Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote: I disagree with 95% of the posters here who think Flip's done well with what he has.
Whoa, I think that's way, way off base and your misreading the actual motivation of the supposed 'defenders'.
Nobody is pleased with anything.
I think the majority of 'Flip defenders' are in fact pretty lukewarm on Flip and are just getting all contrarian when you suggest that with lineup changes, which are frankly unrealistic taking into account a myriad of practical aspects, we'd actually be a good team. I think the majority of the resistance to the 'Flipocalypse' argument is that he's only one of the problems, not that people love Flip.
If we're talking coaching though, I mean, I for one dislike the entire idea of the necessity of having a point guard-centric offense long term, as I think that hinges our hopes on misguided personnel requirements when we'd be a lot better off drafting BPA, getting some wild and woolly wing scorer and running things through him. Or a post up guy, whatever. How many point guard dominated teams have won the championship if we don't count Magic?
And I hate that we played Jamison for 40 minutes a night and wrecked him physically with the trade deadline coming up and the team floundering. Inexcusable tactical myopia in the face of much larger strategic problems. The front office should have clacked the gavel there though.
I could find more things to complain about, but, I still don't think we'd be an actual good team with different lineups. Never bought into that.
Personally I hope that Flip agrees to a buyout if for no other reason than that we should have a cheaper coach while we slum it up. But I don't think he'll get fired with all that money on the contract.