Wisedude42 wrote:Some folks have been saying they have a problem with Jamison being an undersized PF. This is ludicrous. Jamison, Butler and Arenas are the 3 main reasons the Wiz are a playoff team. Without Jamison, the Wiz are not a playoff team and have no chance going further. Arenas would not sign wothout Jamison - what does that tell you? Not to draft Arthur b/c he is too much like Jamison? If every GM in the league would know with a crystal ball that Arthur would be the same productive player as Jamison, he would have been a top 5 pick.
You can have all the 7'0" journeyman B. Haywood's you want. I'll take the All-Star player any day. Noone knows how McGee will turn out except all know is totally raw in every basketball aspect.
Also the pick was made b/c Grunfeld and Jordan are totally desparate for a center. Only time will tell how it all turns out.
gotta pick on this for a number of reasons
the issue with Jamison has always been that he's a bit of a tweener. No
one minds the outstanding production he gives us on the boards and getting
buckets. But realistically, he can be physically overmatched as a PF. So it's
not unreasonable to wish for a more athletically studly player. Duh that if
the GMs had a crystal ball that said Arthur =/~ Jamison, he'd be a top 5 or better.
B Haywood in point of fact, is not a journeyman. He's played for exactly ONE NBA
team. Perhaps you meant role-player which would be more accurate. RE the reasons
which might have led EG to pick McGee, maybe he simply thought he had the most
upside of the players on the board. I seriously doubt it was because he was
"desperate" for a C. Haywood is more than adequate especially when considering
his contract. It's possible that EG was looking down the road for when BH might
leave the team and hoping McGee might be ready by then. But thinking a year or
2 ahead is not usually described as being desperate. Foresighted perhaps.