doclinkin wrote:This is actually probably the surest way to a championship. To a contender, anyway. You don't get the ring unless you have a true #1 #1 overall. With three exceptions: Detroit when the opposing Finals team had poor chemistry and feuding stars. Celtics, for a one and done, after trading for a disgruntled superstar and desperate veterans. And the Lakers after one of the most lopsided trades ever, and after a few years of struggling with mediocrity, with Kobe as one of those lotto gambles on an unproven talented youngster who had to season and develop a bit.
Key thing is to keep it fun regardless. Keep the fanbase interested. As fans, to keep the expectations on simmer and watch the thing develop. Can't expect to dominate, but to improve in surges and waves, and watch for those key highwater marks. One way or the other it should be interesting, we just have to keep our balance as a fanbase, ride the swells, and expect when the big wave comes it's gonna be one hellofa ride. Not this one, not the next one, I see a bigger one out there...
doc, to the first point: Outside of the Detroit example, you can go back nearly half a century and it still validates the #1#1 premise. I would contend that the guys who won titles but weren't #1 overall - KG and Kobe, but don't forget Bird, MJ, and Dr. J - were all anomalies that won't happen again:
Bird - "Junior eligible" draftee, #6 overall
Dr. J - went to ABA, #12 overall in NBA draft due to legal questions over his rights
KG & Kobe - reluctance by NBA GMs to draft high schoolers #1 overall. Clearly the best in their respective classes, would have been #1 if it were more accepted as it later became.
MJ - Well, the guy drafted #1 did win a few titles himself, and then there's the whole Bowie thing... yeah, that could happen again.
Point is, for the most part, those are guys who would be drafted #1 overall now if you redid their drafts (even not having the benefit of hindsight on their pro careers, simply by changing the circumstances in which they were drafted). The rest of the titles were won by Shaq, Magic, Kareem, Walton, Duncan/Robinson, Isiah...
And, needless to say to this crowd, just because a guy is taken #1 overall doesn't mean that he's truly a #1#1 - and even if he is of that caliber (Ewing? Howard? LeBron? - we can hope) there's no guarantee that he'll actually win a title.
Which leads me to the second point - incremental steps are better than no steps at all. As a GM, you've got to make the best team you can at a given time. No sense pining for a player who doesn't exist - or if there is a guy, go get him. And if you can't, then move along.
And in the long run, if the best you can do is be the StocktontoMalone Jazz or Reggie's Pacers or Dirk's Mavs or Nash's Suns, well, that's a far sight better than being the Bullards of the past 30 years. So why complain and whine about it, enjoy the ride and hope that you get that lucky year where the other team(s) implode right before you. At least we'd be watching actual games now instead of shaky cell phone videos and reading Euro scouting reports...