Halcyon wrote:
If there is a better deal out there, I will eat my words. However, my guess is that it will most likely be a combination of players (very similar to Okafor + Ariza, mid-level veteran players who are overpaid) and unless both players are on the caliber of Blatche (player wise and contract wise) I don't see how we get assets back. Since Okafor and Ariza aren't chopped liver like Rashard (and have very favorable deals for flexibility next year), we didn't get additional assets back.
I want to see concrete trades for Rashard that actually work for both sides, and less of this theoretical "flexibility" which might not even exist.
The only teams I can think of off the top of my head are Memphis and Houston. Luis Scola, Rudy Gay, maybe Z-Bo, Kevin Martin. But then you ask yourself, we're probably not gonna get any of those guys for Lewis straight up. Their contracts are probably longer than 2 years (again I can check), and to trade for a guy like Gay would mean trading our lottery pick.
So we could do nothing like Dat suggested, have all this cap space, overpay for a middle tier free agent and complain that this is the exact same move that got us in cap hell years ago. Or make a move like this, that isn't popular, people are going to complain about it anyway,, but at least it's something and it doesn't hurt the team long term anyway.