Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:My biggest reasons for liking Seraphin come down to doclinkin and Draft Express. doc loves him and doc tends to be right a whole lot of the time. DX had him there number one international.
Whereas my rose-colored glasses come in part from the names of the teams who were rumored to be pursuing trades to land him: Portland, OKC, Houston if I recall correctly. I'd trust their scouts far better than my own necessarily thin-sliced snap judgment.
I've seen little of the kid. I like what I see, and like that he improved late season sufficient to earn the starter role for a few games for the eventual French League champions (and would have taken the role more even into the playoffs if he hadn't tweaked his knee). I like that he has the build to add real strength to his raw power, and I like that his footwork is more highly developed than his jumper. He's young, has room to improve, is new enough to the game that he has no entrenched bad habits, and has the right emphasis to help the team where we need it most: defense and rebounding first.
I'm willing to wait on the rest, but I think he has the raw tools for John Wall to make him look mighty good. And my read is that he'll prove a good foil to play off of and with our finesse Bigs. I'm not impatient for him to develop at all. But defensively he's got the tools that JaVale lacks right now: a strong foundation and a willingness to take a bruise.
As for the C vs PF debate. I like him to find minutes regardless whatever you call him since our starting PF is six-foot-twelve and long armed. The team can afford to stick an undertall guy with a wide wingspan out there so long as he can hold his ground in the paint. Same way San Antonio can afford to call Timmy a PF and play him next to Oberto. If our PF were Jamison I wouldn't like the line-up quite as much. I just see where he plugs into the playbook, setting baseline screens and finishing the dump-off buckets at close range.

















