ImageImageImageImageImage

Jamison or Brand for Wiz, who would make this team better?

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

jamison or Brand (who'd make this team better)

Brand
8
47%
Jamison
9
53%
 
Total votes: 17

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,817
And1: 23,345
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

 

Post#21 » by nate33 » Sun Mar 2, 2008 9:19 pm

JWizmentality wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I'm not a cap Wiz, but 16mil off the books and we still wouldn't be able to pick him up?!?!?

We are currently about $12M over the cap. If we dump Jamison's $16M and factor in the standard 10.5% raises for most of our other players, we will still be right at the cap, maybe a million or two below.

We are most definitely NOT frontrunners for Brand. You really should try to take basic steps to understand the cap before making such blatantly false statements.
User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

 

Post#22 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Sun Mar 2, 2008 9:24 pm

MJG wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


You really think Blatche will be better than Brand in two years? Brand isn't even 30 yet, I don't think. I have a hard time picturing Blatche being that good.



I would too, with the way Blatche is playing as a 21 year old 7 footer. Let's face it, Brand is 6'8 and not a winner. He has always been on a losing team besides the one year Cassell got the Clips to the second round.
User avatar
gowiz999
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 29, 2006

 

Post#23 » by gowiz999 » Sun Mar 2, 2008 10:09 pm

nate33 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Worst. Post. Ever.

Not quite. His play has fallen off drastically over the last few months. No way I would re-sign him with the kind of money he is making.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,817
And1: 23,345
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

 

Post#24 » by nate33 » Sun Mar 2, 2008 10:57 pm

Nobody said he should be signed for $16M. He won't need to be paid that much. Nobody else is going to offer anything more than $8M. EG could probably sign him for that, perhaps a bit more.
Donkey McDonkerton
General Manager
Posts: 9,189
And1: 411
Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Location: Donkieville
     

 

Post#25 » by Donkey McDonkerton » Sun Mar 2, 2008 11:09 pm

gowiz999 wrote:Anyone but Jamison. He is no longer a capable starter in the NBA. If he was smart he'd go to the bench and extend his career.


You're a joke....seriously.
User avatar
Wizards2Lottery
RealGM
Posts: 10,317
And1: 26
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: All aboard the TANK

 

Post#26 » by Wizards2Lottery » Sun Mar 2, 2008 11:45 pm

fishercob wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I love Dray, but please. For his career, alltime blocks leader Hakeem Olajuwon averaged 3.1 bpg. He exceeded 4 bpg four times in his 17 year career.
:rofl: :rofl: you know i meant two
spaceman_E
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,681
And1: 81
Joined: Jun 14, 2006

 

Post#27 » by spaceman_E » Wed Mar 5, 2008 11:27 pm

Bottom line: Which brings us closer to a championship?


Doc, if you feel that our team when fully healthy next year could compete for a title then what you said is fine, otherwise changing a few players roles or having to add a few others to fit Brand's game isn't so much of a big deal.

Another question, would you guys be willing to move, say, Blatche and Daniels, maybe a pick too in a S/T if Brand stated he wanted to play for the Wiz and Wiz only? Remember that in sign and trades, teams are trying to get some value for their player instead of risk losing them for nothing as opposed to getting full value. We might have to add more contracts to even out the deal but basically Blatche and filler. We might not even have to lose Jamison in that scenario. AJ could find minutes off the bench as a 3/4 and we can go small ball with Brand sliding to C a few times a game. We are going to have to bite the bullet on the luxury tax sooner or later.
You don't win friends with salad.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,219
And1: 6,934
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

 

Post#28 » by doclinkin » Thu Mar 6, 2008 12:11 am

spaceman_E wrote:Bottom line: Which brings us closer to a championship?

Doc, if you feel that our team when fully healthy next year could compete for a title then what you said is fine, otherwise changing a few players roles or having to add a few others to fit Brand's game isn't so much of a big deal.


Eh, Brand or no Brand I dunno that we compete for a title next year. What I'm saying is, no matter what with a significant change of personnel, there's an adjustment. It's not fantasy leagues, not plug and play.

And realistically I don't see it happening. At all. Nerf GM-ery aside. If you think we're dropping Jamison, Team captain, our most consistent player, and one 2nd most durable player, who kept the team afloat all year, a favorite of our coach, and who is so valuable to the team he leads the league in +/- --if you think that this owner will refuse to pay him, or will swap him to a losing team? You batshxt crazy.

So make a virtue of necessity.

Could this team, fully healthy win the Championship? Fully healthy we could damn sure win the East. We've seen that when fully healthy even with a Jarvis/CalBooth bench we've had a historically incendiary offensive attack. For a stretch. WizKev's stats had us on a top 5 all-time pace. (Now granted, that was with the new ball...)

Even this year we've been competitive against the best in the game when we were missing only 1 allstar. We've gotten more talent for our bench. Got more bigtime experience for our rookies than a play-off-possible team usually gets. We're certifiably huge. And now we play defense.

And top it off our team has decent synergy with each other. Good mix of young vets and upcoming raw talents. Only thing we lack is a bit of playoff experience.

So. To me Jamison helps teach our young talent what to become. Brand maybe renders them redundant. I don't mind keeping Tawn for a couple years while he's still so consistent.

That said, naw, I'd never complain about landing Brand.
User avatar
BruceO
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,922
And1: 311
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Location: feeling monumental
   

 

Post#29 » by BruceO » Thu Mar 6, 2008 1:41 am

much is said about the plus and minus scores when jamison is on the floor, but realistically out of our big three if he's the one injured the team suffers much less than if Gil or Caron was injured. People say teams need time to develop chemistry but I no longer believe thats true if the players are good, look what Boston did, look what Gasol did when going to the lakers. So even if we are actually developing a great synergy right now, where is it going towards? Theres no reason to develop chemistry if we are not getting towards a championship based on the combination of players. I always discuss Jamison because I think hes our best asset on the players market, a market that I thought had another viable free agent next year but Nate tells me we dont have enough to acquire him. I mean in all honesty, what kind of changes can we make to have that team, where when it peaks, we are definately a contender?
Benjammin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,504
And1: 650
Joined: Jan 18, 2003

 

Post#30 » by Benjammin » Thu Mar 6, 2008 2:01 am

The major thing that I get from this thread is that evidently not very many people have seen Elton Brand play. One can try to make a sophisticated argument about spacing and the value of Jamison. However, if people actually appreciated what kind of player Elton Brand is (assuming health) this would not even be an argument.

Elton Brand is at least above average in every area a PF can be measured except 3 point shooting. These arguments about him not being a winner ignore the team he has played on and the conference in which he plays.

With Brand and Haywood together the Wizards would have one of the best interior defense combos in the NBA. Brand is a very efficient scorer. He has a lot of Wes Unseld in him combined with scoring ability. He would give the Wizards a legitimate low post scorer, a player who would demand frequent double teaming.

In all likelihood, the Wizards couldn't get him anyway, but to read the posts of so many people in this thread makes me believe that people think basketball is simply played on one end of the court. His height is immaterial; he has long arms and plays much taller than his height.

We're talking about Antawn Jamison people. I loved his leadership when Pat Riley iso-ed Udonis freaking Haslem to take him to school. Jamison is an efficient scorer, a good guy, a good locker room guy, a "leader", a "mentor", but he is not in Brand's league as an all around player.

One can try to do mental gyrations to convince oneself that the Wizards situation (offensive style of play, composition of roster, young players) makes Jamison equally valuable to Brand. However, that's what one is doing, mental gyrations. Brand is the type of guy that playing with quality players would be a key part of a championship squad. Jamison would be a guy as a 6th man who could be an important piece on a championship squad. That's a significant and fundamental difference.
User avatar
BruceO
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,922
And1: 311
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Location: feeling monumental
   

 

Post#31 » by BruceO » Thu Mar 6, 2008 2:28 am

I love that post benjamin :clap:
User avatar
gowiz999
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 29, 2006

 

Post#32 » by gowiz999 » Thu Mar 6, 2008 4:29 am

BruceO wrote:I love that post benjamin :clap:


Me too. Yes, AJ is a good guy but there are clearly better options out there in terms of actual basketball performance.

Winning Championships > Nice guys

I am so sick of AJ shooting 6/19 every night to go along with terrible defense. :x
miller31time
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,583
And1: 2,152
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
     

 

Post#33 » by miller31time » Thu Mar 6, 2008 5:23 am

Benjammin wrote:The major thing that I get from this thread is that evidently not very many people have seen Elton Brand play. One can try to make a sophisticated argument about spacing and the value of Jamison. However, if people actually appreciated what kind of player Elton Brand is (assuming health) this would not even be an argument.

Elton Brand is at least above average in every area a PF can be measured except 3 point shooting. These arguments about him not being a winner ignore the team he has played on and the conference in which he plays.

With Brand and Haywood together the Wizards would have one of the best interior defense combos in the NBA. Brand is a very efficient scorer. He has a lot of Wes Unseld in him combined with scoring ability. He would give the Wizards a legitimate low post scorer, a player who would demand frequent double teaming.

In all likelihood, the Wizards couldn't get him anyway, but to read the posts of so many people in this thread makes me believe that people think basketball is simply played on one end of the court. His height is immaterial; he has long arms and plays much taller than his height.

We're talking about Antawn Jamison people. I loved his leadership when Pat Riley iso-ed Udonis freaking Haslem to take him to school. Jamison is an efficient scorer, a good guy, a good locker room guy, a "leader", a "mentor", but he is not in Brand's league as an all around player.

One can try to do mental gyrations to convince oneself that the Wizards situation (offensive style of play, composition of roster, young players) makes Jamison equally valuable to Brand. However, that's what one is doing, mental gyrations. Brand is the type of guy that playing with quality players would be a key part of a championship squad. Jamison would be a guy as a 6th man who could be an important piece on a championship squad. That's a significant and fundamental difference.


Agreed with everything except the part about AJ not being a capable starter on a championship squad. I would have been the first person to agree with you last year, but he's actually show competence on defense this year, and isn't the embarrassment he once was. Whether this is due to a new contract looming around the corner, or because of Ayers, the man has simply stepped up the D. I now feel he can be a valuable contributor as a starter on a title team.

But yeah, the lack of a three point shot from Brand is being looked at too closely in this thread. Yes, Jamison's ability to hit the 3 and stretch the defense is important and a nice asset, but it pales in comparison to the new attributes Brand would bring to this team. We're talking about one of the top defenders in the NBA at the power forward spot. We're talking about a ridiculously efficient and effective post up player and mid-range jump-shooter. We're talking about an MVP-caliber player being added to a team with Arenas and Butler. Oh, and it doesn't hurt that he, like Jamison, is also one of the most respected players in the league and a great person on and off the court.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,219
And1: 6,934
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

 

Post#34 » by doclinkin » Fri Mar 7, 2008 1:22 am

Benjammin wrote:The major thing that I get from this thread is that evidently not very many people have seen Elton Brand play. One can try to make a sophisticated argument about spacing and the value of Jamison. However, if people actually appreciated what kind of player Elton Brand is (assuming health) this would not even be an argument.


'People' is me. I've seen him play. A healthy Brand is a better player than Tawn. Not my argument.

But you're missing a nuance or two here, I'll try to put a finer point on it:

1. Jamison plays for the Wizards. The Wizards play for Abe Pollin.

We've had 20+ years where 'mediocre' would have been a godsend. Where good talent had bad character, lousy chemistry, or injury problems. 'Leadership' was a puddle of hotdog puke, or sitting out a mild strain while Chris Whitney played on two broken ankles. Or a DWI or two. Or getting busted for possession.

Then we got Jamison. And started winning. Next to no games missed for injury. Public responsibility, public involvement, playoffs.

Again: Jamison plays for Abe Pollin. Abe Pollin overpaid to keep a good character guy like Etan when Milwaukee called Ernie's bluff (that the team would keep him no matter what). What's the 'loyalty price' for a guy who rescued you from firing the Greatest Player of All Time, wiped the 'laughingstock' off the franchise name, and brought you the first playoff win in more than two decades?

2. The only way Jamison is going anywhere other than the Wizards is if he wants to go. In that case, he is free to go and gets us nothing.

Or we engineer a sign and trade (exceed the cap, bring back equivalent talent).

The mental gyrations on landing Brand in a S&T are an Olympic pommelhorse routine compared to the concept that Jamison improves the Wiz. You gonna try a double sign & trade with Brand opting out of a guaranteed 16 mil following an injury year since Jamison wants out and agrees to go to the Clip jobs because they'd what... land him a championship? You can try but you ain't landing that dismount.

Abe will pay to keep Jamison. And, key point: Jamison actually thinks we'll win a championship here.

So long as we retain Arenas. And even then I think he'd scowl on the disloyalty of Gil going elsewhere and leaving the team behind. And would still believe we'd win anyway without him, and would stick around.

Unless the Team said to him 'Tawn, we'd like to go in a different direction, what other teams would you be willing to play for, we'll try to arrange something and maybe benefit us both'. But again: see 1) above. He's not going anywhere.


3. Given 1 & 2. Those grapes were probably pretty sour anyway.

Does Tawn hurt our team? He does not. He helps this team more than any other player in the league helps their team. Even when Caron Butler was an all-star lock, 'Tawn was more significant to the team.

He's as consistent as you get. Not just by notching those 20/10's. Consider also the 40 minutes per game. The number of games per year.

Nate's player-pairs regression in past years confirmed that whatever his problems were on defense, Jamison significantly improved the offense of the players on the floor with him. More than any other Wiz player. All without notching an assist or frankly ever passing. The FG%, eFG% (and in some cases free throw attempts) of most players all rose when Jamison was on the floor. Again: more than any other player, Jamison made both Caron and Gilbert more efficient. That's saying something meaningful.

And whatever 'Haslem' you had last year-- this year Jamison is more significant to his team's DEFENSE than all but 9 other players in the league.

Check it. Who's that guy just behind Shawn MFn Marion? Team Captain, no nickname, the gentleman Antawn Jamison.

Nevermind that a long-armed defensive shotblocking octopus like Blatche is playing behind him. Nevermind that Tawn is playing long minutes with Haywood off the court. His defense is not only better than past years, but as far as the Wizard's improved defensive schemes, he's Top 10 most significant to his team's defensive success.

Saying something.

So. Whatever lust for Brand you harbor in your hearts, statsheet or pants, understand only this:

Jamison's effect on this team and it's overall chemistry is massively underestimated and taken for granted. You can 'speckalate' that this, that, or the other player might be better than Tawn, but the facts sit there throbbing in digital type, no player league-wide is more significant to the success of their team than Jamison has been to this one. And playing with chemistry is dangerous. Better know what you're doing. Ask Pheonix.

So if we're likely to keep him, personally, I got no problem with that. Seems pretty clear to me he helps more than he hurts. That's something to work with. The rest, Brand or whatnot, that's mostly just roster masturbation.
Benjammin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,504
And1: 650
Joined: Jan 18, 2003

 

Post#35 » by Benjammin » Fri Mar 7, 2008 2:33 am

Doc, you certainly used a lot of words. I said myself it was a moot point (your roster masturbation point). I stand by what I already posted. If you think that Jamison can hold Brand's jock then you're certainly entitled to hold such an opinion, and I'll defend to the death your right to be wrong.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,230
And1: 8,061
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

 

Post#36 » by Dat2U » Fri Mar 7, 2008 3:13 am

doclinkin wrote:
'People' is me. I've seen him play. A healthy Brand is a better player than Tawn. Not my argument.

But you're missing a nuance or two here, I'll try to put a finer point on it:

1. Jamison plays for the Wizards. The Wizards play for Abe Pollin.

We've had 20+ years where 'mediocre' would have been a godsend. Where good talent had bad character, lousy chemistry, or injury problems. 'Leadership' was a puddle of hotdog puke, or sitting out a mild strain while Chris Whitney played on two broken ankles. Or a DWI or two. Or getting busted for possession.

Then we got Jamison. And started winning. Next to no games missed for injury. Public responsibility, public involvement, playoffs.

Again: Jamison plays for Abe Pollin. Abe Pollin overpaid to keep a good character guy like Etan when Milwaukee called Ernie's bluff (that the team would keep him no matter what). What's the 'loyalty price' for a guy who rescued you from firing the Greatest Player of All Time, wiped the 'laughingstock' off the franchise name, and brought you the first playoff win in more than two decades?


I don't disagree with the point your making. Abe loves Jamison and probably views him as his favorite current Wizard. However Jamison's been making in upwards of $16-17 mil per season since he's been in DC. I'm not sure what "loyalty price" needs to be paid going forward considering he's been far and away the highest paid Wizard the last 4 seasons. But I have no doubt that EG will pay for loyalty this off-season, and maybe Abe has a role in that decision. That's one of the reasons I find the notion that Jamison will only get $8 mil per this off-season a bit ridiculous.

doclinkin wrote:2. The only way Jamison is going anywhere other than the Wizards is if he wants to go. In that case, he is free to go and gets us nothing.

Or we engineer a sign and trade (exceed the cap, bring back equivalent talent).

The mental gyrations on landing Brand in a S&T are an Olympic pommelhorse routine compared to the concept that Jamison improves the Wiz. You gonna try a double sign & trade with Brand opting out of a guaranteed 16 mil following an injury year since Jamison wants out and agrees to go to the Clip jobs because they'd what... land him a championship? You can try but you ain't landing that dismount.

Abe will pay to keep Jamison. And, key point: Jamison actually thinks we'll win a championship here.

So long as we retain Arenas. And even then I think he'd scowl on the disloyalty of Gil going elsewhere and leaving the team behind. And would still believe we'd win anyway without him, and would stick around.

Unless the Team said to him 'Tawn, we'd like to go in a different direction, what other teams would you be willing to play for, we'll try to arrange something and maybe benefit us both'. But again: see 1) above. He's not going anywhere.


Agree here too. Any deal for Jamison would have had to have taken place prior to the trade deadline. Personally I thought we missed our shot when the Lakers got Gasol so cheaply, when the Wizards could have offered better talent and better picks. I'm not sure if Brand was available, but the 0.5% chance to grab him would have been a few weeks ago where a package of players & picks might have been enough to sway the Clips if they were really worried he might opt out...and there's serious whispers out of LA that he might.

Like or not, we either gotta re-sign Jamison or likely lose him for nothing. However I'm not worried about him going elsewhere, the money in free agency just isn't there. I'm more worried about EG & Abe "rewarding" him beyond what's necessary. Although I think both Gil & Jamison will return next year, I suspect that Jamison is closer to a 100% lock than Gil.

doclinkin wrote:3. Given 1 & 2. Those grapes were probably pretty sour anyway.

Does Tawn hurt our team? He does not. He helps this team more than any other player in the league helps their team. Even when Caron Butler was an all-star lock, 'Tawn was more significant to the team.

He's as consistent as you get. Not just by notching those 20/10's. Consider also the 40 minutes per game. The number of games per year.

Nate's player-pairs regression in past years confirmed that whatever his problems were on defense, Jamison significantly improved the offense of the players on the floor with him. More than any other Wiz player. All without notching an assist or frankly ever passing. The FG%, eFG% (and in some cases free throw attempts) of most players all rose when Jamison was on the floor. Again: more than any other player, Jamison made both Caron and Gilbert more efficient. That's saying something meaningful.

And whatever 'Haslem' you had last year-- this year Jamison is more significant to his team's DEFENSE than all but 9 other players in the league.

Check it. Who's that guy just behind Shawn MFn Marion? Team Captain, no nickname, the gentleman Antawn Jamison.

Nevermind that a long-armed defensive shotblocking octopus like Blatche is playing behind him. Nevermind that Tawn is playing long minutes with Haywood off the court. His defense is not only better than past years, but as far as the Wizard's improved defensive schemes, he's Top 10 most significant to his team's defensive success.

Saying something.

So. Whatever lust for Brand you harbor in your hearts, statsheet or pants, understand only this:

Jamison's effect on this team and it's overall chemistry is massively underestimated and taken for granted. You can 'speckalate' that this, that, or the other player might be better than Tawn, but the facts sit there throbbing in digital type, no player league-wide is more significant to the success of their team than Jamison has been to this one. And playing with chemistry is dangerous. Better know what you're doing. Ask Pheonix.

So if we're likely to keep him, personally, I got no problem with that. Seems pretty clear to me he helps more than he hurts. That's something to work with. The rest, Brand or whatnot, that's mostly just roster masturbation.


Here's where I disagree with you and your use of your stats. Jamison's importance to the Wizards is relative to the fact that there's such a wide gap b/w Jamison and the team's fourth best player (Haywood IMO). There's even a wider gap b/w Jamison and the Wizards fourth best scoring option (Stevenson? Mason? Blatche? I'm not sure). And there's even a greater gap b/w Jamison and his supposed backup, Darius Songaila.

Jamison's defense has improved this year, but lets not go crazy here. Watching the game, its still evident that Jamison has more than his fair share of struggles on the defensive end. His best asset defensively is ability to grab defensive boards, which he's done a great job this year, but outside of that, its not uncommon to see Jamison still give up easy baskets with regularity. He's improved from being one of the worst defenders in the league, but I still wouldn't hesitate to say he's a poor defender.

When Jamison is out the game the defense does take a hit. Why? Often his replacement is Darius Songaila who has proven not only to be incapable of defending anyone, but he's also a terrible rebounder as well.

When Jamison is out the game the offense also takes a hit. Because there's no quality scoring option to replace him. Nothing against Stevenson, Mason or Blatche, but none of these guys are capable or as Blatche is concerned, ready to fill that void. Each may have good games, but they lack the efficiency or consistency to be a consistent scoring threat.

So yes, Jamison is very important to the roster, but in my view, that's more reflective of the fact the roster is still top heavy rather than Jamison being some irreplaceable part of the team. Our 3 main scoring options are still light years better than anyone else on the roster. The difference is just so great, that when you take Jamison out, your going to get a huge drop-off, especially considering his replacement on the bench has been awful for most of the year until a recent stretch.

I think you and alot of others have made Jamison out to be something he's not. As a 2nd/3rd option, rebounder by default, and a key contributor he's certainly an important part of the roster. As someone who's become untouchable in trade talks, invaluable b/c of his leadership, winning attitude and ability to spread the D with his shooting, etc, etc. I think he's become a tad overrated by Wizards management and by much this board in general.

Also I just gotta say, I'd take a true low post threat at PF over a jump shooting, junk shooting pseudo PF any day of the week. That's weak argument if I ever saw one.
User avatar
Zerocious
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,784
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 17, 2006
Location: Wizards purgatory

 

Post#37 » by Zerocious » Fri Mar 7, 2008 3:58 am

sorry, i'm posting this without having read all previous posts....

but if we would sign brand in stead of jamison, would this mean jamison goes to the clips? if not then the clips would have room to pay gilbert and might lure him to his hometown. i know won't happen, ivan said so, but just food for thought
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,219
And1: 6,934
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

 

Post#38 » by doclinkin » Fri Mar 7, 2008 7:56 pm

Dat2U wrote: I'm not sure what "loyalty price" needs to be paid going forward considering he's been far and away the highest paid Wizard the last 4 seasons. But I have no doubt that EG will pay for loyalty this off-season, and maybe Abe has a role in that decision. That's one of the reasons I find the notion that Jamison will only get $8 mil per this off-season a bit ridiculous.


Eh, by loyalty price I only mean that Erndawg will sign AJ for whatever price the market offers, and a little more. How much is that? Dunno. What's 'Tawn worth league-wide... Who else likely thinks he has value? 20/10 looks good and all but no matter who's out there, I'm not sure I'll get a ton of argument by saying he's worth more to the Wiz than for most any other team.

The key thing in the Tawn re-sign is Gilbert's market. He'll get a good deal, but nothing crazy.


Dat2U wrote:

Here's where I disagree with you and your use of your stats. Jamison's importance to the Wizards is relative to the fact that there's such a wide gap b/w Jamison and the team's fourth best player (Haywood IMO). There's even a wider gap b/w Jamison and the Wizards fourth best scoring option (Stevenson? Mason? Blatche? I'm not sure). And there's even a greater gap b/w Jamison and his supposed backup, Darius Songaila.

Jamison's defense has improved this year, but lets not go crazy here. Watching the game, its still evident that Jamison has more than his fair share of struggles on the defensive end. His best asset defensively is ability to grab defensive boards, which he's done a great job this year, but outside of that, its not uncommon to see Jamison still give up easy baskets with regularity. He's improved from being one of the worst defenders in the league, but I still wouldn't hesitate to say he's a poor defender.

When Jamison is out the game the defense does take a hit. Why? Often his replacement is Darius Songaila who has proven not only to be incapable of defending anyone, but he's also a terrible rebounder as well.


You know, I'd be inclined to agree with you on Darius' defense, but the stats say something else. Those same +/- stats have Darius worth -1.5 on defense. That is, the opposing team scores 1.5 points less when he's out there. (Equivalent to say, Paul Pierce or Luke Walton). Not arguing that he's even a competent defender, just saying that's apparently not factor in calculating Jamison's defensive +/- on this team, this year.

Really prob'ly the single biggest factor in that rating is EJ's habit of playing the 'bench dump' line-up with our rooks and noobs on the floor together trying to figure out what they're doing. A seeming defensive talent like Blatche shows pretty poorly in the defensive +/- giving up +5 points out there. I blame Nick Young.

But whatever the reason it's tough to say Jamison's hurting the team on defense when lines that feature him are 5 points better defensively-- in a year when the improved overall defense is a key reason for our ability to keep afloat.

Again, my argument isn't that Jamison is better than Brand. It's that his contribution to the team is overlooked and underappreciated -- over and above the 20/10 stas he inks night in night out. So, 'sour grapes' [my phrase] or no, I think we can keep him and not just hold the line (sub .500 ballclub) but continue to improve. He's not the guy keeping us back.

And shoot, if we re-sign him to a decent wage and it doesn't work, or as young talent outgrows him, there's nothing saying he couldn't still be a key piece in a future trade. He'll maintain his value even if he slides to a bench role in a couple years.
User avatar
Wizards2Lottery
RealGM
Posts: 10,317
And1: 26
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: All aboard the TANK

 

Post#39 » by Wizards2Lottery » Sat Mar 8, 2008 1:51 am

Anyone else sick of Jamisons contested threes and wild runners? Hes a good character version of Zach Randolph.

Different games but they chuck horrible shots to no limit.
Donkey McDonkerton
General Manager
Posts: 9,189
And1: 411
Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Location: Donkieville
     

 

Post#40 » by Donkey McDonkerton » Sat Mar 8, 2008 2:00 am

Gilbert0Arenas wrote:Anyone else sick of Jamisons contested threes and wild runners? Hes a good character version of Zach Randolph.

Different games but they chuck horrible shots to no limit.


I like AJ, I just wish he would pass up the shots when he is off. If he hits a few, then fine, keep taking them......I just dont think starting off 1-9 is ever a good idea. Once you are 1-5ish you should look to pass until you can get easy lay-ins or dOnks to get you going.

Roger is our 3pt shooter right now.

Return to Washington Wizards