stevemcqueen1 wrote:jangles86 wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Wall at 5
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_ ... position/1
Beal - uh, hmmm
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_ ... position/2
Gortat - what?
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_ ... position/9
...Nene
Nene fares surprisingly well in this, coming in at 13 overall and 3rd for DRPM.
Something about our offense is breaking this metric. From looking at where our players come in for ORPM, you'd think we have one of the worst offenses in the league. But we actually have a pretty good offense that scores points against almost anyone and generates a ton of assists. All five of our regular starters can score and pass. And we can score in crunch time, when a lot of other higher ranked offenses can't. Well... isn't that the bottom line for offensive performance?
We show up well as a team defense across the board in DRPM. That might actually reflect reality. When Nene plays, we're one of the best and most physical defenses in the league this year. We have our lapses from time to time, especially when Nene is out. So does everyone.
But we're not such a good defense that 15-6 comes entirely from that. We're not Indy or Chicago from last season, on either end.
I'm kinda puzzled by the claim that the Wizards have a "pretty good offense..." etc. Their offense (so far) has been average -- 106.0 points per 100 possessions vs. a league average of 106.1. It's a bit below average if we account for quality of competition (league's 4th easiest schedule so far), but forget about that for now.
Generating assists doesn't mean a lot. There are good offenses that generate assists and good offenses that don't, and bad offenses that get lots of assists and bad offenses that don't. This year, the correlation between offensive efficiency and assists is moderate (about 0.46).
As I posted over in the game thread, the Wizards shoot the ball pretty well (10th in efg), but are pretty average in turnovers and offensive rebounding, and below average at getting fouled.
And, the Wizards starters really haven't been good offensively. The current starting group -- Wall-Beal-Pierce-Humphries-Gortat -- is scoring about 103 points per 100 possessions. Replace Humphries with Nenê and the ortg falls to 100 (albeit very small sample size). Replace Beal and Humprhies with Temple and Nenê and the ortg was 92.
The starters as a group have truly been getting the job done on defense. The bench on the other hand has been crappy on defense and pretty good on offense.
As for Nenê, I think he's benefiting from some coattail effects. So far this season, most of his minutes have been played with other starters. That GROUP has been good defensively, and that's been true with Humphries in his place. RPM is supposed to filter that out, but it's tough for adjusted plus/minus models with only a quarter of the season played.




























