dckingsfan wrote:prime1time wrote:payitforward wrote:Of course we'd trade with Philly. & how anyone can think the Sixers don't have the assets to acquire Beal... that beats me! Perhaps they don't want to trade those assets -- but they certainly have them.
We'd trade w/ them or any team, if we thought the trade made us better. Ditto in the other direction. Duh.
I know you don't like "pupu platters," but could we at least send Ernie Grunfeld along with Beal?
What are these assets you refer to? Outside of Embiid, Simmons and Fultz, what is the deal that the 76ers could realistically put together to get Beal? Also assuming they can get Beal without going up any of those 3, please explain to me how the Wizards would be competing with them now that they have Fultz, Beal, Embiid and Simmons? Trades are not just about making your team better. There are also about not helping your key opponents.
But enough of the abstract. What is a realistic deal that the 76ers could put together? Saric, Covington and a 1st round pick? Saric and a 1st rounder? Covington and a first rounder? Philly's picks with Beal in addition to Embiid, Fultz and Simmons will be so low that they lose value. But I'm all ears if you want to try out actual trade scenarios.
The more you put it that way, the more I think Grunfeld will pull the trigger.
Lol. People on this board are always so puzzled as to how Grunfeld stays around. It's because he's tied to the core of Beal, Wall and Porter. As long as that remains viable he'll be around. Barring a trade for a top 5 or top 10 player, Beal, Porter and Wall aren't going anywhere.






























