamming black people". :wink:

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,547
And1: 4,494
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1691 » by closg00 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:08 am

Why does MSNBC continue to employee Al Sharpton? I am embarrassed for him whenever he appears on a segment.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1692 » by pancakes3 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:35 am

Bullets -> Wizards
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,853
And1: 20,398
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1693 » by dckingsfan » Tue Aug 14, 2018 1:12 am



Immigration reform is a complex issue that will require compassion and wisdom to bring the nation to a just solution, but the politicians who have based their political and professional identity on ethnic demonization and exclusion cannot be trusted to do so.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1694 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:58 am

Read on Twitter


Most shamelessly corrupt administration ever
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,810
And1: 7,934
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1695 » by montestewart » Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:22 am

GhostofChenier wrote:Image

OK GOC, don't let it go to your head, but that one was pretty funny
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1696 » by verbal8 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:14 am

zero2hero wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:Gallup & Rasssmussen are considered "right leaning" so this is definitely not a good thing for Trump.

Read on Twitter
?s=19


I wouldn't put Gallup and Rasmussen in the same sentence at all, lol.

538's aggregation has him at 41%. Trump does have a "secret weapon" coming up soon that has been a ratings hit for him: slamming NFL protests.


I think the NFL protests are a loser for Republicans even if they excite Trump's base. Going from 65 to 75% in some deep red district does nothing for them in the midterms. I think the longer the protest remain in the news, the less favorable it is to swing voters. One fact likely to be revealed during prolonged discussions is that kneeling was chosen to be respectful of the anthem and make a statement. Also it reveals Trump as a bully.

If I was a Democratic candidate I would attack Trump on the broader point of government interference with private enterprise. I would attack the tariffs as the taxes that hurt US factory workers and farmers. I think these are 2 issues where Trump is really vulnerable to the moderate(even right leaning) voter. Also these are areas where clearly Congress has not acted to rein him in.
User avatar
zero2hero
Senior
Posts: 633
And1: 487
Joined: Jan 06, 2011
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1697 » by zero2hero » Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:25 pm

verbal8 wrote:
I think the NFL protests are a loser for Republicans even if they excite Trump's base. Going from 65 to 75% in some deep red district does nothing for them in the midterms. I think the longer the protest remain in the news, the less favorable it is to swing voters. One fact likely to be revealed during prolonged discussions is that kneeling was chosen to be respectful of the anthem and make a statement. Also it reveals Trump as a bully.

If I was a Democratic candidate I would attack Trump on the broader point of government interference with private enterprise. I would attack the tariffs as the taxes that hurt US factory workers and farmers. I think these are 2 issues where Trump is really vulnerable to the moderate(even right leaning) voter. Also these are areas where clearly Congress has not acted to rein him in.


Very true, which is why I only mentioned the criticism in regards to his approval rating. Midterms voters are generally local issue voters - this Anti Trump wave does have the potentially to increase turnout however.

Tariffs are definitely an good attack area to target/sway the more actual true fiscal/libertarian conservatives. Dems gotta be concise on their messaging though - I remember a couple of weeks ago they spent weeks flip flopping between whether or not they should get rid of vs reform ICE. With the former being politically untenable IMO. Gotta do better
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,853
And1: 20,398
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1698 » by dckingsfan » Tue Aug 14, 2018 1:09 pm

zero2hero wrote:
verbal8 wrote:
I think the NFL protests are a loser for Republicans even if they excite Trump's base. Going from 65 to 75% in some deep red district does nothing for them in the midterms. I think the longer the protest remain in the news, the less favorable it is to swing voters. One fact likely to be revealed during prolonged discussions is that kneeling was chosen to be respectful of the anthem and make a statement. Also it reveals Trump as a bully.

If I was a Democratic candidate I would attack Trump on the broader point of government interference with private enterprise. I would attack the tariffs as the taxes that hurt US factory workers and farmers. I think these are 2 issues where Trump is really vulnerable to the moderate(even right leaning) voter. Also these are areas where clearly Congress has not acted to rein him in.


Very true, which is why I only mentioned the criticism in regards to his approval rating. Midterms voters are generally local issue voters - this Anti Trump wave does have the potentially to increase turnout however.

Tariffs are definitely an good attack area to target/sway the more actual true fiscal/libertarianconservatives. Dems gotta be concise on their messaging though - I remember a couple of weeks ago they spent weeks flip flopping between whether or not they should get rid of vs reform ICE. With the former being politically untenable IMO. Gotta do better

And fiscal conservatives see it as ridiculous to fight a multi-front tariff war.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,345
And1: 11,540
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1699 » by Wizardspride » Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:20 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=19

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,304
And1: 7,403
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI 

Post#1700 » by FAH1223 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:33 pm

Wizardspride wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=19


Read on Twitter
Image

Return to Washington Wizards