Political Roundtable Part X

AFM · Post #1741 » by **AFM** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:13 pm

Word on the street is Hillary has been grabbing Huma by the pussy for years...why you think Carlos Danger be walking the streets

Induveca · Post #1742 » by **Induveca** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:26 pm

JWizmentality wrote:
fishercob wrote:
montestewart wrote:So he's a prospectophile?

Like Chad Ford and Jonathon Givony!

Grab em by the pu...pu.....potential!

Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using Tapatalk

AFM · Post #1743 » by **AFM** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:39 pm

Will Trump be endorsed by NAMBLA?

http://www.nambla.org/

Don't ask me how I know of them...

JWizmentality · Post #1744 » by **JWizmentality** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:43 pm

AFM wrote:Word on the street is Hillary has been grabbing Huma by the pussy for years...why you think Carlos Danger be walking the streets

You know, of all the leaks. I would find that the most believable.

Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using Tapatalk

Post #1745 » by **LyricalRico** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:53 pm

AFM wrote:Will Trump be endorsed by NAMBLA?

http://www.nambla.org/

Don't ask me how I know of them...

Just say you saw it on South Park and thought it had something to do with Marlon Brando.

AFM · Post #1746 » by **AFM** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:11 pm

JWizmentality wrote:
AFM wrote:Word on the street is Hillary has been grabbing Huma by the pussy for years...why you think Carlos Danger be walking the streets

You know, of all the leaks. I would find that the most believable.

Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using Tapatalk

Hey, rumors have been out there for years. Totally explains both Carlos Danger and Willie "Rape Errybody I meet" Clinton.

AFM · Post #1747 » by **AFM** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:12 pm

Post #1748 » by **bondom34** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:40 pm

Read on Twitter

Well Curt Schilling is here to save the day!

Wizardspride · Post #1749 » by **Wizardspride** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 11:50 pm

Read on Twitter

closg00 · Post #1750 » by **closg00** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:00 am

Induveca wrote:

And 1200 more Podesta emails released today.

Trump and the Republicans have no issue with a foreign power actively trying to influence the election, as-long as they are supporting the Republican candidate. What a disgrace that their leadership has not condemned this blatant interference.

closg00 · Post #1751 » by **closg00** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:02 am

AFM wrote:

Can you imagine what the Trump campaigns private emails look like? Oh-boy.

Wizardspride · Post #1752 » by **Wizardspride** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 2:47 am

OMG.

Read on Twitter

Post #1753 » by **montestewart** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 11:45 am

Trump's really going to counter the allegations with a "Come on, look at them! Seriously?" defense.

I'm guessing there is a very large number of women who are unattractive in the eyes of men like Trump and have been subject to sexual assault or sexual harassment or unwanted sexual attention from men like Trump. For some reason, some of them are still thinking of voting for Trump. He's trying to alienate as many of them as he can.

Eventually, his wife and daughters may turn on him.

closg00 · Post #1754 » by **closg00** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 2:32 pm

montestewart wrote:Trump's really going to counter the allegations with a "Come on, look at them! Seriously?" defense.

I'm guessing there is a very large number of women who are unattractive in the eyes of men like Trump and have been subject to sexual assault or sexual harassment or unwanted sexual attention from men like Trump. For some reason, some of them are still thinking of voting for Trump. He's trying to alienate as many of them as he can.

Eventually, his wife and daughters may turn on him.

The "look at them" defense works with his stupid followers because they aren't smart enough consider how these woman looked 20-30 years ago when they were in their prime. Trump admits to what he does in his Access Hollywood tape and it is being confirmed by scores of women.

dobrojim · Post #1755 » by **dobrojim** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 2:53 pm

somewhat hesitant to fall off my self imposed wagon and to post -
but my impulse control or lack thereof is not an issue in
my campaign so here goes.

Many months ago I predicted that the longer DJT remained in the race,
the better the chances were for the Dem nominee, presumed correctly
at the time to be HRC.

Not saying this proves much of anything (about me).

That said, it has been satisfying and a bit of a relief to see so many
traditionally conservative newspapers many of which NEVER endorsed a dem
come out for HRC (not that I think she's the cat's meow).
But there is an arguably affirmative case to be made on her behalf
(as the WaPo did today) that many of these papers agreed on in endorsing her
candidacy. The same clearly can NOT be said about her rival.

back to lurk mode

Post #1756 » by **montestewart** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 3:15 pm

dobrojim wrote:somewhat hesitant to fall off my self imposed wagon and to post -
but my impulse control or lack thereof is not an issue in
my campaign so here goes.

Many months ago I predicted that the longer DJT remained in the race,
the better the chances were for the Dem nominee, presumed correctly
at the time to be HRC.

Not saying this proves much of anything (about me).

That said, it has been satisfying and a bit of a relief to see so many
traditionally conservative newspapers many of which NEVER endorsed a dem
come out for HRC (not that I think she's the cat's meow).
But there is an arguably affirmative case to be made on her behalf
(as the WaPo did today) that many of these papers agreed on in endorsing her
candidacy. The same clearly can NOT be said about her rival.

back to lurk mode

I hope you're around more when the season starts. We may need your calm to keep from leaping off a cliff.

dobrojim · Post #1757 » by **dobrojim** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:10 pm

Calm? Whatchu talkin bout?

LOL.

I expect to be around.

Induveca · Post #1758 » by **Induveca** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:21 pm

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599#efmARJAWn

Clinton's team strategizing how to keep citizenry "uninformed and compliant". Yet guarantee this will get no play because "Russia".

Wizardspride · Post #1759 » by **Wizardspride** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:25 pm

Induveca wrote:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599#efmARJAWn

Clinton's team strategizing how to keep citizenry "uninformed and compliant". Yet guarantee this will get no play because "Russia".

Yep. I'm all about "Russia".

Induveca · Post #1760 » by **Induveca** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:33 pm

Wizardspride wrote:
Induveca wrote:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599#efmARJAWn

Clinton's team strategizing how to keep citizenry "uninformed and compliant". Yet guarantee this will get no play because "Russia".

Yep. I'm all about "Russia".

This election has become so disgusting, from both the transparent corruption of the MSM and the toxicity of Trump and Clinton, the cameos by Assange and Anonymous hacks.....my coping mechanism has become comedy.

But viewed at a distance this really is an odd uprising of sorts by a large percentage of the population against the establishment. Not sure whether to be encouraged or spend some time in Europe and enjoy the favorable exchange rate while it lasts (and most importantly he besieged by mundane Scandinavian politics I'll immediately ignore).