Dat2U wrote:payitforward wrote:Looks like I have a convert in SUPERBALLMAN. Trading down is always good. & best when served with a freshly-bought additional R2 pick.
Now let me explain how I think we can geet 6 rookies out of this draft -- as we obviously could have last year (why don't they listen to me???)!
Because no GM or coach wants six rookies ... especially a team that isn't headed to the lottery next year.
In that case... fire the coach!
Dat -- don't lose your sense of humor, brother! Do I get ruffled when someone jokingly suggests that I am trying to figure out a series of trade-downs that gets us the entirety of R2?
You are right -- no team would be able to absorb 6 rookies. Nor will any team be likely to test that statement!
But, absolutely any team can absorb 2 rookies. &, w/o taking a close look team by team, I'd bet that almost every team could absorb 3 rookies. Certainly (obviously) if one of them was a 2 way player. After all, it's the #13, 14 & 15 players who'd be pushed out.
In any case, there is no question whatever about the Wizards: we'd have no trouble absorbing 2 rookies &, really, no more trouble absorbing a 3d one.
If we pick up Gill's option, sign Mathews (say for $2m), & add the #15 pick, we'll have 11 players at @$124.5m. If we use our exceptions to add 2 FAs for a total of, say, $9m, we'll be @$2.5m below the tax with only 13 players -- say a vet minimum guy & a 2d rookie. Or 2 more rookies instead.
Now... all this may change -- we might trade Bertans, for example. But... it's a long shot.