no D in Hibachi wrote:If the Wiz pick up Marshon Brooks I see little sense in bringing back Young unless it's for <4M per.
you do it so you get future value for him instead of nothing.
Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico
no D in Hibachi wrote:If the Wiz pick up Marshon Brooks I see little sense in bringing back Young unless it's for <4M per.
Ruzious wrote:Rafael122 wrote:OK, I have time now. Uhm, I would do it. It's one thing if it was McGee plus the 6th for the #2. It's another if it was a straight up swap.
At #2, we get Williams obviously. At #6, we go with Kanter or Biyombo, and at #18, we could go any which way, maybe one of the Morris Twins, maybe Klay Thompson who knows. The team will be extremely young, probably the youngest in the league but we'd get rid of the knuckleheads for sure, and maybe Flip won't have as much gray hair.
Then you factor in a hard cap. Can we afford to re-sign McGee?
Plus, if we don't re-sing McGee, we'd have more cap room next year to add a major free agent.
pineappleheadindc wrote:Guys, I've gotten a suggestion via PM that we do a draft contest. Essentially, it would go like this:
1. You name the draftee selected at our spots.
2. Points given for each answer that's correct. I'm thinking that because the variance of possible selections is greater the later you go, you get (as an example) 5 points for being correct at #6, 10 points for being correct on #18, and #15 points for being correct on #34.
ALTERNATIVE IS
1. You name your entire first round draft.
2. The points system is already set up logically. The higher you go, the easier it is. So you get #1 correct, 1 point. You get #2 correct, 2 points, etc.
Winner gets complete bragging rights for an entire year.
Any thoughts or interest in this?
Hofstra's Charles Jenkins is the sleeper of this draft. The 6-3 senior is regarded as one of the country's best mid-major talents, and was the CAA's Player of the Year for two straight seasons, but few were aware of just how dominant of a scorer he really was. On numbers alone, he's more impressive than any other scoring guard who's in contention for the first round, because he offers the rare combination of high efficiency in both ISO and spot-up situations.
hands11 wrote:Ruzious wrote:princeofpalace wrote:Tristan Thompson, would a good comparison be a slightly less athletic Josh Smith?
I think a bigger and smarter Tyrus Thomas is a better comparison
He measured in at all of one quarter inch taller and 10 lbs heavier in the DX measurements database - and Thomas is/was the better athlete of the 2.
JonathanJoseph wrote:
I would agree with this and go so far as to include Blatche in the untouchable group.
The reality is this is draft time, and history shows that many of these players won't pan out and are being way overvalued right now. A year from now, I think a Javale McGee for Derrick Williams trade would be considered laughable, much less McGee plus a high 1st round pick.
I'm actually quite high on Derrick Williams and think he'll be a pretty good NBA player, but I'm not sure he's a multiple time all-star which is what he'd have to be to justify the trades being thrown around here. I'm s till pretty surprised that Derrick Williams isn't being selected ahead of Irving.

closg00 wrote:pineappleheadindc wrote:Guys, I've gotten a suggestion via PM that we do a draft contest. Essentially, it would go like this:
1. You name the draftee selected at our spots.
2. Points given for each answer that's correct. I'm thinking that because the variance of possible selections is greater the later you go, you get (as an example) 5 points for being correct at #6, 10 points for being correct on #18, and #15 points for being correct on #34.
ALTERNATIVE IS
1. You name your entire first round draft.
2. The points system is already set up logically. The higher you go, the easier it is. So you get #1 correct, 1 point. You get #2 correct, 2 points, etc.
Winner gets complete bragging rights for an entire year.
Any thoughts or interest in this?
Sounds like fun Pine, breakout a thread and people will participate.

tontoz wrote:So a team that won 23 games has 3 untouchable players?
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
WizarDynasty wrote:McGee and Wall are untouchable. I would probably put blatche into that category as well. Wizards have plenty of assets to move up four spots in the draft. i will give a top 6 lotto protection pick next year before i would consider adding McGee.
McGee and Wall are the wizard's identity. you don't mess with that. Both are two way players at the hardest positions to fill. D.Williams is a scorer and the wizards have historically been a poor perimeter defensive team.
I like Derrick Williams but McGee and Wall are untouchable. Dominant offensive perimeter players with below average defensive skills are alot easier to find in free agency than two way bigs who have the ability to dominate offensively and defensively.
Ruzious wrote:closg00 wrote:pineappleheadindc wrote:Guys, I've gotten a suggestion via PM that we do a draft contest. Essentially, it would go like this:
1. You name the draftee selected at our spots.
2. Points given for each answer that's correct. I'm thinking that because the variance of possible selections is greater the later you go, you get (as an example) 5 points for being correct at #6, 10 points for being correct on #18, and #15 points for being correct on #34.
ALTERNATIVE IS
1. You name your entire first round draft.
2. The points system is already set up logically. The higher you go, the easier it is. So you get #1 correct, 1 point. You get #2 correct, 2 points, etc.
Winner gets complete bragging rights for an entire year.
Any thoughts or interest in this?
Sounds like fun Pine, breakout a thread and people will participate.
Sounds good to me. I like the Alternative - and maybe you could give extra points for the Wiz picks.
sfam wrote:WizarDynasty wrote:McGee and Wall are untouchable. I would probably put blatche into that category as well. Wizards have plenty of assets to move up four spots in the draft. i will give a top 6 lotto protection pick next year before i would consider adding McGee.
McGee and Wall are the wizard's identity. you don't mess with that. Both are two way players at the hardest positions to fill. D.Williams is a scorer and the wizards have historically been a poor perimeter defensive team.
I like Derrick Williams but McGee and Wall are untouchable. Dominant offensive perimeter players with below average defensive skills are alot easier to find in free agency than two way bigs who have the ability to dominate offensively and defensively.
I would put Blatche in the "Ultra-shippable" category. Sort of like the opposite of untouchable. And really, there's only one untouchable player on the Wizards. Anyone saying different is just hoping.
Edit: Btw, of than Dennis Rodman , I'm having a hard time coming up with a key player on a championship team who was also a teenage drama queen. Blatche is not up to Rodman's talent level.
Wizardspride wrote:Blatche smokes Rodman in terms of talent.
I think you would have been better off saying that "Blatche hasn't demonstrated Rodman's work ethic so far".
tontoz wrote:So a team that won 23 games has 3 untouchable players?

tontoz wrote:So a team that won 23 games has 3 untouchable players?
jholmbe1 wrote:tontoz wrote:So a team that won 23 games has 3 untouchable players?
Exactly. You're telling me the fat guy with a terrible work ethic who is sponsoring lap dances in South Beach is untouchable? Maybe only to other teams, I'm sure the Wiz would love to move him.