ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XIII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#261 » by popper » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:39 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
popper wrote:Our political differences and values (conservative vs. progressive) are on opposite ends of the spectrum. This yawning divide prevents both ideologies an opportunity to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Just curious, would my progressive friends here support splitting the country in two or more nations based on ideology (assuming it was even possible)? I would in a heart beat. I respect those on my political left but I'd like my kids to be able to pursue a future consistent with their belief system and I assume progressives would want to do the same. Otherwise gridlock prevails. Maybe the angst in CA and their desire to secede might actually be an impetus to seriously look at separation.

I would think it most certainly lead to another civil war...


If it was desired by both parties and negotiated with mutual respect there would be no need for a civil war.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,504
And1: 2,787
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#262 » by Kanyewest » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:03 pm

gtn130 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Freedom! Democracy!


This is depressing.

From Fox News.
Read on Twitter
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,144
And1: 20,595
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#263 » by dckingsfan » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:06 pm

popper wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
popper wrote:Our political differences and values (conservative vs. progressive) are on opposite ends of the spectrum. This yawning divide prevents both ideologies an opportunity to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Just curious, would my progressive friends here support splitting the country in two or more nations based on ideology (assuming it was even possible)? I would in a heart beat. I respect those on my political left but I'd like my kids to be able to pursue a future consistent with their belief system and I assume progressives would want to do the same. Otherwise gridlock prevails. Maybe the angst in CA and their desire to secede might actually be an impetus to seriously look at separation.

I would think it most certainly lead to another civil war...

If it was desired by both parties and negotiated with mutual respect there would be no need for a civil war.

So, you are a liberal in a red state. Or you are a conservative in a blue state. There would be no respectful dialog for those.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#264 » by popper » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:10 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
popper wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I would think it most certainly lead to another civil war...

If it was desired by both parties and negotiated with mutual respect there would be no need for a civil war.

So, you are a liberal in a red state. Or you are a conservative in a blue state. There would be no respectful dialog for those.


Why? I've had respectful dialog with progressives here for seven years. Before that, for decades in my other interactions.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,160
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#265 » by DCZards » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:10 pm

popper wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
popper wrote:Our political differences and values (conservative vs. progressive) are on opposite ends of the spectrum. This yawning divide prevents both ideologies an opportunity to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Just curious, would my progressive friends here support splitting the country in two or more nations based on ideology (assuming it was even possible)? I would in a heart beat. I respect those on my political left but I'd like my kids to be able to pursue a future consistent with their belief system and I assume progressives would want to do the same. Otherwise gridlock prevails. Maybe the angst in CA and their desire to secede might actually be an impetus to seriously look at separation.

I would think it most certainly lead to another civil war...


If it was desired by both parties and negotiated with mutual respect there would be no need for a civil war.


I think this notion that the country is deeply divided between left and right is blown out of proportion. I believe most Americans are moderates or in the middle politically...depending upon the issue. Those people would find this idea to divide the country based on politics ridiculous, imo.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#266 » by popper » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:40 pm

DCZards wrote:
popper wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I would think it most certainly lead to another civil war...


If it was desired by both parties and negotiated with mutual respect there would be no need for a civil war.


I think this notion that the country is deeply divided between left and right is blown out of proportion. I believe most Americans are moderates or in the middle politically...depending upon the issue. Those people would find this idea to divide the country based on politics ridiculous, imo.


Well there are millions of CA progressives that are "ridiculous" then.


California Dreamin’? Many in Golden State Want to Secede From Trump’s U.S.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/california-dreamin-many-golden-state-want-secede-trump-s-u-n681796

California’s Secession Movement Gains Traction in Wake of Trump’s Election

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/444357/california-secession-movement-support-increases-state-resists-trump-administration
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,691
And1: 5,273
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#267 » by tontoz » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:14 pm

DCZards wrote:
I think this notion that the country is deeply divided between left and right is blown out of proportion. I believe most Americans are moderates or in the middle politically...depending upon the issue. Those people would find this idea to divide the country based on politics ridiculous, imo.


Agreed. I don't feel like either party represents me at all.

I can't help but feel like the two party system really doesn't work. Instead of working towards the best interests of the country it is all about beating the other side.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
bsilver
Rookie
Posts: 1,103
And1: 592
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Location: New Haven, CT

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#268 » by bsilver » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:15 pm

popper wrote:Our political differences and values (conservative vs. progressive) are on opposite ends of the spectrum. This yawning divide prevents both ideologies an opportunity to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Just curious, would my progressive friends here support splitting the country in two or more nations based on ideology (assuming it was even possible)? I would in a heart beat. I respect those on my political left but I'd like my kids to be able to pursue a future consistent with their belief system and I assume progressives would want to do the same. Otherwise gridlock prevails. Maybe the angst in CA and their desire to secede might actually be an impetus to seriously look at separation.

I think there is a false assumption in your question. If we divide politically there's not just two groups. There's at least three, and people in the middle would probably want their own country.

There's also a lot of people with little or no interest in politics. Their main desire may be to live in a warm place, or near the ocean, or in a city, or the country. Others want to be where's there's a job.

All that aside, today, anyone with strong political beliefs can choose to live with others of like minded beliefs. Last year we moved to New Haven, CT to be near family. We chose to live in the city which is very liberal and diverse. We could have lived 20 minutes away and been in almost all white conservative community. Others can also choose a place to live based on politics.
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics — quote popularized by Mark Twain.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#269 » by sfam » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:20 pm

Really great but long read:

Read on Twitter


The cover is amazing!
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#270 » by sfam » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:26 pm

tontoz wrote:That was our country at one time. So was slavery. So was the massacre of the Indians.

Certainly we have made a lot of progress since then but a lot of people were needlessly killed along the way. I am not seeing similar progress in Muslim countries. They have far less diversity and far more ethnic conflicts.

If they can't get along peacefully with each other I see no reason why I should expect them to assimilate peacefully here. I have no problem with more vetting in regards to Muslim immigration, although Trump's handling of the issue certainly leaves something to be desired.

He is a bit nuts himself with a laundry list of character flaws, but that doesn't mean he is wrong about everything.


You keep bypassing the essential point - Muslims have been here since before the Revolutionary War. They are already ingrained fabric of Americana.

We could say the same thing about all Latin Americans - its been "Big Men" rule there for generations. I see no reason that those Christians, who clearly can't get along peacefully with each other should assimilate peacefully here.

This is like blaming White Vans for the DC Sniper attacks. You're sort of blaming the wrong thing. Muslims are integrating fine in the US. The only problem with integration - Muslims or otherwise - is alienation. By overtly supporting policies to alienate and ostracize them, you actually create the violent extremists you are concerned of. This is what the research shows quite clearly.

And its strange - not too long ago Republicans talked of American exceptionalism. Trump regularly bashes the US. "We've made progress since then" is a really far fall from the shining city on the hill. We've made more than progress - our values and way of living have been a beacon for the world specifically because of our notions of meritocracy - meaning even a Muslim potentially could come here and become successful.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,679
And1: 4,550
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#271 » by closg00 » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:29 pm

gtn130 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Freedom! Democracy!


This is what Fascism looks like, straight-up. Mussolini, Hitler, Pinchot, and other Dictators enjoyed support amongst their population during their rule, Trump will be no exception, "the base" will love to this.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#272 » by popper » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:31 pm

bsilver wrote:
popper wrote:Our political differences and values (conservative vs. progressive) are on opposite ends of the spectrum. This yawning divide prevents both ideologies an opportunity to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Just curious, would my progressive friends here support splitting the country in two or more nations based on ideology (assuming it was even possible)? I would in a heart beat. I respect those on my political left but I'd like my kids to be able to pursue a future consistent with their belief system and I assume progressives would want to do the same. Otherwise gridlock prevails. Maybe the angst in CA and their desire to secede might actually be an impetus to seriously look at separation.

I think there is a false assumption in your question. If we divide politically there's not just two groups. There's at least three, and people in the middle would probably want their own country.

There's also a lot of people with little or no interest in politics. Their main desire may be to live in a warm place, or near the ocean, or in a city, or the country. Others want to be where's there's a job.

All that aside, today, anyone with strong political beliefs can choose to live with others of like minded beliefs. Last year we moved to New Haven, CT to be near family. We chose to live in the city which is very liberal and diverse. We could have lived 20 minutes away and been in almost all white conservative community. Others can also choose a place to live based on politics.


Yeah. I described the two poles and then noted a possible separation into "two or more nations".
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#273 » by sfam » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:37 pm

popper wrote:Our political differences and values (conservative vs. progressive) are on opposite ends of the spectrum. This yawning divide prevents both ideologies an opportunity to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Just curious, would my progressive friends here support splitting the country in two or more nations based on ideology (assuming it was even possible)? I would in a heart beat. I respect those on my political left but I'd like my kids to be able to pursue a future consistent with their belief system and I assume progressives would want to do the same. Otherwise gridlock prevails. Maybe the angst in CA and their desire to secede might actually be an impetus to seriously look at separation.

Muslim Americans and Christian Americans, Republicans and Democrats all:

- follow most traffic rules. This is not common almost anywhere.
- watch the Superbowl, including the ads.
- eat tacos
- stay in line in retail stores and shopping markets. This is not common almost anywhere
- take their kids to play soccer, sometime around 5 or 6, and worry about providing the right snacks
- largely believe in the rule of law
- want to feel safe in their homes at night
- want their kids to do better than they have
- believe America should be a beacon for the rest of the world
- hate politicians
- hate the news media
- hate spam phone calls
- want their kids to go to college and have wonderful lives
- want to have grandkids

In terms of your approach, what about Austin Texas? What about all the liberals living in Montana? We're Americans first. That which binds us as Americans - our culture - really is a shared entity. Something as simple as following traffic laws or lining up at a McDonalds are truly American, and shared by all who live here.

There really is a shared way of life that those who come here learn and adhere to. Just travel abroad widely and it hits you in the face. We're doing our level best to break this country apart, but its gonna take a while.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#274 » by sfam » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:40 pm

closg00 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Freedom! Democracy!


This is what Fascism looks like, straight-up. Mussolini, Hitler, Pinchot, and other Dictators enjoyed support amongst their population during their rule, Trump will be no exception, "the base" will love to this.

Well, if Jake Tapper ends up getting poisoned with Vx, I think you'll have a stronger argument.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,827
And1: 7,961
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#275 » by montestewart » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:42 pm

popper wrote:
bsilver wrote:
popper wrote:Our political differences and values (conservative vs. progressive) are on opposite ends of the spectrum. This yawning divide prevents both ideologies an opportunity to achieve their desired policy outcomes. Just curious, would my progressive friends here support splitting the country in two or more nations based on ideology (assuming it was even possible)? I would in a heart beat. I respect those on my political left but I'd like my kids to be able to pursue a future consistent with their belief system and I assume progressives would want to do the same. Otherwise gridlock prevails. Maybe the angst in CA and their desire to secede might actually be an impetus to seriously look at separation.

I think there is a false assumption in your question. If we divide politically there's not just two groups. There's at least three, and people in the middle would probably want their own country.

There's also a lot of people with little or no interest in politics. Their main desire may be to live in a warm place, or near the ocean, or in a city, or the country. Others want to be where's there's a job.

All that aside, today, anyone with strong political beliefs can choose to live with others of like minded beliefs. Last year we moved to New Haven, CT to be near family. We chose to live in the city which is very liberal and diverse. We could have lived 20 minutes away and been in almost all white conservative community. Others can also choose a place to live based on politics.


Yeah. I described the two poles and then noted a possible separation into "two or more nations".

Tricky and krii?
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,691
And1: 5,273
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#276 » by tontoz » Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:22 am

sfam wrote:
tontoz wrote:That was our country at one time. So was slavery. So was the massacre of the Indians.

Certainly we have made a lot of progress since then but a lot of people were needlessly killed along the way. I am not seeing similar progress in Muslim countries. They have far less diversity and far more ethnic conflicts.

If they can't get along peacefully with each other I see no reason why I should expect them to assimilate peacefully here. I have no problem with more vetting in regards to Muslim immigration, although Trump's handling of the issue certainly leaves something to be desired.

He is a bit nuts himself with a laundry list of character flaws, but that doesn't mean he is wrong about everything.


You keep bypassing the essential point - Muslims have been here since before the Revolutionary War. They are already ingrained fabric of Americana.

We could say the same thing about all Latin Americans - its been "Big Men" rule there for generations. I see no reason that those Christians, who clearly can't get along peacefully with each other should assimilate peacefully here.

This is like blaming White Vans for the DC Sniper attacks. You're sort of blaming the wrong thing. Muslims are integrating fine in the US. The only problem with integration - Muslims or otherwise - is alienation. By overtly supporting policies to alienate and ostracize them, you actually create the violent extremists you are concerned of. This is what the research shows quite clearly.

And its strange - not too long ago Republicans talked of American exceptionalism. Trump regularly bashes the US. "We've made progress since then" is a really far fall from the shining city on the hill. We've made more than progress - our values and way of living have been a beacon for the world specifically because of our notions of meritocracy - meaning even a Muslim potentially could come here and become successful.


Lol Muslims are 1 percent of the population. They are such a small minority that they can't start making demands.

But if we had truly open borders how long would it be before that changed? Judging by what I am seeing overseas it wouldn't take long, not to mention the murders they have committed here.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,451
And1: 11,652
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#277 » by Wizardspride » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:24 am

Yeah, don't think I like the road we're going down....



Read on Twitter



Read on Twitter

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,451
And1: 11,652
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#278 » by Wizardspride » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:33 am

gtn130 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Freedom! Democracy!



Read on Twitter

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,829
And1: 9,217
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#279 » by payitforward » Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:54 am

sfam wrote:
tontoz wrote:
sfam wrote:Actually I've decided to start here in the US with people like you. Diversity and multiculturalism is a good thing. Our nation is a country of immigrants. This is our strength.



So if it is a good thing then why are those countries fighting all the time? I guess it is only a good thing when it is convenient for you.

Were down to nonsense statements here. Really not sure what you intended with this, but, um, OK.

Dang! You put a bonehead on Ignore, but you still see his posts when someone quotes them. Hey... I guess the world isn't perfect, is it?

As far as what he "intended," that's easy. He didn't "intend" anything at all. Just an empty-headed blow-hard: the sound you hear is the wind whistling between his ears.

Oh wait a minute... I'm on a break from this thread! See you'all in some days. Actually, maybe not for a couple of weeks, as I'm off to Europe for a while. They got some a&&holes there too, btw! Fight the good fight, sfam. Or, even better, don't waste your time!
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII 

Post#280 » by sfam » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:20 am

Apparently my delusion is spreading

Read on Twitter


Who could've guessed that Trump was creating a policy without an actual intelligence basis? I'm Shocked! Shocked! to find out the intelligence community thinks this is a horrible idea!

What is not so shocking is that the Trump administration has tried to axe the actual intelligence assessment.

"I already told you the answer! Now give me intelligence to meet the fake facts!" Delusional indeed.

Someone certainly is delusional here, but it appears the intelligence community is slowly getting them aware of reality, leak by leak....

EDIT: Actual document here

Return to Washington Wizards