ImageImageImageImageImage

Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
GhostsOfGil
General Manager
Posts: 8,506
And1: 899
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#221 » by GhostsOfGil » Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:07 pm

Zonkerbl wrote:He doesn't have to stay in front -- just force them to the sidelines, into the teeth of our frontcourt d.


But, Wall has trouble with both. With quicker guards, there are times where they just blow by him. Sometimes he looks like the second coming of Gary Payton but there have been a few games where he consistently, cannot contain the dribble penetration (Philly game is the one im thinking of specifically).
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#222 » by hands11 » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:17 am

That MIL game from Wall was a beautiful thing.

I can live with some of the turnovers. 2 were late in the game when he is was show boating a little by trying to make really complicated dribbling moves. They weren't needed but they didn't hurt.

But what he did that I was calling for and loved to see was .. he took no outside shots. He kept his dribble alive more and he only shot floaters and at the rim baskets. 10 assists. 14 pts.

5-6 shooting. 6 FTA and made 4 after missing his first 2. Wall has been solid at the line this year.

Not sure how to calculate eff on my own but I would like to see his rating for that game.

Very nice. Keep it up John. Very Rondo type of game which is exactly what you should be doing.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#223 » by Nivek » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:43 am

Even with the 5-6 shooting, Wall's ortg was just 103 because of the 7 turnovers.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,390
And1: 5,094
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#224 » by tontoz » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:50 am

Some of these TOs have been really careless. I am wondering (or maybe hoping) that fatigue may be playing a role.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
B-easy
Starter
Posts: 2,184
And1: 690
Joined: Apr 08, 2010

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#225 » by B-easy » Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:08 am

I think its because he has poor handles, his dribble is way too high so he can be easily picked when driving in the half court.

I really think improving his handles (and therefore To's) is more important than his jumpshot.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#226 » by hands11 » Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:45 am

Nivek wrote:Even with the 5-6 shooting, Wall's ortg was just 103 because of the 7 turnovers.


But what about eFT% and TS%

I should have been more specific when I said efficiency. I meant shooting efficiency.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#227 » by hands11 » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:03 am

B-easy wrote:I think its because he has poor handles, his dribble is way too high so he can be easily picked when driving in the half court.

I really think improving his handles (and therefore To's) is more important than his jumpshot.


I don't think he has poor handles at all but I do think you will see them improve. At least I do if he appears more games like he did that last one where he didn't shoot from outside.

Two TOs were down the stretch where like I said, he was show boating a little. Trying to burn time on the clock and feeling his oat a little.

Another Ellis just grabbed his left arm and spun him off balance.

So there are 3 of them off the top of my head.

He keep his dribble alive a lot more last night because he wasn't shooting the J. He made an insanely highly skilled move down the middle where he crossed through his legs in a crowed lane and then instantly went to the hoop. That was a insanely sweet move.

If Wall keep up this approach of not shooting nearly as many jumpers, I think you are going to see his ball handling skills on display and they are going to start to really shin. I can't remember a game where he tried to move the defense like that just by dribbling and moving around.

Give it a few games. I think we are going to see some :o from Wall with the ball in his hands.

I think he has figured out the way to national recognition is

1) Winning
2) Lots of assists and making the game easier for other. i.e. Making his teammates better.
3) Defense and break away highlights
4) Efficient scoring
5) Amazing handles where he moves the defense for scoring highlight by others.
6) Amazing handles that lead to drives for himself.

HE DOESN'T NEED AN OUTSIDE SHOT RIGHT NOW TO BE GREAT
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#228 » by dangermouse » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:35 am

What are his stats on shots from within say 12-14 feet? Basically the area inside or near-to the paint. This would exclude his jump shots from slightly further out (15+ feet).

His floater has been money this year. It feels like that is a whole new dimension he has added to his game now. Has he improved from that range?
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#229 » by rockymac52 » Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:22 am

dangermouse wrote:What are his stats on shots from within say 12-14 feet? Basically the area inside or near-to the paint. This would exclude his jump shots from slightly further out (15+ feet).

His floater has been money this year. It feels like that is a whole new dimension he has added to his game now. Has he improved from that range?


The big change in Wall's shooting so far this season has been his improvement from 3-9 feet.

Obviously, it's a relatively small sample size, so don't overreact one way or the other.

2011: 30.5% from 3-9 ft
2012: 28.3% from 3-9 ft
2013: 45.5% from 3-9 ft

However, there's equally bad news for him this season from 10-15 feet. He went from 28%, to 32.1%, to now 17.6% this season.

Decide for yourself how much weight you want to put on this due to the sample size.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#230 » by Nivek » Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:19 pm

hands11 wrote:
Nivek wrote:Even with the 5-6 shooting, Wall's ortg was just 103 because of the 7 turnovers.


But what about eFT% and TS%

I should have been more specific when I said efficiency. I meant shooting efficiency.


I have no idea what eFT% is.

Wall's efg in that single game is .833 (same his FG% because there were no threes). His TS% was .810.

Turnovers are part of offensive efficiency, though. And they're a big problem with Wall. Even in this game where he made shots, he still had too many zero-point possessions.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,390
And1: 5,094
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#231 » by tontoz » Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:28 pm

I hear that MDG has a really good EFT%.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#232 » by Nivek » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:37 pm

Up at the blog: a look at how the Wizards are better on offense with Wall.

Summary: teammates shoot slightly better and dramatically reduce turnovers.

Also: Offense could be far better still if Wall would improve his shooting and reduce his turnovers. He's committing 38% of the team's turnovers when he's in the game.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,238
And1: 22,650
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#233 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:27 pm

Nivek wrote:Up at the blog: a look at how the Wizards are better on offense with Wall.

Summary: teammates shoot slightly better and dramatically reduce turnovers.

Also: Offense could be far better still if Wall would improve his shooting and reduce his turnovers. He's committing 38% of the team's turnovers when he's in the game.

Great stuff, Nivek. It's a perfect summary of why Wall is so helpful, yet so frustrating.

Is it reasonable to expect a PG to dramatically reduce his turnover rate in his 4th season and beyond? Or is this the Wall we can expect to see for the rest of his career - a dynamic player but way too mistake-prone?
Halcyon
Veteran
Posts: 2,847
And1: 493
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#234 » by Halcyon » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:30 pm

I found one split interesting, which were the quarter splits:

1st: 57.1 % (http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... &quarter=1)
2nd: 37.9% (http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... &quarter=2)
3rd: 45.1% (http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... &quarter=3)
4th: 37.3% (http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... &quarter=4)

It seems like being out of shape may be affecting his shooting. For example, in the first quarter he's shooting at around 46.4% (13/28) on jumpers but come 4th quarter, he's shooting a horrendous 21.1% (8/38). This might be a sample size issue, but it'll be interesting to track if his 2nd and 4th quarter splits improve over the course of the season.
miller31time
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,577
And1: 2,143
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
     

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#235 » by miller31time » Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:24 pm

Halcyon wrote:I found one split interesting, which were the quarter splits:

1st: 57.1 % (http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... &quarter=1)
2nd: 37.9% (http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... &quarter=2)
3rd: 45.1% (http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... &quarter=3)
4th: 37.3% (http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... &quarter=4)

It seems like being out of shape may be affecting his shooting. For example, in the first quarter he's shooting at around 46.4% (13/28) on jumpers but come 4th quarter, he's shooting a horrendous 21.1% (8/38). This might be a sample size issue, but it'll be interesting to track if his 2nd and 4th quarter splits improve over the course of the season.


Nice find, Halcyon.

I also think rhythm has a lot to do with it. Take last game against Milwaukee for instance. Wall was having a fantastic game until he was benched near the end of the 3rd quarter. Wittman let him rot on the bench until about the 3-minute mark of the 4th. Hard for a player to sit for that long, then come in and be the same force he was earlier in the game.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#236 » by Nivek » Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:41 pm

nate33 wrote:
Nivek wrote:Up at the blog: a look at how the Wizards are better on offense with Wall.

Summary: teammates shoot slightly better and dramatically reduce turnovers.

Also: Offense could be far better still if Wall would improve his shooting and reduce his turnovers. He's committing 38% of the team's turnovers when he's in the game.

Great stuff, Nivek. It's a perfect summary of why Wall is so helpful, yet so frustrating.

Is it reasonable to expect a PG to dramatically reduce his turnover rate in his 4th season and beyond? Or is this the Wall we can expect to see for the rest of his career - a dynamic player but way too mistake-prone?


I'd want to do some research on this before answering definitively. Just eyeballing some of the "similar" players, it looks like a mixed bag. Most appear to reduce their turnovers as they gain experience, but the changes appear to be fairly small. It's also interesting that Wall's turnovers have risen each year of his career thus far.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,585
And1: 3,014
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#237 » by pancakes3 » Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:51 pm

I think the interest and analysis of Wall's jumper to be fascinating and worthwhile but at the same time think that he does not necessarily need to improve his jumper in order to improve overall. He can still cut down on his TO's and play more like Rondo, and to emulate the finishing and change-of-pace of Wade/Rose. The jumper would be great but I think secondary to decision making and "playmaking" (for lack of a better word).

He has great vision on the break, but I wish he had better vision in the half-court. I do think he's improving though. One play that stuck out was his cross-court to Beal for 3 on a drive. 2 years ago, he would have forced the issue, get caught too far under the rim, and then try to abort only to turn it over.
Bullets -> Wizards
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,390
And1: 5,094
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#238 » by tontoz » Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:21 pm

The Rondo comparison doesn't really work because Rondo did improve his shot significantly and he was surrounded by 3 HOF players.

On a more sympathetic note there was a lockout last year and he was out hurt a long time this year which probably hurt his performance.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#239 » by hands11 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:25 am

Nivek wrote:
hands11 wrote:
Nivek wrote:Even with the 5-6 shooting, Wall's ortg was just 103 because of the 7 turnovers.


But what about eFT% and TS%

I should have been more specific when I said efficiency. I meant shooting efficiency.


I have no idea what eFT% is.

Wall's efg in that single game is .833 (same his FG% because there were no threes). His TS% was .810.

Turnovers are part of offensive efficiency, though. And they're a big problem with Wall. Even in this game where he made shots, he still had too many zero-point possessions.


eFT is a type. eFG was what I was talking about which you figured out.

.833 eFG. I can live with a few move games like that.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 2.0 

Post#240 » by hands11 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:27 am

nate33 wrote:
Nivek wrote:Up at the blog: a look at how the Wizards are better on offense with Wall.

Summary: teammates shoot slightly better and dramatically reduce turnovers.

Also: Offense could be far better still if Wall would improve his shooting and reduce his turnovers. He's committing 38% of the team's turnovers when he's in the game.

Great stuff, Nivek. It's a perfect summary of why Wall is so helpful, yet so frustrating.

Is it reasonable to expect a PG to dramatically reduce his turnover rate in his 4th season and beyond? Or is this the Wall we can expect to see for the rest of his career - a dynamic player but way too mistake-prone?


I wouldn't be looking at his 4th season as much as the 2nd half of this one. That is the sample to compare against.

Return to Washington Wizards