Nivek wrote:payitforward wrote:
If the choice is between Porter and Oladipo, I pick Porter again. YODA ranks him very high, and in fact he was tremendously productive. But he's a year older than Porter -- run those YODA numbers again using his Sophomore stats and you'll like them a lot less.
I'd have no problem picking Porter over Oladipo. Porter rates better sophomore year to sophomore year. Oladipo as a sophomore rated as a late lottery pick. Which is also where he rated as a freshman. He played MUCH better in his junior year, of course.
In addition there's a possible Zeller effect, the possibility that teams knew to concentrate on the interior to shut him down, freeing Oladipo to play freer on the outside. By contrast Porter was pretty much all of GTown's production, but still managed efficient production. Just one theory to d1ck around with and monkeywrench the pet homebrew metric. A correction not for strength of schedule but strength of teammates

a synergy correction. Just a thought.
That said I still like Dipo a little better than Porter. Porter just seems to fit the chemistry and scheme and minutes available to play with our core more often. That would be drafting for need not best player. Long term I think Dipo may prove a better player at 2-3 than Porter at 3. But you can win with either of them, so I'll shrug and accept whomever.
I just would prefer to trade back a little and still pick a needed talent and add something else. Get greedy.