CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:payitforward wrote:CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Well it's convenient that you cut out the part where I clearly say I really don't know at the end of the day and that's just how it kind of read to me.
And what the hell is this pompous air you have about yourself, talking about what I may or may not do for a living, as it relates to this discussion? You now tried to insinuate the Dawkins is somehow immune to any critique because of title and status. I guess by that line of reasoning, Jeffrey Epstein would be immune to any of anyone's criticism because he was a well to do business man.
Off the wall is you and doclinkin continuing to embarrass yourselves with ad hominem attacks.
It's hard work staying on a friendly basis with you
But I'm going to keep working on it!
I'll stick with pompous. Not the first time you've made the same insinuation about the level of my personal success or career. Now see there's another fact. I can pull the receipts on that one when I have enough time too if you'd like.
I meant no insult at all. I have no reason of any kind to have any "attitude" in your direction, & therefore I have none.
OTOH, if you feel that I've insulted you in any way, you have my apology. I can assure you it was not my intention to do so.
Above all, there's no benefit for either of us or for the board in this kind of conflict -- tho of course we can differ about Wizards' issues! That's why I asked what color you painted the kids' rooms.
I really have no "ad hominem" kinds of opinions about anyone on this board, neither about you nor about anyone else. Peace!
