Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:hands, to say Booker is a rebounder without quantifying it and comparing the two is the reason why some GMs don't get it.
To compare height and weight with Seraphin also fails to consider rebounds, possessions, and potential wins. Blair isn't 6' 7". He's more like 6' 5 1/2". He's listed at 275 but he was 315 at Pitt, and probably goes in the 280s now. He's never going to look or be as athletic as Seraphin. Kevin is never going to get rebounds like Blair.
hands, you really want to wait to see what Singleton might be? Come on out and say you don't like Blair at all. It's okay to me and fine if that's the way you feel. I think you know what I said years back and I think if he comes to the team you're going to become a fan real quickly of Blair. He's a basketball player.
Booker is a basketball player who brings it, too. I like him.
Kevin Seraphin really, really, really had a bad season last year. I believe, however, Kevin Seraphin is EXACTLY what the Spurs need. I get that he can score and not be a liability defensively. But dude is a LOUSY PLAYER in WS/48. It's what he doesn't do that hurts teams. He jacks shots and doesn't rebound. He doesn't get 50/50 balls. Seraphin is nowhere near the basketball player that DeJuan Blair is. Blair was winning gold medals abroad in junior national games years ago. He carried a team to the Final Four. His stats were BETTER than Blake Griffins, per the stat geeks at Wages of Wins (and me, too). To go by height and athleticism, yes, Seraphin is better. But no way on earth is Seraphin the better basketball player .... yet.
Why would I do that? I think I paid him compliments for the advantages he would bring. I'm just not convinced its in a area that the Wizards should be focusing.
Blair for any of those players based on what they have actually already done, and experience, and NBA maturity, Blair wins vs... fill in the blank. As you just said and I also said when I posted, he is the better basketball player. He is a better known vs players that have questions.
And yeah, your right. If he was here, I would have no problem cheering him on.
I was just adding my two sense beyond that static comparison. Considering fit and upside.
I know he is one of your long shot favorites. I can understand you might be defensive about other input. Just because I'm not doing back flips doesn't mean I think the idea sucks. There is a lot of grey between those two things.