ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XXV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#241 » by gtn130 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 4:11 am

Like most conservatives popper is constantly pretending he’s some staunch and principled independent when he can’t help but tell on himself with all of the right wing garbage he inadvertently dumps on the thread.

He’s literally up to his eyeballs in Fox News.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#242 » by gtn130 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 4:13 am

popper do you have any idea how strung out on right wing media you have to be to think that the state of California is a bad place to live?
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 402
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#243 » by popper » Thu Feb 21, 2019 4:38 am

gtn130 wrote:popper do you have any idea how strung out on right wing media you have to be to think that the state of California is a bad place to live?


It's not right wing media gtn. It's a CNBC report of a poll.

Fifty-three percent say they are considering fleeing, representing a jump over the 49 percent a year ago.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/12/growing-number-of-californians-considering-moving-from-state-survey.html
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#244 » by gtn130 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 4:44 am

yes dude it’s **** expensive as hell to live there because - get this - there are lots of jobs and wealthy people and great cities and great weather and top tier universities.

Like yeah sure SF is prohibitively expensive these days. It’s also the preeminent tech hub in the entire world. Get a clue man
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#245 » by gtn130 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 4:47 am

CNBC: Many are leaving the SF Bay area because of the sky high costs of living due to the immense concentration of wealth and limited housing supply

popper: “wow what a hellhole. i hear they’re also shoveling **** on their mobile apps!”
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 402
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#246 » by popper » Thu Feb 21, 2019 5:03 am

gtn130 wrote:CNBC: Many are leaving the SF Bay area because of the sky high costs of living due to the immense concentration of wealth and limited housing supply

popper: “wow what a hellhole. i hear they’re also shoveling **** on their mobile apps!”


yeah - I used to love CA when I lived there in the 80's. What is happening there now is not sustainable.


California Companies Flee Business-Hostile State In Droves
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/california-companies-leave-taxes/

Business Exodus From California Is More Troubling Than Sanctuary Policies

https://chiefexecutive.net/business-exodus-california-troubling-sanctuary-policies/

Two dozen companies commit to leaving California
https://www.kcra.com/article/two-dozen-companies-commit-to-leaving-california-1/6402348

Bay Area exodus: Here are the companies that have moved headquarters or opened offices out of California
https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2018/10/09/bay-area-exodus-headquarters-move.html
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#247 » by pancakes3 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:04 am

um, are any of those exodus studies tied to "open borders" ?
does open borders = automatic citizenship?
even buying into the anchor baby discussion, why assume that those fully assimilated brown people will automatically vote blue by default?

i'll come out and say that i'm pro-open borders but equating that stance as some sort of conspiracy to inject partisan voters really dumbs down the discussion into partisan mudslinging.

just as an example, what exactly is partisan or intrinsically R/D about legislating a temporary (1-3 year) work visas for government-sponsored infrastructure-building make-work programs? or seasonal agriculture workers? or removing the H1B cap for advanced degree holders? if voter demographic shifts are a concern, that can also be addressed by slowing the flow of green card holders to citizenship.
Bullets -> Wizards
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,932
And1: 9,312
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#248 » by queridiculo » Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:32 am

popper wrote:
It’s true that many R business executives and politicians want open borders as well for cheap labor. That doesn’t change my assertion that D leadership wants open borders to gain and sustain power. You’re real brave with the name calling, safe in your anonymity and hidden from any risk of a broken or shattered jaw.


Oh oh, internet tough guy alert, run and hide your children!
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,812
And1: 7,935
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#249 » by montestewart » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:21 pm

California used to be a good place to live. Then they let the Okies in.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 402
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#250 » by popper » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:34 pm

pancakes3 wrote:um, are any of those exodus studies tied to "open borders" ?
does open borders = automatic citizenship?
even buying into the anchor baby discussion, why assume that those fully assimilated brown people will automatically vote blue by default?

i'll come out and say that i'm pro-open borders but equating that stance as some sort of conspiracy to inject partisan voters really dumbs down the discussion into partisan mudslinging.

just as an example, what exactly is partisan or intrinsically R/D about legislating a temporary (1-3 year) work visas for government-sponsored infrastructure-building make-work programs? or seasonal agriculture workers? or removing the H1B cap for advanced degree holders? if voter demographic shifts are a concern, that can also be addressed by slowing the flow of green card holders to citizenship.


I appreciate the thoughtful response pancakes. I support temporary work visas and policies to attract those that can benefit our economy without pushing wages lower for Americans. We need a measured and steady influx of vetted and productive foreign workers without question. Unfortunately congress appears unable to develop such a plan.

Instead our current policies incentivize caravans of poor under-educated people to enter our country through ports of entry, and once in, claim asylum and neglect to return for their adjudication hearings. Others enter illegally, claim asylum if caught, or evade authorities altogether and disappear into the interior.

Regarding the partisan nature of the issue, I won’t rehash what I’ve already posted other than to say that Pelosi and Sanders have stated unequivocally that law abiding and undocumented emigrants should not be deported. I appreciate their honesty but if that’s going to be their policy then multitudes will seek to enter the country by any means possible. I don’t think that’s good for the country.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 402
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#251 » by popper » Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:05 pm

Gentlemen - I'm sorry if my opinions have offended any of you. I should never have allowed myself to reenter the gauntlet. I'm sure you'd rather converse with like-minded participants and be done with my stirring of the pot. I'll retreat now to my perch on the balcony overlooking the Atlantic Ocean to the left and the Intracoastal waterway to the right. Life is good, beautiful sunrise over the ocean and the dolphin pods have been active this morning. Thinking a Bloody Mary might be just what I need to start the day. Best to all of you.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,812
And1: 7,935
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#252 » by montestewart » Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:15 pm

Hey everybody, watch the name calling. If you disagree w/ Popper, give him some links to some alternative perspectives. Maybe he'll read them, and if not him, maybe someone else who needs them will.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,859
And1: 20,403
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#253 » by dckingsfan » Thu Feb 21, 2019 2:52 pm

gtn130 wrote:popper do you have any idea how strung out on right wing media you have to be to think that the state of California is a bad place to live?

Well, that all depends. Are we talking about Fresno :D

Years ago I moved out of the Sacramento area because the air quality was so bad in the central valley. And many of the schools in CA truly suck. I also lived in the valley when you couldn't see the mountains because the smog was so thick.

So, I think parts of CA are amazing if you have money. And parts suck. But CA is huge. So, saying it is great or saying its bad - well, it isn't either - its both.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,859
And1: 20,403
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#254 » by dckingsfan » Thu Feb 21, 2019 2:59 pm

User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#255 » by gtn130 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 5:08 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:popper do you have any idea how strung out on right wing media you have to be to think that the state of California is a bad place to live?

Well, that all depends. Are we talking about Fresno :D

Years ago I moved out of the Sacramento area because the air quality was so bad in the central valley. And many of the schools in CA truly suck. I also lived in the valley when you couldn't see the mountains because the smog was so thick.

So, I think parts of CA are amazing if you have money. And parts suck. But CA is huge. So, saying it is great or saying its bad - well, it isn't either - its both.


Yes, CA is a big place. On balance it's one of the best places to live in the entire world, and that isn't a controversial take. Popper was basically describing it as some type of slum.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,812
And1: 7,935
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#256 » by montestewart » Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:26 pm

gtn130 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:popper do you have any idea how strung out on right wing media you have to be to think that the state of California is a bad place to live?

Well, that all depends. Are we talking about Fresno :D

Years ago I moved out of the Sacramento area because the air quality was so bad in the central valley. And many of the schools in CA truly suck. I also lived in the valley when you couldn't see the mountains because the smog was so thick.

So, I think parts of CA are amazing if you have money. And parts suck. But CA is huge. So, saying it is great or saying its bad - well, it isn't either - its both.


Yes, CA is a big place. On balance it's one of the best places to live in the entire world, and that isn't a controversial take. Popper was basically describing it as some type of slum.

I have some very conservative relatives who live in California and have the money to relocate if they wanted to. They don't. Must be something about the place that attracts them.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,859
And1: 20,403
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#257 » by dckingsfan » Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:33 pm

gtn130 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:popper do you have any idea how strung out on right wing media you have to be to think that the state of California is a bad place to live?

Well, that all depends. Are we talking about Fresno :D

Years ago I moved out of the Sacramento area because the air quality was so bad in the central valley. And many of the schools in CA truly suck. I also lived in the valley when you couldn't see the mountains because the smog was so thick.

So, I think parts of CA are amazing if you have money. And parts suck. But CA is huge. So, saying it is great or saying its bad - well, it isn't either - its both.

Yes, CA is a big place. On balance it's one of the best places to live in the entire world, and that isn't a controversial take. Popper was basically describing it as some type of slum.

Gotcha… not sure I agree "on balance". I think it depends on your situation. If for example, you are raising kids without much money, I would argue not.

If you are single and making even a reasonable income and live in SD - damn right.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,348
And1: 11,541
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#258 » by Wizardspride » Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:07 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=19

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,551
And1: 4,496
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#259 » by closg00 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:31 pm

Karma, they thought they could break him, Nike and Colin are winning Biggly
Read on Twitter
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,551
And1: 4,496
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XXV 

Post#260 » by closg00 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:15 pm

Not so fast
Read on Twitter

Return to Washington Wizards