Washington Wizards @ Milwaukee Bucks Game Thread (1-4-08)

Post #21 » by **nate33** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 8:42 pm

gilbertgoes05 wrote:
Haywood=Bogut- they'll cancel eachother out
Jamison>Yi- maybe someday Yi could beat him, but not now
Butler>Simmons- Butler is still a Wizard, Bobby isn't...nuff said
Stevenson?Bell- who knows what DBrick will show up
Daniels> Williams- Williams can shoot, but that's about it

The Haywood of this season is easily better than Bogut. Mo Williams is a much better player than Daniels though.

PG is their only matchup advantage. On paper, we are a better team.

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #22 » by **Buck You** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:01 am

Donkey McDonkerton wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Is redd better than Arenas? hhah jk...I know you dont think that anymore.

Did I say that? I don't remember that far back. I think Arenas and Redd are pretty similar but Arenas a 100% more clutch and poised. He also is a better team mate I would assume and is a pretty funny guy. Yeah, I'd rather have Arenas.

hands11 · Post #23 » by **hands11** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:03 am

Ruzious wrote:Milwaukee actually has some talent - at least offensively. They just don't have any focus - they don't play defense, and they don't play team ball. I think what they really need is a pure PG. Mo Williams is a talent, but he blends very poorly with the rest of the team.

Butler (a Racine, Wisconsin native) will have a monster game - as the 3 is the Bucks' weakest position.

Maybe they can run the Princeton. It doesnt need a PG :rofl:

Sorry, I couldnt help myself

hands11 · Post #24 » by **hands11** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:20 am

zaRdsAndZeRos wrote:dont underestimate them guys. there record is misleading. they are a much better team at home 9-4 i think. if redds out i think we can pull it out tho.

That's misunderestimate. Geez. Where did you go to school?

jerrod · Post #25 » by **jerrod** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:53 am

nate33 wrote: If they're cold, they can lose to anybody.

it's been a cold, cold winter

RMJ · Post #26 » by **RMJ** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:00 am

yahoo says redd is playing hopefully game channel is wrong this time

jerrod · Post #27 » by **jerrod** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:05 am

he's not

RMJ · Post #28 » by **RMJ** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:06 am

wermolwermol777 · Post #29 » by **wermolwermol777** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:23 am

For all it is worth - we are due to lose against a team we are supposed to win. Well there have been a couple of games we've lost that I think we could have easily won on another night, but we are still perfect against teams that we absolutely must beat.

As much as I don't want to see it happen tonight, I just have a bad feeling. If Redd isn't playing, we'll lose. And people start panicking

We are just due

closg00 · Post #30 » by **closg00** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:28 am

wermolwermol777 wrote:For all it is worth - we are due to lose against a team we are supposed to win. Well there have been a couple of games we've lost that I think we could have easily won on another night, but we are still perfect against teams that we absolutely must beat.

As much as I don't want to see it happen tonight, I just have a bad feeling. If Redd isn't playing, we'll lose. And people start panicking We are just due

I was thinking the same thing

hands11 · Post #31 » by **hands11** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:29 am

Ok, game time.

I want to say its ADs 2nd game back and with him at the helm we are going to play balanced ball and take this thing with great play from CB, AJ and the reast of the team.

My gut keep popping in to tell me EJ is going to play Songaila 20 mins and AB 5 along with other stupid coaching decisions and we loose because EJ regresses and coaches a crappy game.

WizBiz · Post #32 » by **WizBiz** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:48 am

Nice start by the Wizards. The Bucks are turning it over left and right.

gowiz999 · Post #33 » by **gowiz999** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:04 am

Good start but we need to get better shots on the offensive end.

wermolwermol777 · Post #34 » by **wermolwermol777** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:06 am

we should be up by 30...

Chocolate City Jordanaire · Post #35 » by **Chocolate City Jordanaire** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:10 am

Ruffin!

Post #36 » by **miller31time** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:10 am

I said we should beat them because they're a team we should be, but I didn't mean THIS bad.

Post #37 » by **miller31time** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:11 am

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Ruffin!

NOT POSSIBLE!

NOT POSSIBLE!

wermolwermol777 · Post #38 » by **wermolwermol777** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:12 am

miller31time wrote:I said we should beat them because they're a team we should be, but I didn't mean THIS bad.

after the first 5 minutes I made a bad attempt at a joke and said they were on pace to score 40 for the game...they are still on that pace :-?

Chocolate City Jordanaire · Post #39 » by **Chocolate City Jordanaire** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:13 am

EJ going small gives the Bucks hope, as Bogut posts up Songaila at C.

Chocolate City Jordanaire · Post #40 » by **Chocolate City Jordanaire** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:13 am

Andray won't play today, watch and see.