dobrojim wrote:Dat2U wrote:This is the game that scares me. Especially since were home. I think Chicago has too much heart & fight to just lay down.
It's smart to have respect. CHI is not going to lay down, at least not until they get down 0-3
if that happens, and maybe not even then. But as you and others have pointed out, they
have a hard time summoning more than the maximal effort that they just normally play with.
When we match that, it's hard for them to win.
Wall hasn't really broken out yet. Or Gortat. And they have no one better than the
DPoY to check Nene.
I think Jim's comments are worth highlighting.
The Bulls modus operandi is merely to outwork, outgrind, and outhustle their opponents. Particularly in the absence of Rose (bad break for them) and Deng (who they *elected*, willfully, to trade away on their own -- no sympathy for them on that one). So I have to ask the broader group -- do the Bulls have yet another, higher, untapped gear in which to outwork and outgrind the Wizards? If not, how are they going to bridge the divide?
1. Perhaps via scheme. Can Tibbs come up with a new defensive scheme to limit the Wizards scoring? Given the Bulls relative weakness in putting points on the board, giving up over 100 ppg to the Wiz makes a Chicago victory difficult.
2. Perhaps via Wizards' complacency? This may be more hopeful than strategy. It appears that John Wall has a serious, committed attitude. Nene and the rest of the vets (Ariza comes to mind immediately) seem to be in a place where they're leading the focus and effort. Don't know if I'd count on this if I were Chicago.
I think the best the Bulls can hope for is a cold-shooting night by the Wiz -- all of them -- coupled with enough offense to get Chicago near 90 points.