theboomking wrote:payitforward wrote:I could easily see a trade down for Olynyk working out. I agree w/ you that he can be a 10+ year good NBA player. As to Caldwell-Pope, he's moving up the DR mock; he has a shot to be the best rookie SG this year!
I like Porter, but I'd be very satisfied if the #3 pick got us picks that turned into Caldwell-Pope and Olynyk.
Wolters and some of the other guys you mention are also outstanding prospects.
If we had a GM who knew how to pick, we could turn our #3 pick into a terrific bunch of talent. If we had a GM who understood how talent-starved we are, he might try to do that. But we have a GM who thinks he is way astute if he puts together an average team (at a higher-than-average salary cost, btw). So that's not likely to happen.
Hence I'm stuck and just hope we pick Otto Porter; I feel pretty optimistic that he'll be a significantly better than average 3 in the league. Then of course we'll waste our #38 and throw away our #54 in the usual Ernie manner.
How many times in the NBA has a GM turned a top 5 pick into a terrific bunch of talent by trading down in the draft? This isn't the NFL and that strategy normally doesn't work. In almost any scenario, the team that wins the trade is the team that gets the single best player. If you guys ran the Rockets, you would have probably traded the Harden and Westbrook picks. And, I don't think there is any way that Caldwell Pope is going to be the best rookie shooting guard, nevermind have the best career.
CCJ, I like Olynyk too, but it makes zero sense to trade down for him. Olynyk is going to be picked in a range where picks can be bought and traded for at very little expense. I would much rather trade UP for Olynyk and keep and use the 3rd pick.
I watched that draft express video on Steven Adams and it wasn't too impressive. There were a lot of clips in there of him getting blocked by smaller, "less athletic" players. He looks less coordinated with a basketball than my very uncoordinated son. Maybe he could be groomed to be a good goon, but I think it is going to take a while. He measures like a top 12 pick and Drummond probably helps him. Drummond was on an entirely different level however on the defensive end of the floor. I wonder if a comp for Adams could be a very poor man's Derrick Favors.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmdpZD61dUw
Also, in the extended video of Porter's workout, I was impressed by his shooting. His form isn't beautiful, but his shot looks effortless and he seemed to make more of them than I remember Beal making in his workout highlights. I think Porter's shot is going to translate. I would be a little more comfortable with that prediction however if his FT% was a little higher.
I completely agree. Two axioms of the NBA, always trade coins for paper and team that gets the best player wins the trade. I agree about KCP too. And Olynyk. And Adams. Adams is bigger than Favors. Not as skilled or productive as Favors was at GT though. Production was a concern for Favors too.
I would go for quality over quantity in almost any acquisition, but particularly now, when we've got the Wall/Beal foundation in place. I think we're best off staying put in the top five and picking one of the most likely impact guys. Bennett or Porter probably. Though I would like to see us move up to get a defensive big. Those guys are expensive role players after their rookie deals are over.

















