ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,145
And1: 4,993
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1901 » by DCZards » Thu Nov 29, 2018 5:36 am

payitforward wrote:What are we talking about? Guys who are playing a lot of minutes at the 2 this year & being more productive than Brad?

Malcolm Brogdon, Harden, Jeremy Lamb, Tony Snell, Jrue Holiday, Josh Hart, DeRozan, Marcus Smart, Danny Green, Allonzo Trier, Victor Oladipo, Spencer Dinwiddie, Kent Bazemore, Fred VanVleet, Buddy Hield.

Off topic: this kid Allonzo Trier is really something. Undrafted, & he's 6th in minutes among all rookies & @4th highest in productivity. Even more surprising than that is the fact that the 4 best rookies so far are Mitchell Robinson, Deandre Ayton, Hamidou Diallo & Trier.

That's 2 R2 picks, an undrafted kid, & the number 1 pick in the draft. Wow....


I know how you hate to talk about role and context, pif, but here goes.

Is it fair to compare Beal, who is arguably his team's primary scorer and the focus of the other team's D when he's on the court, with guys like Brogdon, Hart, Green and VanVleet, who share the court with superstars and are typically their team's third or fourth option when they are on the court, or guys like Smart and Snell who play the bulk of their minutes against backups.

I think you also have to factor in per game minutes. Snell may be more productive than Beal playing 16 mins and Smart, Lamb and VanVleet may be more productive playing 24-28 mins. But there's a good chance their efficiency/production would take a hit if they were asked to play the 36 mins a game that Beal plays.

There are maybe 4-5 players on your list (DeRozan, Oladipo, Harden and maybe Holiday) that most GMs would take over Beal. And, since this is the trade thread, isn't that what this discussion is really about.

So, yeah, if you take a statistical snapshot of where things stand today, these other guys may be more productive than Beal so far this season, but I seriously doubt that many people consider them better basketball players than BB.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,552
And1: 1,989
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1902 » by gambitx777 » Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:13 am

If i had to take E.G. job right now, I would make deals to get out of wall and otto porters contracts before i trade beal, I see beal as someone who could be salvaged. Hell ,otto could be salvaged. But here we are in a place where we have a chance to trade beal now, a little early and get a lot for him over keeping him, talking him into staying, ad trying to trade him later when hes not worth it. if we trade wall, which i think we will and have too, brad will some time get a super max. I think wall and otto are movable with out giving something to move them, but they won't bring back much. You got to take some risk,
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1903 » by truwizfan4evr » Thu Nov 29, 2018 2:59 pm

gambitx777 wrote:If i had to take E.G. job right now, I would make deals to get out of wall and otto porters contracts before i trade beal, I see beal as someone who could be salvaged. Hell ,otto could be salvaged. But here we are in a place where we have a chance to trade beal now, a little early and get a lot for him over keeping him, talking him into staying, ad trying to trade him later when hes not worth it. if we trade wall, which i think we will and have too, brad will some time get a super max. I think wall and otto are movable with out giving something to move them, but they won't bring back much. You got to take some risk,

move wall and beal and keep otto.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
User avatar
Shoe
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,372
And1: 956
Joined: Nov 06, 2017
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1904 » by Shoe » Thu Nov 29, 2018 3:33 pm

payitforward wrote:
Oh & that's while you target lets say the #1-2 & #4-6 picks & you wind up with Michael Beasley, Joe Alexander, Hasheem Thabeet, Evan Turner, Ekbe Udoh, Jonny Flynn, Brandon Jennings, Terrence Wiliams, Derrick Williams, Jan Vesely, Brandon Knight, Jimmer Fredette, both of the Morris twins, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Thomas Robinson, Terrence Ross, Austin Rivers, Dion Waiters, Anthony Bennett, Alex Len, Ben McLemore, Trey Burke, Andrew Wiggins, Jabari Parker, Dante Exum, Nik Stauskas, D'Angelo Russell, Jahlil Okafor, Mario Hezonja, Emmanuel Mudiay, some of whom fall to you through good luck b/c after all sometimes you are below #6 but still have a terrific high lottery pick, right? Enabling you to get a guy like Stanley Johnson for example. Right?

Shoe wrote:Also, the GM who consistently hits on late picks doesn't exist and will never exist.

True enough. Ditto the GM who consistently hits on any pick lower than #3 overall. As should be obvious from the above.


Thank you for proving my point. You just rattled off all the reasons why trading Bradley Beal for a pick/picks this early is a bad idea. Like most GMs, I would definitely draft all of those busts, because my scouts and the draft experts would have said they were the best players available. If Brandon Knight lasted one more pick the Hornets could've drafted him over Kemba. Every GM would've taken Derrick Williams over Kanter, Thompson, and Jonas. Cleveland took Waiters over Lillard. The Wizards would've taken Flynn over Rubio and Curry. Sam Hinke drafted Okafor over Porzingis.

The Wizards have been a terrible organization. The best players the franchise drafted in recent history:
Rasheed Wallace in 95'
Rip Hamilton in 99'
John Wall in 2010
Bradley Beal in 2012
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,416
And1: 19,469
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1905 » by shrink » Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:28 pm

Hey everyone, at one of my two favorite boards! Can you help me with questions, that you can answer better than me...?

1. Does anyone know for sure whether John Wall has a trade kicker on his current contract - not the new one?

2. If he does, is the trade kicker based on his the average of the future money, like a poison pill, for incoming and outgoing salary?

Thanks guys.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,271
And1: 22,704
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1906 » by nate33 » Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:38 pm

shrink wrote:Hey everyone, at one of my two favorite boards! Can you help me with questions, that you can answer better than me...?

1. Does anyone know for sure whether John Wall has a trade kicker on his current contract - not the new one?

2. If he does, is the trade kicker based on his the average of the future money, like a poison pill, for incoming and outgoing salary?

Thanks guys.

I don't think anyone knows for sure. The best information I heard was from Zach Lowe who contacted the NBA on the issue. He says that Wall effectively has a $21M trade kicker that would be applied this season (and this season only) if he was traded. (He can't get a raise in future seasons because he is already at the max.) But Lowe said that he wasn't sure that even the NBA had issued an official ruling on it and this current interpretation may not be final.

A $21M trade kicker essentially makes him untradeable because it's effectively a massive poison pill. Washington would be sending out $18M in salary, meaning they could only receive back no more than about $25M. But the trade partner would be receiving $39M in salary meaning they'd have to send out at least $31.2M. At a minimum, a third party with cap room would have to absorb that $6.2M difference in salary.

What I don't know is whether or not Wall could waive some or all of that trade kicker, to make it small enough to fit within the 125% Rule.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,416
And1: 19,469
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1907 » by shrink » Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:41 pm

Great answer. Thanks Nate.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,271
And1: 22,704
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1908 » by nate33 » Fri Nov 30, 2018 12:10 am

I thought of another trade possibility for Wall that might even resolve the poison pill issues associated with Wall's trade kicker. The trick is to send Wall out with a bunch of other salaries, and get back a bunch of other salaries so that the net dollar value of the trade is larger, giving more wiggle room via the 125% Rule.

The deal is with Cleveland and it's based on Wall for George Hill who have virtually the same contract. But in addition, we include a Mahinmi for Tristan Thompson swap, and they have virtually the same contract. And we also include a Jason Smith for Jordan Clarkson swap. Jason Smith's deal is smaller and shorter, but that actually helps the deal.

So the deal looks like this:
Image

We are sending out $40.5M in contracts and receiving back 49.0M from Cleveland, which fits within the 125% rule.
Cleveland sends out $49.0M and gets back $40.5M in contracts plus another $21M in Wall's trade kicker for a total of $61.5M. They can actually only take back $61.25M so it misses by just $250,000, but I'm sure that can be accommodated by including a swap of minimum salary guys or we could absorb a minimum salary guy into our Jodie Meeks trade exception.

Obviously, we would want a pick in the deal, particularly since that Clarkson for Smith swap saddles us with Clarkson's contract for an extra year. The other big issue is this adds $8.5M in salary this year, plus the associated luxtax costs. Ouch!

There are other tweaks that could applied a little later in the year when Dwight Howard and Alec Burks are eligible to be included, but the Trade Checker won't let me try them right now. I would definitely explore adding a Rivers for Burks swap to increase the net amount of dollars changing hands. And I'd prefer to trade Howard in place of Smith (assuring us that Howard won't be on our cap next year), particularly since we're getting Tristan Thompson in the deal and he will be fine as starting center next year. The bigger the total salaries changing hands in the deal, the less net additional salary we have to take back, reducing the degree our luxtax fees increase.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,158
And1: 7,928
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1909 » by Dat2U » Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:27 am

nate33 wrote:I thought of another trade possibility for Wall that might even resolve the poison pill issues associated with Wall's trade kicker. The trick is to send Wall out with a bunch of other salaries, and get back a bunch of other salaries so that the net dollar value of the trade is larger, giving more wiggle room via the 125% Rule.

The deal is with Cleveland and it's based on Wall for George Hill who have virtually the same contract. But in addition, we include a Mahinmi for Tristan Thompson swap, and they have virtually the same contract. And we also include a Jason Smith for Jordan Clarkson swap. Jason Smith's deal is smaller and shorter, but that actually helps the deal.

So the deal looks like this:
Image

We are sending out $40.5M in contracts and receiving back 49.0M from Cleveland, which fits within the 125% rule.
Cleveland sends out $49.0M and gets back $40.5M in contracts plus another $21M in Wall's trade kicker for a total of $61.5M. They can actually only take back $61.25M so it misses by just $250,000, but I'm sure that can be accommodated by including a swap of minimum salary guys or we could absorb a minimum salary guy into our Jodie Meeks trade exception.

Obviously, we would want a pick in the deal, particularly since that Clarkson for Smith swap saddles us with Clarkson's contract for an extra year. The other big issue is this adds $8.5M in salary this year, plus the associated luxtax costs. Ouch!

There are other tweaks that could applied a little later in the year when Dwight Howard and Alec Burks are eligible to be included, but the Trade Checker won't let me try them right now. I would definitely explore adding a Rivers for Burks swap to increase the net amount of dollars changing hands. And I'd prefer to trade Howard in place of Smith (assuring us that Howard won't be on our cap next year), particularly since we're getting Tristan Thompson in the deal and he will be fine as starting center next year. The bigger the total salaries changing hands in the deal, the less net additional salary we have to take back, reducing the degree our luxtax fees increase.


I don't see Cleveland taking on THAT much in salary. I think the only way a deal happens before next year is if Wall waives his kicker. Would amiable to leave if he was going to a better situation or location? Miami? LA Lakers? New York?
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,158
And1: 7,928
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1910 » by Dat2U » Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:53 am

Wizards trade:

Otto Porter
Tomas Satoransky

76ers trade:

2019 SAC 1st round pick - only conveys if #1 pick
2021 MIA 1st round pick - unprotected
Zhaire Smith
Furkan Korkmaz
Mike Muscala
Wilson Chandler
Jonah Bolden

Sixers get the perfect fit to complete their starting lineup and add a potential sixth man in Sato as they go all in and high IQ chemistry pieces to surround their top heavy big 3. They also get to keep Fultz to use as an asset to fill other needs.

Wizards take a flier on Zhaire Smith who fell to the rookie curse that has caused multiple 1st round picks of theirs in recent years to miss the entire season. But the real prize is the Zion lottery ticket with has a small chance of hitting and the Miami pick which is probably the most prized and likely to be actualized asset.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,158
And1: 7,928
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1911 » by Dat2U » Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:58 am

Beal should be on the market. But the Wizards should be very patient and prudent in moving him. He's not a free agent for another 200+ games or so. Just wait for the Godfather offer.

My dream would be Jaren Jackson Jr of Memphis but that may not be realistic even if the Wizards offered sweetener.

Last offseason the Grizzlies would have traded the 4th pick & Parsons for Beal in a heartbeat.

So that may be the move to make. Wait to the 2019 draft and deal Beal for the best pick or combination of picks. He'll still have a ton of trade value with 2 years left on his deal at that time.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,552
And1: 1,989
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1912 » by gambitx777 » Fri Nov 30, 2018 6:09 am

i don't think there has yet to be a ruling on the out going or in going value that counts in that kicker? i think walls outgoing stays what it is but once hes on the other team he gets an instant raise, while it counts aginst the cap, I don't believe it counts in the outgoing trade value, towards the rule.
WallStar
Junior
Posts: 332
And1: 195
Joined: Feb 03, 2017
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1913 » by WallStar » Fri Nov 30, 2018 6:34 am

Serious question does GS trade Durant before the deadline if he outright tells them "I'M OUT" after the season.

If so, would they consider dealing for Beal?

A lot of hypotheticals, and I know they probably ride it out till the end, but I want to know what you guys think and if GS would even consider the deal. Beal has a few years left on the contract which adds to his value. I can also see his personality meshing really well with their group.

Would we have to add a pick or can we swing it straight up?
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,932
And1: 9,312
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1914 » by queridiculo » Fri Nov 30, 2018 8:59 am

Dat2U wrote:Wizards trade:

Otto Porter
Tomas Satoransky

76ers trade:

2019 SAC 1st round pick - only conveys if #1 pick
2021 MIA 1st round pick - unprotected
Zhaire Smith
Furkan Korkmaz
Mike Muscala
Wilson Chandler
Jonah Bolden

Sixers get the perfect fit to complete their starting lineup and add a potential sixth man in Sato as they go all in and high IQ chemistry pieces to surround their top heavy big 3. They also get to keep Fultz to use as an asset to fill other needs.

Wizards take a flier on Zhaire Smith who fell to the rookie curse that has caused multiple 1st round picks of theirs in recent years to miss the entire season. But the real prize is the Zion lottery ticket with has a small chance of hitting and the Miami pick which is probably the most prized and likely to be actualized asset.


Naw, I'm not doing the Sixers any favors, wouldn't make that trade out of principle.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,932
And1: 9,312
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1915 » by queridiculo » Fri Nov 30, 2018 8:59 am

WallStar wrote:Serious question does GS trade Durant before the deadline if he outright tells them "I'M OUT" after the season.

If so, would they consider dealing for Beal?

A lot of hypotheticals, and I know they probably ride it out till the end, but I want to know what you guys think and if GS would even consider the deal. Beal has a few years left on the contract which adds to his value. I can also see his personality meshing really well with their group.

Would we have to add a pick or can we swing it straight up?


I most certainly wouldn't, there's zero chance he would resign with the Wizards.

Durant has made it abundantly clear that he doesn't care to play in his hometown, and the fact that the Wizards couldn't even get a meeting with him sort of tells the story about how little respect he has for how the organization is run.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,271
And1: 22,704
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1916 » by nate33 » Fri Nov 30, 2018 1:59 pm

Dat2U wrote:I don't see Cleveland taking on THAT much in salary. I think the only way a deal happens before next year is if Wall waives his kicker. Would amiable to leave if he was going to a better situation or location? Miami? LA Lakers? New York?

The deal does get Cleveland out of some 2020 contracts, but your point still stands. Trading Wall this year, no matter who he is traded too, results in somebody (a combination of us and our trade partner) having to pay $21M more than they would otherwise have to pay if there's no trade. $21M is a heck of a lot of money, particularly if there are luxtax surcharges in addition.

I agree. The reality is Wall won't be traded unless that trade kicker can be waived.

I must say, looking at Cleveland's contracts, they could be a viable trade partner for Wall this summer. They'll have a ton of 2020 contracts to use as ballast to balance Wall's $37M cap figure.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,310
And1: 7,413
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1917 » by FAH1223 » Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:23 pm

Dat2U wrote:Beal should be on the market. But the Wizards should be very patient and prudent in moving him. He's not a free agent for another 200+ games or so. Just wait for the Godfather offer.

My dream would be Jaren Jackson Jr of Memphis but that may not be realistic even if the Wizards offered sweetener.

Last offseason the Grizzlies would have traded the 4th pick & Parsons for Beal in a heartbeat.

So that may be the move to make. Wait to the 2019 draft and deal Beal for the best pick or combination of picks. He'll still have a ton of trade value with 2 years left on his deal at that time.


The Grizzlies LOVE Jaren Jackson Jr. I doubt they'd ever give him up just listening to how their brass, the fans, and how Conley/Gasol love the kid.
Image
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,310
And1: 7,413
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1918 » by FAH1223 » Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:46 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,718
And1: 9,157
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1919 » by payitforward » Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:46 pm

DCZards wrote:
payitforward wrote:What are we talking about? Guys who are playing a lot of minutes at the 2 this year & being more productive than Brad?

Malcolm Brogdon, Harden, Jeremy Lamb, Tony Snell, Jrue Holiday, Josh Hart, DeRozan, Marcus Smart, Danny Green, Allonzo Trier, Victor Oladipo, Spencer Dinwiddie, Kent Bazemore, Fred VanVleet, Buddy Hield.

Off topic: this kid Allonzo Trier is really something. Undrafted, & he's 6th in minutes among all rookies & @4th highest in productivity. Even more surprising than that is the fact that the 4 best rookies so far are Mitchell Robinson, Deandre Ayton, Hamidou Diallo & Trier.

That's 2 R2 picks, an undrafted kid, & the number 1 pick in the draft. Wow....

I know how you hate to talk about role and context, pif, but here goes.

Is it fair to compare Beal, who is arguably his team's primary scorer and the focus of the other team's D when he's on the court, with guys like Brogdon, Hart, Green and VanVleet, who share the court with superstars and are typically their team's third or fourth option when they are on the court, or guys like Smart and Snell who play the bulk of their minutes against backups.

I think you also have to factor in per game minutes. Snell may be more productive than Beal playing 16 mins and Smart, Lamb and VanVleet may be more productive playing 24-28 mins. But there's a good chance their efficiency/production would take a hit if they were asked to play the 36 mins a game that Beal plays.

There are maybe 4-5 players on your list (DeRozan, Oladipo, Harden and maybe Holiday) that most GMs would take over Beal. And, since this is the trade thread, isn't that what this discussion is really about.

So, yeah, if you take a statistical snapshot of where things stand today, these other guys may be more productive than Beal so far this season, but I seriously doubt that many people consider them better basketball players than BB.

There's a lot to what you say, Zards. & I hope you noticed that I didn't use the "better basketball players" framework. All I did was point to "guys... playing a lot of minutes... & being more productive than Brad."

In fact, I dislike the whole "good, better, best" framework, as it is kind of "metaphysical," if you will -- as if there were some "thing" called "goodness," & Brad had more of that mysterious substance than some other guy. In fact, "good" is an honorific term, a term of praise -- very like "beautiful" &, for that matter, "intelligent."

If we look back at a whole career, ok, we have the ability to judge how "good" a player was. But, in that instance we're looking at a closed case; if we compare that guy to another such "closed case," we have some distance & we have all the data. It's possible to compare & to rank players.

But we don't know how "good" Brad is in that sense -- he's 25 with most of his career ahead of him.

Maybe the point is even clearer if we talk about Allonzo Trier. Right now, this undrafted rookie -- a kid who wasn't even projected to be drafted! -- is playing way better than Brad. But, I wouldn't draw any metaphysical conclusions about the essential "goodness" of Allonzo Trier!

Still, there's no problem taking note of how well he's playing. &, in the same way that I wouldn't say he has more "goodness" than Brad, I also can't say "well... he's not as good as Brad Beal." &, to your other point, of course, any GM would rather have Beal than Trier! Brad has proven more.

But "rather have" is kind of meaningless independent of a player's salary. Allonzo Trier is on a 2-way contract. No doubt it'll be converted as soon as he gets near the maximum time a 2-way can be with the mother team (pretty soon I would think -- the kid is 4th on the team in minutes). & Beal's salary (along w/ Wall's & Otto's) is what stands in the way of improving this team. Or better just say that our overall salaries are the problem, & trading at least 1 of the 3 huge salaries seems almost inevitable.

In that sense, i.e. salary taken into account, I'd rather have Buddy Hield than Beal, & I'd much rather have Josh Hart than Hield or Beal or Trier.

In short, since as you say this is the trade thread, would I trade Beal for Josh Hart, Allonzo Trier, a high R2 pick, & an expiring salary just big enough to get the deal legal (while small enough to get us under the tax or at least help a lot in that)? I sure would -- in a minute! With no criticism of Brad Beal implied.
User avatar
Axolotl
Starter
Posts: 2,349
And1: 2,282
Joined: Feb 05, 2018
Location: The Vasty Deep

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#1920 » by Axolotl » Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:58 pm

Hello from the Bulls board, just wondering what you folks think about this:

Read on Twitter


Personally I like Otto Porter's game quite a bit, and think he'd fit well with the Bulls. What I don't much like though is the contract he comes with...

From a purely financial perspective this would make sense for the Wizards.
From the basketball's perspective, travel is a nice pause from being pounded to the floor.

Return to Washington Wizards