Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:pancakes3 wrote:Speaking of Atlanta, I hope Mike Scott's value continues to be depressed. He is going to be a very solid rotation guy for someone eventually. In fact, I think he'd do very well as a stretch 4 for us if we can somehow trick the hawks into some sort of trade.
Severn Hoos was the first guy I recall mentioning how good UVA's Mike Scott is. I don't see enough ACC games out here, and Mike Scott seemed to me to come out of nowhere to becoming a really good prospect. I had no clue about the guy but once Sev mentioned him I learned.
Yeah, pancakes3, I agree with you that he's a player the Wizards can use.
I think Mike Scott has range and he can be a low-cost, Carl Landry-type player. I would love for the Wizards to have a guy with that skill set in their playing rotation.
Aww shucks, nice to be remembered....
Funny think about Mike Scott - and I loved having him as a Cav (not the thugs from Cleveland, the real Cavaliers). He got an injury redshirt, so was a 5-year college player. And with the talk about McGary or Mclemore or whoever being "overaged", you might think that I'd be down on him as a prospect. Well, I do think it's becoming almost an absolute rule that guys who don't dominate their peers before they turn 20 will never be a true star in the NBA.
But the corollary is that guys who develop late or stay in school tend to become very good role players in the NBA. The extra years of hands-on coaching - if they're willing to listen and put in the work their coaches ask of them - helps them to play "smarter" than the guys who didn't get that extra time of instruction.
I wasn't against Thomas Robinson as a prospect, I was against Robinson as a top-5 pick. I always thought he'd be a decent role player / hustle guy / rebounder - kind of a high octane Reggie Evans. But a stud, cornerstone piece? No way. And that was almost entirely because of the fact that he couldn't force his way onto the court his first two seasons. But take his teammate Jeff Withey - I'd have been all over him with the #38 pick, because I think he'll be a very solid role player, and represents a great value at that slot.
You can keep your Derrick Williams and Wesley Johnsons and Hilton Armstrongs and Jordan Hills and so on - guys who had "breakout years" as older prospects and then got drafted higher than they should. But those 4- (and 5-) year players make great, cheap 15 minute per game role players and specialists.
So yep, let's bring in Mike Scott. Maybe I'll go watch an old episode of The Office, for old time's sake.
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose