ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XXV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,126
And1: 24,454
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1861 » by Pointgod » Fri May 24, 2019 5:38 pm

Oh and before daoneandonly comes with his usual moral bs here’s actual polling on abortion.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/05/22/abortion-law-republican-and-conservative-women-dont-all-agree/3749202002/

Polling shows about a third of Republicans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, according to the Pew Research Center, and more than half of Republican women support keeping Roe v. Wade, according to a 2018 poll from the non-partisan public opinion research firm PerryUndem. Nearly 90% of voters say they would support a friend or family member if they had an abortion.


Looks like Republicans don’t even agree with what their leadership is doing on abortion. Talk about ass backwards.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,866
And1: 20,409
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1862 » by dckingsfan » Fri May 24, 2019 5:45 pm

Pointgod wrote:Make vasectomies from birth is actually a much better solution. Why are you so against holding men accountable? It’s probably because you’d rather punish women than actually address a problem, pretty much par the course for the GOP playbook. Cruelty is the point. Please tell me what’s wrong with the idea of vasectomies for males which are way more safe than child birth and are not only effective but reversible. Tell me why this wouldn’t work?

Vasectomies and a male DNA library would work really well. It would do two things. It would vastly reduce the number of abortions. And males would suddenly want to do away with the penalties for abortions.
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,090
And1: 4,175
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1863 » by daoneandonly » Fri May 24, 2019 5:50 pm

Pointgod wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Speaking of accountability. I think we’ve found the solution to the abortion debate. Mandatory vasectomies for all males. You can pretty much reduce abortions to near zero. Not my idea but a pretty common sense solution.

https://www.designmom.com/twitter-thread-abortion/


Actually the solution is to do close to what Alabama is doing, its not completely flawless, but far better than what we have now. An abortion registry is also something better than what's posted above, you want to have an abortion, then own it, let the world know you killed your child so if a guy is potentially interested, at least he'd know what he was getting into and that his kid may be in danger if conceived. And if the guy pushed for the abortion or agreed to it, he too should be on it

And to the guys who felt the need to call out faith and Christianity, again not about that. Abortion isnt a Christian issue, its a moral issue, killing a child should be wrong no matter what you believe spiritually. I dont mention same sex marriage, because its not about my faith and there's no victim on that social issue, whereas the other one clearly has one. Yet most on here care more about criminals, addicts, etc than an actual baby who's done no wrong.


Make vasectomies from birth is actually a much better solution. Why are you so against holding men accountable? It’s probably because you’d rather punish women than actually address a problem, pretty much par the course for the GOP playbook. Cruelty is the point. Please tell me what’s wrong with the idea of vasectomies for males which are way more safe than child birth and are not only effective but reversible. Tell me why this wouldn’t work?


Because given a vesecrtomy to a baby is moronic and fruitless. I know liberal left doesn't care about a baby, and this further speaks to that, but just the notion is ludicrous. WHo's to say there won't be any complications? Who's to say the reversing is 100% safe?

I'm not about punishing women, I mentioned men who go along or even worse, push for the woman to have an abortion should also be on the abortion registry. These types of people should be known to the world just as sex offenders are
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1864 » by pancakes3 » Fri May 24, 2019 5:51 pm

equating zygotes with babies is already arguing in bad faith.
Bullets -> Wizards
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1865 » by pancakes3 » Fri May 24, 2019 5:52 pm

so is pretending that climate change is a polar bear issue and not a human issue.
Bullets -> Wizards
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,090
And1: 4,175
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1866 » by daoneandonly » Fri May 24, 2019 5:53 pm

Pointgod wrote:Oh and before daoneandonly comes with his usual moral bs here’s actual polling on abortion.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/05/22/abortion-law-republican-and-conservative-women-dont-all-agree/3749202002/

Polling shows about a third of Republicans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, according to the Pew Research Center, and more than half of Republican women support keeping Roe v. Wade, according to a 2018 poll from the non-partisan public opinion research firm PerryUndem. Nearly 90% of voters say they would support a friend or family member if they had an abortion.


Looks like Republicans don’t even agree with what their leadership is doing on abortion. Talk about ass backwards.


Even if that poll is credible, Republican does not equal true conservative. Trump once was pro choice, there are many of his base that I'm sure may identify as Republican now but are pro choice, so what?
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,090
And1: 4,175
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1867 » by daoneandonly » Fri May 24, 2019 5:57 pm

pancakes3 wrote:equating zygotes with babies is already arguing in bad faith.


and equating a murderer, rapist, drug user, etc, the same liberties as an upstanding citizen is even worse.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1868 » by Ruzious » Fri May 24, 2019 6:23 pm

Here's a link to a powerful poem on womens' rights. https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=396x549

Speaking of abortions, grats to Rudy G and his tweats... soon to be entertaining folks from a nursing home near you. He's so childishly stupid, ya gotta wonder if it's an act to divert from reality.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1869 » by pancakes3 » Fri May 24, 2019 6:31 pm

daoneandonly wrote:
pancakes3 wrote:equating zygotes with babies is already arguing in bad faith.


and equating a murderer, rapist, drug user, etc, the same liberties as an upstanding citizen is even worse.


nice try but my position was:
- deportation is not a solution to murder, rape, drug use
- drug laws (and felons) are categorically different than rape and murder
- you can't just say "murderer, rapist, drug user, etc" (read: etc. includes undocumented immigrants) as if they're all the same thing

but it's also very telling that you have a staunch refusal to accept scientific truths, be it the development of fertilized egg to person, or genetic predispositions to addiction, or climate change.
Bullets -> Wizards
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,090
And1: 4,175
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1870 » by daoneandonly » Fri May 24, 2019 6:38 pm

pancakes3 wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
pancakes3 wrote:equating zygotes with babies is already arguing in bad faith.


and equating a murderer, rapist, drug user, etc, the same liberties as an upstanding citizen is even worse.


nice try but my position was:
- deportation is not a solution to murder, rape, drug use
- drug laws (and felons) are categorically different than rape and murder
- you can't just say "murderer, rapist, drug user, etc" (read: etc. includes undocumented immigrants) as if they're all the same thing

but it's also very telling that you have a staunch refusal to accept scientific truths, be it the development of fertilized egg to person, or genetic predispositions to addiction, or climate change.


1. Deportation does not need to be a solution, but it can be a preventive measure and or a punishment. Both of things are beneficial when the criminal in question is illegally here. Say it helps to prevent just 2 measley murders, how is that bad? That's 2 people who are not killed, 2 families who dont have to deal with the trauma and bereavement.

2. A crime is a crime is a crime, granted yes murder and rape are by far the 2 worst, but drug users and sellers need to be held accountable for their choices

3. Speaking of which, choices. Drug use is a choice, not something a person is born to be in danger of. That's a liberal take. As easy as this, pancake, want to do a line of coke? Your response, no thanks man, I'm okay. Easy peezy lemon squeezey. I didnt dismiss climate change as a whole, I believe it has merit, I think the green new deal is one of the stupidest pieces of legislation thsi world has ever seen, but nonetheless, i do think there is a climate change issue. Where I take offense is there are those that are up in arms about the environment and how it relates to and impacts the animal kingdom. Those animals are not more important than babies, or any human for that matter, except maybe hardened criminals and parents who abort their children, then there's a valid argument.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1871 » by pancakes3 » Fri May 24, 2019 6:51 pm

daoneandonly wrote:
pancakes3 wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
and equating a murderer, rapist, drug user, etc, the same liberties as an upstanding citizen is even worse.


nice try but my position was:
- deportation is not a solution to murder, rape, drug use
- drug laws (and felons) are categorically different than rape and murder
- you can't just say "murderer, rapist, drug user, etc" (read: etc. includes undocumented immigrants) as if they're all the same thing

but it's also very telling that you have a staunch refusal to accept scientific truths, be it the development of fertilized egg to person, or genetic predispositions to addiction, or climate change.


1. Deportation does not need to be a solution, but it can be a preventive measure and or a punishment. Both of things are beneficial when the criminal in question is illegally here. Say it helps to prevent just 2 measley murders, how is that bad? That's 2 people who are not killed, 2 families who dont have to deal with the trauma and bereavement.

edit to add: you also think that deportation is a proper punishment? no. like I said - the police already apprehended the suspects and it's going to trial. that's how the criminal process works. deportation is actually a MUCH milder punishment for murder-rape. so again, why is deportation even in the conversation? it fails both as preventive as well as punitive.

2. A crime is a crime is a crime, granted yes murder and rape are by far the 2 worst, but drug users and sellers need to be held accountable for their choices

3. Speaking of which, choices. Drug use is a choice, not something a person is born to be in danger of. That's a liberal take. As easy as this, pancake, want to do a line of coke? Your response, no thanks man, I'm okay. Easy peezy lemon squeezey. I didnt dismiss climate change as a whole, I believe it has merit, I think the green new deal is one of the stupidest pieces of legislation thsi world has ever seen, but nonetheless, i do think there is a climate change issue. Where I take offense is there are those that are up in arms about the environment and how it relates to and impacts the animal kingdom. Those animals are not more important than babies, or any human for that matter, except maybe hardened criminals and parents who abort their children, then there's a valid argument.


1) Deportation is not an effective use of resources as a preventative measure. How about that? It's already been presented to you that welfare programs that reduce poverty, income inequality, and discrimination are better at preventing crime. Dollar for dollar, if you can prevent a thousand murders instead of 2 murders, isn't that better?

2) I don't know how else to present the argument that laws are the works of man, and can/should change if they are found to be bad laws. Drug laws are one of those laws. Putting that aside, it's not as easy as you asking me to do a line of coke and me refusing. The entire cookie analogy is lost on you, which goes back to my point that you intentionally wallow in a world view that doesn't take into account real world implications of how criminals are created.

3) It's not animals specifically, but nature at large. Deforestation, pollution, ozone depletion, species extinction etc. impact nature. The fact that there are species going extinct portents negative impacts for humans. When people freak out over polar bears, it's not because they love those cuddly creatures but because it means that the arctic biome is being destroyed. It's an indicator of climate change, and the visual of a polar bear on a tiny ice float compared with a vast arctic expanse helps illustrate the rapidness of the change. If you can't get out of your feelings about it, and take issue with the message, it's irrational.

Also, I'm sick and tired of people parroting that "the green new deal is one of the stupidest pieces of legislation this world has ever seen." It's not legislation. It's a policy proposal. By virtue of it taking the correct position on climate change already makes it categorically "not stupid." You can take issue with the details, and that's fine, but the hyperbolic pearl clutching over this drives me bonkers.
Bullets -> Wizards
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,866
And1: 20,409
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1872 » by dckingsfan » Fri May 24, 2019 7:13 pm

daoneandonly wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
Actually the solution is to do close to what Alabama is doing, its not completely flawless, but far better than what we have now. An abortion registry is also something better than what's posted above, you want to have an abortion, then own it, let the world know you killed your child so if a guy is potentially interested, at least he'd know what he was getting into and that his kid may be in danger if conceived. And if the guy pushed for the abortion or agreed to it, he too should be on it

And to the guys who felt the need to call out faith and Christianity, again not about that. Abortion isnt a Christian issue, its a moral issue, killing a child should be wrong no matter what you believe spiritually. I dont mention same sex marriage, because its not about my faith and there's no victim on that social issue, whereas the other one clearly has one. Yet most on here care more about criminals, addicts, etc than an actual baby who's done no wrong.


Make vasectomies from birth is actually a much better solution. Why are you so against holding men accountable? It’s probably because you’d rather punish women than actually address a problem, pretty much par the course for the GOP playbook. Cruelty is the point. Please tell me what’s wrong with the idea of vasectomies for males which are way more safe than child birth and are not only effective but reversible. Tell me why this wouldn’t work?

Because given a vesecrtomy to a baby is moronic and fruitless. I know liberal left doesn't care about a baby, and this further speaks to that, but just the notion is ludicrous. WHo's to say there won't be any complications? Who's to say the reversing is 100% safe?

I'm not about punishing women, I mentioned men who go along or even worse, push for the woman to have an abortion should also be on the abortion registry. These types of people should be known to the world just as sex offenders are

You have to ask yourself, what is worse - millions of abortions or vasectomies? I think that is a no brainer, right?
I_Like_Dirt
RealGM
Posts: 36,057
And1: 9,437
Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Location: Boardman gets paid!

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1873 » by I_Like_Dirt » Fri May 24, 2019 7:39 pm

dckingsfan wrote:You have to ask yourself, what is worse - millions of abortions or vasectomies? I think that is a no brainer, right?


Is it about punishing and establishing superiority or is it about actually preventing undesirable actions/outcomes? They're clearly not linked. The argument that fear is a deterrent is a massive oversimplification. In this case, banning abortion isn't a helpful solution and causes all sorts of other problems. Those that claim to see abortion as an evil that must be stopped frequently aren't interested in the issues that would actually reduce abortions effectively. Portugal legalized all drugs not so long ago and have seen their drug rates plummet afterwards. Fear isn't necessarily the best driver of the kinds of outcomes a person wants. The reality is that fear is more of a motivator than deterrent. Those that argue for fear as a deterrent are usually afraid of something themselves.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2017/11/22/at-yale-we-conducted-an-experiment-to-turn-conservatives-into-liberals-the-results-say-a-lot-about-our-political-divisions/?utm_term=.b96dc326edcf
Bucket! Bucket!
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1874 » by pancakes3 » Fri May 24, 2019 7:46 pm

while I think in the next decade or two, male-oriented contraception will become more mainstream, without healthcare reform, it would only exasperate the gap between unwanted pregancies for the rich and poor.
Bullets -> Wizards
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1875 » by pancakes3 » Fri May 24, 2019 8:40 pm

Bullets -> Wizards
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,349
And1: 11,545
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1876 » by Wizardspride » Sat May 25, 2019 12:38 am

Read on Twitter
?s=19

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,349
And1: 11,545
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1877 » by Wizardspride » Sat May 25, 2019 12:38 am

Read on Twitter
?s=19

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,812
And1: 7,935
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1878 » by montestewart » Sat May 25, 2019 2:42 am

Wizardspride wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=19

So you're saying that Mordovian Candidate Barr was hand picked by Putin, not to obstruct the Mueller investigation, but to implement a much more diabolical and grand design?
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,090
And1: 4,175
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1879 » by daoneandonly » Sat May 25, 2019 2:24 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Make vasectomies from birth is actually a much better solution. Why are you so against holding men accountable? It’s probably because you’d rather punish women than actually address a problem, pretty much par the course for the GOP playbook. Cruelty is the point. Please tell me what’s wrong with the idea of vasectomies for males which are way more safe than child birth and are not only effective but reversible. Tell me why this wouldn’t work?

Because given a vesecrtomy to a baby is moronic and fruitless. I know liberal left doesn't care about a baby, and this further speaks to that, but just the notion is ludicrous. WHo's to say there won't be any complications? Who's to say the reversing is 100% safe?

I'm not about punishing women, I mentioned men who go along or even worse, push for the woman to have an abortion should also be on the abortion registry. These types of people should be known to the world just as sex offenders are

You have to ask yourself, what is worse - millions of abortions or vasectomies? I think that is a no brainer, right?


There's a difference, one is a mandatory forced medical procedure, the other is a selfless decision to kill one's child. So for a woman who's had multiple abortions, would you support mandatory tube tying to stop the madness?
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,866
And1: 20,409
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#1880 » by dckingsfan » Sat May 25, 2019 3:06 pm

daoneandonly wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:Because given a vesecrtomy to a baby is moronic and fruitless. I know liberal left doesn't care about a baby, and this further speaks to that, but just the notion is ludicrous. WHo's to say there won't be any complications? Who's to say the reversing is 100% safe?

I'm not about punishing women, I mentioned men who go along or even worse, push for the woman to have an abortion should also be on the abortion registry. These types of people should be known to the world just as sex offenders are

You have to ask yourself, what is worse - millions of abortions or vasectomies? I think that is a no brainer, right?

There's a difference, one is a mandatory forced medical procedure, the other is a selfless decision to kill one's child. So for a woman who's had multiple abortions, would you support mandatory tube tying to stop the madness?

Yes. I would suggest that a woman be given a choice during any abortion procedure. Now, with more women turning to things like RU-486 that is more difficult.

I would support vasectomy at birth for males, DNA registration at birth, informed women vasectomy upon an abortion procedure, guaranteed living wage for a mother, guaranteed healthcare for the mother and child. But... I would do anything to reduce the number of abortions. I am all in on this - not part in.

Return to Washington Wizards