queridiculo wrote:Not sure if this latest ruling just narrowly overcoming the CONservative SCOTUS majority is something to cheer about or to dread given that it took Amy Barrett voting in favor of upholding the separation of power.“Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars? The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned,” wrote Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.
What a bunch of weirdos.
What exactly does "government" mean exactly according to them?
Apparently it does not include the legislative branch and it almost certainly doesn't appear as if they believe that it is their job to hold a leader with dictatorship ambitions to account.
Is it POTUS or KOTUS, and how do you square "constitutional originalism" with viewing this republic as a constitutional monarchy?
Pearl clutching level 11 and not even a phucking legal argument, this should have been a 9-0 ruling, we are doomed.
