ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XIV

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1881 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 5:48 pm

Zonkerbl wrote:
TGW wrote:
Zonkerbl wrote:Dudes don't call out Nate please. Have some class.


lol so calling out a white supremacist (that's what Nate is) is having no class, huh? But pushing clearly racist propaganda like the bell curve and bull from breitbart is so classy. :roll: :roll: :roll:

please take this sanctimonious BS elsewhere. if anyone deserves to get called out, it's THAT GUY


You make my point for me, thanks.

Come on guys, let's not become 4chan.


Stop calling racists 'racist' in the name of civil discourse?
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,821
And1: 7,946
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1882 » by montestewart » Tue Aug 15, 2017 6:33 pm

gtn130 wrote:
montestewart wrote:
gtn130 wrote:There was literally a Nazi/KKK rally this weekend that resulted in an actual terrorist attack, yet people on this board still want to coddle racist Trump supporters lmaooo

Yes, there most definitely was a right-wing racist rally, ostensibly to protest the erasing of history through the deaccession of Confederate statues (but obviously intended to argue for the Confederacy, slavery, racism, white power, etc.), perpetrated by outside agitators, visited on a peaceful community, erupting in violence, intended to erupt in violence, containing a right-wing terrorist act that resulted in death, with the Trump/right-wing disinformation machine in full swing spewing out the Fakest News Possible! about all aspects of the event. Trump's weak response to the events, like his weak responses to Russia and Putin, are very telling when contrasted against his lightening fast and venomous attacks to anything else, no matter how trivial. Oh well, some people really didn't know Liberace was gay.

If you feel it helps you make your point, you can call out me or anyone else here, just make sure to keep it civil (no name calling) and within the terms of service. I find it more productive discussing messaging than singling out rank-and-file messengers who are absent (which starts to sound like the comment section of news sites). I don't see the coddling you're talking about. DCZards, Zonker, and plenty of others here have pretty strongly and directly addressed right-wing messages and messengers here in the past and in the present.


I take issue with the idea that we should go easy on Nate because he's a 'good guy' or whatever. Seems like you guys have a nice relationship with him, and that's cool, but that doesn't begin to excuse some of his most abhorrent posting here.

Sharing insidious fake news is one thing, but Nate made a lot of legitimately racist posts backed by specious and lightly sourced 'research' (basically white supremacist propaganda) and has been a vocal Trump defender, more or less unconditionally. I think his brand of posting was significantly different than anyone else's in that regard, and that's why I'm calling him out.

Like, I think there's a non-zero chance Nate sympathizes with these hate groups, and he's a mod here...

I don't feel like I'm coddling anyone. I see the cherry picked stats and scientific studies offered scattershot with what I perceive as an agenda of racial stratification and classification. Blacks, Latinos, and any sort of indigenous people are "dumber" and inferior, Jews and East Asians are "smarter, inscrutable," and thus inferior, and South Asians and Middle Easterners are classified as "inferiority-to-be-named-later."

The few posters who have consistently said positive things about the Trump administration may be absent as the connection between the rhetoric of Trump (and his extremist cronies) and the accompanying rise of an explicit and emboldened White Power movement becomes more and more clear. Trump supporters are kind of caught in a bind now, some in total denial, some rationalizing, some denouncing the behavior without denouncing the administration, some now denouncing the administration, and some more openly embracing the new found freedom of being white, proud, and superior.

I know it repels some people, and probably chased a few of my favorite posters away. It doesn't repel me. I've got a few relatives and friends who are struggling with this right now (including a favorite nephew). If I call them idiot, coward, racist, whatever, (as other friends and relatives have done), they'll never listen to me, and they really aren't letting too many alternative sources in. I'd rather try to be that alternate point of view they haven't shut out. Maybe that sounds naive to you, but I've seen it work before.

Obama's quote of Mandela on this subject seems appropriate here:
No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,071
And1: 4,756
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1883 » by Zonkerbl » Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:16 pm

It's real easy to pick on someone who can't defend himself, is all I'm saying. I wouldn't want someone to do that to me so I won't do it to Nate. It's got nothing to do with "coddling a racist" or whatever. It's called not being a dick.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,020
And1: 20,517
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1884 » by dckingsfan » Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:24 pm

montestewart wrote:I know it repels some people, and probably chased a few of my favorite posters away. It doesn't repel me. I've got a few relatives and friends who are struggling with this right now (including a favorite nephew). If I call them idiot, coward, racist, whatever, (as other friends and relatives have done), they'll never listen to me, and they really aren't letting too many alternative sources in. I'd rather try to be that alternate point of view they haven't shut out. Maybe that sounds naïve to you, but I've seen it work before.

Obama's quote of Mandela on this subject seems appropriate here:
No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.

This. The one thing I like about this board is that we can have civil discourse. If there is no discourse - what chance is there for opinions to change. To use your words, if you call someone an idiot, coward, racist or deplorable you will just harden opinions. Did we not see this with Hillary? “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.

The middle is much larger than the fringes right now... sway the middle and you win. Messaging matters... The Trump manifestation of discontent will run its course - do we want to be even more polarized on the other side? If you talk to the organizers of the those events, this is exactly what they want.
Benjammin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,485
And1: 633
Joined: Jan 18, 2003

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1885 » by Benjammin » Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:57 pm

I guess some have seen that as part of ESPN's marathon fantasy football show there was an auction segment with both black and white players, but the only people "bidding" were white. They have received criticism for this. Thoughts?

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1886 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:30 pm

montestewart wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
montestewart wrote:Yes, there most definitely was a right-wing racist rally, ostensibly to protest the erasing of history through the deaccession of Confederate statues (but obviously intended to argue for the Confederacy, slavery, racism, white power, etc.), perpetrated by outside agitators, visited on a peaceful community, erupting in violence, intended to erupt in violence, containing a right-wing terrorist act that resulted in death, with the Trump/right-wing disinformation machine in full swing spewing out the Fakest News Possible! about all aspects of the event. Trump's weak response to the events, like his weak responses to Russia and Putin, are very telling when contrasted against his lightening fast and venomous attacks to anything else, no matter how trivial. Oh well, some people really didn't know Liberace was gay.

If you feel it helps you make your point, you can call out me or anyone else here, just make sure to keep it civil (no name calling) and within the terms of service. I find it more productive discussing messaging than singling out rank-and-file messengers who are absent (which starts to sound like the comment section of news sites). I don't see the coddling you're talking about. DCZards, Zonker, and plenty of others here have pretty strongly and directly addressed right-wing messages and messengers here in the past and in the present.


I take issue with the idea that we should go easy on Nate because he's a 'good guy' or whatever. Seems like you guys have a nice relationship with him, and that's cool, but that doesn't begin to excuse some of his most abhorrent posting here.

Sharing insidious fake news is one thing, but Nate made a lot of legitimately racist posts backed by specious and lightly sourced 'research' (basically white supremacist propaganda) and has been a vocal Trump defender, more or less unconditionally. I think his brand of posting was significantly different than anyone else's in that regard, and that's why I'm calling him out.

Like, I think there's a non-zero chance Nate sympathizes with these hate groups, and he's a mod here...

I don't feel like I'm coddling anyone. I see the cherry picked stats and scientific studies offered scattershot with what I perceive as an agenda of racial stratification and classification. Blacks, Latinos, and any sort of indigenous people are "dumber" and inferior, Jews and East Asians are "smarter, inscrutable," and thus inferior, and South Asians and Middle Easterners are classified as "inferiority-to-be-named-later."

The few posters who have consistently said positive things about the Trump administration may be absent as the connection between the rhetoric of Trump (and his extremist cronies) and the accompanying rise of an explicit and emboldened White Power movement becomes more and more clear. Trump supporters are kind of caught in a bind now, some in total denial, some rationalizing, some denouncing the behavior without denouncing the administration, some now denouncing the administration, and some more openly embracing the new found freedom of being white, proud, and superior.

I know it repels some people, and probably chased a few of my favorite posters away. It doesn't repel me. I've got a few relatives and friends who are struggling with this right now (including a favorite nephew). If I call them idiot, coward, racist, whatever, (as other friends and relatives have done), they'll never listen to me, and they really aren't letting too many alternative sources in. I'd rather try to be that alternate point of view they haven't shut out. Maybe that sounds naive to you, but I've seen it work before.

Obama's quote of Mandela on this subject seems appropriate here:
No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.


I would be much more in favor of your approach if not for Trump's 'many sides' disgrace. If our leadership isn't providing the right message - that Nazis are evil - we need to pick up the slack.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1887 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:31 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
montestewart wrote:I know it repels some people, and probably chased a few of my favorite posters away. It doesn't repel me. I've got a few relatives and friends who are struggling with this right now (including a favorite nephew). If I call them idiot, coward, racist, whatever, (as other friends and relatives have done), they'll never listen to me, and they really aren't letting too many alternative sources in. I'd rather try to be that alternate point of view they haven't shut out. Maybe that sounds naïve to you, but I've seen it work before.

Obama's quote of Mandela on this subject seems appropriate here:
No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.

This. The one thing I like about this board is that we can have civil discourse. If there is no discourse - what chance is there for opinions to change. To use your words, if you call someone an idiot, coward, racist or deplorable you will just harden opinions. Did we not see this with Hillary? “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.

The middle is much larger than the fringes right now... sway the middle and you win. Messaging matters... The Trump manifestation of discontent will run its course - do we want to be even more polarized on the other side? If you talk to the organizers of the those events, this is exactly what they want.


My dude, I'm literally asking about Nate for the purpose of discourse.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,403
And1: 11,585
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1888 » by Wizardspride » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:38 pm

Ummm....Trump just doubled down on "both sides are at fault".

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,020
And1: 20,517
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1889 » by dckingsfan » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:40 pm

gtn130 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
montestewart wrote:I know it repels some people, and probably chased a few of my favorite posters away. It doesn't repel me. I've got a few relatives and friends who are struggling with this right now (including a favorite nephew). If I call them idiot, coward, racist, whatever, (as other friends and relatives have done), they'll never listen to me, and they really aren't letting too many alternative sources in. I'd rather try to be that alternate point of view they haven't shut out. Maybe that sounds naïve to you, but I've seen it work before.

Obama's quote of Mandela on this subject seems appropriate here:

This. The one thing I like about this board is that we can have civil discourse. If there is no discourse - what chance is there for opinions to change. To use your words, if you call someone an idiot, coward, racist or deplorable you will just harden opinions. Did we not see this with Hillary? “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.

The middle is much larger than the fringes right now... sway the middle and you win. Messaging matters... The Trump manifestation of discontent will run its course - do we want to be even more polarized on the other side? If you talk to the organizers of the those events, this is exactly what they want.

My dude, I'm literally asking about Nate for the purpose of discourse.

Sure doesn't feel that way :) - feels like you need to beat him into the ground.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,020
And1: 20,517
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1890 » by dckingsfan » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:41 pm

It may not feel like progress has been made sometimes but :):
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/14/us/west-point-black-female-first.html
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1891 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:43 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:This. The one thing I like about this board is that we can have civil discourse. If there is no discourse - what chance is there for opinions to change. To use your words, if you call someone an idiot, coward, racist or deplorable you will just harden opinions. Did we not see this with Hillary? “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.

The middle is much larger than the fringes right now... sway the middle and you win. Messaging matters... The Trump manifestation of discontent will run its course - do we want to be even more polarized on the other side? If you talk to the organizers of the those events, this is exactly what they want.

My dude, I'm literally asking about Nate for the purpose of discourse.

Sure doesn't feel that way :) - feels like you need to beat him into the ground.


Nah, it just depends on what he would say.

If, for example, he said something like, "I condemn in the strongest most possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides. On many sides," then yeah I think he'd deserve some criticism.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1892 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:45 pm

this is the day that donald trump became president

Spoiler:
of the confederacy
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1893 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:47 pm

Zonkerbl wrote:It's real easy to pick on someone who can't defend himself, is all I'm saying. I wouldn't want someone to do that to me so I won't do it to Nate. It's got nothing to do with "coddling a racist" or whatever. It's called not being a dick.


He can defend himself tho
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1894 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:49 pm

Wizardspride wrote:Ummm....Trump just doubled down on "both sides are at fault".


"there were very fine people...on both sides" direct quote
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,020
And1: 20,517
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1895 » by dckingsfan » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:50 pm

gtn130 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:My dude, I'm literally asking about Nate for the purpose of discourse.

Sure doesn't feel that way :) - feels like you need to beat him into the ground.


Nah, it just depends on what he would say.

If, for example, he said something like, "I condemn in the strongest most possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides. On many sides," then yeah I think he'd deserve some criticism.

Interesting - you are tacitly endorsing violence if it suits your views? Or are you saying all violence should be criticized?
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,821
And1: 7,946
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1896 » by montestewart » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:59 pm

Wizardspride wrote:Ummm....Trump just doubled down on "both sides are at fault".

In Trump's world, Black Lives Matter is wrong, but the KKK/Nazis...plenty of blame to spread around here. Oh, what a corrupted soul has he.

Our president is a spoiled, childish, churlish, delusional, inarticulate, and wholly unaccountable a-hole who revels in his own ignorance. These are the qualities that got him elected! Poor America and poor world.
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,071
And1: 4,756
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1897 » by Zonkerbl » Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:18 pm

Not only that but he just equated George Washington and Thomas Jefferson with Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.

Um, dude, you do realize the Confederacy were all enemies of the state right? And that the leaders of the enemy are therefore the biggest traitors in history?

Are you trying to say George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are also symbols of repression? Did they ALSO support the institution of slavery?
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,821
And1: 7,946
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1898 » by montestewart » Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:18 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Sure doesn't feel that way :) - feels like you need to beat him into the ground.


Nah, it just depends on what he would say.

If, for example, he said something like, "I condemn in the strongest most possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides. On many sides," then yeah I think he'd deserve some criticism.

Interesting - you are tacitly endorsing violence if it suits your views? Or are you saying all violence should be criticized?

Saw an interesting discussion on the off topic board regarding the limits of free speech. While some drearily dredge up the "fire in a movie theater" scenario to illustrate limits on free speech, there is speech that is intended to threaten, with an implied physical component. The playbook of American Aparthied involved relentless hate "speech" accompanied by systematic violence: brutal and discriminatory enforcement of the "law," along with extrajudicial beatings, arson, rape, and murder. The "speechmakers" (often grinningly) denied any connection with the violent acts, but the acts and the speech were a coordinated public-private partnership of oppression.

Why is "stalking" illegal in many places? If it's trespassing, assault, fraud, etc., charge them with that, otherwise a stalker is just exercising freedom of speech and movement, right? If someone points a gun at you and says, "I'm going to kill you!" isn't that protected speech? They haven't hurt you, have they?

To many Americans, the rise of the White Power movement represents a normalizing of philosophies tied to the justification of legal slavery, of legal murder. At what point do you stop talking and start acting? Not intended rhetorically, it's a real question for which I have no answer. Free speech is not as simple as it seems.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1899 » by gtn130 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:22 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Sure doesn't feel that way :) - feels like you need to beat him into the ground.


Nah, it just depends on what he would say.

If, for example, he said something like, "I condemn in the strongest most possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides. On many sides," then yeah I think he'd deserve some criticism.

Interesting - you are tacitly endorsing violence if it suits your views? Or are you saying all violence should be criticized?


You're missing my point. It's the 'many sides' false equivalence in that statement that is both incontrovertibly incorrect and perniciously harmful.

There were Nazis and Klasmen on one side and folks protesting Nazis and Klansmen on the other. They are not the same.
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,071
And1: 4,756
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIV 

Post#1900 » by Zonkerbl » Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:22 pm

And where is this fake narrative that BLM is violent coming from? BLM is a peaceful movement whose purpose is to protest against violence against black people. The Alt-right is a white nationalist group that advocates for hatred of and violence against black (and other non-white) people. They proved this unequivocally last weekend. The two things are not even remotely morally equivalent.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.

Return to Washington Wizards