ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
Shoe
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,372
And1: 956
Joined: Nov 06, 2017
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#361 » by Shoe » Wed Nov 6, 2019 10:20 pm

nate33 wrote:
Shoe wrote:Oops my bad Mojo. I was envisioning a scenario in which we pull off a trade for a star wing to play with Wall, Beal, Rui, Bryant and somehow win a title akin to the Raptors. In reality it'd be Foye / Miller 2.0

Not many teams with a star in his prime who is willing to trade him. One plausible name that comes to mind is Myles Turner if Indy has a disappointing year. But even that is questionable. I don't think Indy wants to wait 2 years to develop a young pick when Oladipo only has so many prime years left.

Maybe Orlando would trade a guy like Aaron Gordon?

Those are the only two guys I can think of at the moment.


#1 pick for one year of Giannis? He'd have to ask out, but even then it'd probably take more than that. If it was this past draft class I would absolutely trade Zion for one year of Wall/Beal/Giannis/Rui/TB, but there is no super hyped prospect like Zion in this draft unfortunately. Also the money can't work I'm assuming.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,223
And1: 22,627
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#362 » by nate33 » Wed Nov 6, 2019 10:25 pm

Shoe wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Shoe wrote:Oops my bad Mojo. I was envisioning a scenario in which we pull off a trade for a star wing to play with Wall, Beal, Rui, Bryant and somehow win a title akin to the Raptors. In reality it'd be Foye / Miller 2.0

Not many teams with a star in his prime who is willing to trade him. One plausible name that comes to mind is Myles Turner if Indy has a disappointing year. But even that is questionable. I don't think Indy wants to wait 2 years to develop a young pick when Oladipo only has so many prime years left.

Maybe Orlando would trade a guy like Aaron Gordon?

Those are the only two guys I can think of at the moment.


#1 pick for one year of Giannis? He'd have to ask out, but even then it'd probably take more than that. If it was this past draft class I would absolutely trade Zion for one year of Wall/Beal/Giannis/Rui/TB, but there is no super hyped prospect like Zion in this draft unfortunately. Also the money can't work I'm assuming.


I don't see the Giannis thing panning out. Even if Giannis states that he'll move on in 2021, Milwaukee is going to spend the next two seasons doing whatever it takes to try and win it while they still have Giannis.

The only way we land Giannis is if we dump Wall, get our cap clear in 2021, and try and sign him ourselves. And in that scenario, we'd have to beat out teams like Milwaukee and Miami who are looking to do the same thing.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,216
And1: 2,779
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#363 » by pcbothwel » Wed Nov 6, 2019 10:38 pm

Ruzious wrote:The Bucks will be an Ilyasova injury away from panicking and trading the Pacers 1st rounder (18th now) for Bertans and the 2nd rounder the Wiz own. We could then still sign Bertans in the offseason.


I've looked at the Bucks as well, but as you said, Ilyasova and Bertans is redundant. Yes, he could get injured, but we could assume that with a ton of teams too.
User avatar
Mojo Amok
Pro Prospect
Posts: 960
And1: 834
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#364 » by Mojo Amok » Wed Nov 6, 2019 10:38 pm

The cap ballast issue is something we should be very careful with. If we do the most predictable moves possible - i.e. sign maybe three draft picks, two of which are cheap and then use the MLE - we'll be just over the cap. That's about $30+ million under the tax line, which is a large potential resource that we can't use in any meaningful way. It will also be almost impossible for us to engage with most of what all is out there on the trade market too.

I'm inclined to think that we should either retain Bertans or trade Mahinmi and maybe Miles for bad 2021 salary with incentives attached. The thing is, there might not be much available with the second option (Hardaway Jr. comes to mind as bad money, but that's probably too big and Dallas has draft pick commitments out to the Knicks).

I'm not sure what the best course is, but I'm not liking the idea of letting everyone expire - it's just an awkward spot to be in. Signing Bertans for an insane one year deal would probably be better than doing nothing.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#365 » by Ruzious » Wed Nov 6, 2019 10:40 pm

nate33 wrote:
Shoe wrote:
nate33 wrote:Not many teams with a star in his prime who is willing to trade him. One plausible name that comes to mind is Myles Turner if Indy has a disappointing year. But even that is questionable. I don't think Indy wants to wait 2 years to develop a young pick when Oladipo only has so many prime years left.

Maybe Orlando would trade a guy like Aaron Gordon?

Those are the only two guys I can think of at the moment.


#1 pick for one year of Giannis? He'd have to ask out, but even then it'd probably take more than that. If it was this past draft class I would absolutely trade Zion for one year of Wall/Beal/Giannis/Rui/TB, but there is no super hyped prospect like Zion in this draft unfortunately. Also the money can't work I'm assuming.


I don't see the Giannis thing panning out. Even if Giannis states that he'll move on in 2021, Milwaukee is going to spend the next two seasons doing whatever it takes to try and win it while they still have Giannis.

The only way we land Giannis is if we dump Wall, get our cap clear in 2021, and try and sign him ourselves. And in that scenario, we'd have to beat out teams like Milwaukee and Miami who are looking to do the same thing.

Yeah, getting Giannis is fantasy-land. Even though Milwaukee probably blew it by not finding a way to keep Brogdon, they are in the driver's seat to keep Giannis. And if he decided to change teams, he'd have to really believe the team he'd go to was ready to win an NBA championship right away. Mil's still got a good blend of talent around him with lots of depth.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#366 » by Ruzious » Wed Nov 6, 2019 10:44 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
Ruzious wrote:The Bucks will be an Ilyasova injury away from panicking and trading the Pacers 1st rounder (18th now) for Bertans and the 2nd rounder the Wiz own. We could then still sign Bertans in the offseason.


I've looked at the Bucks as well, but as you said, Ilyasova and Bertans is redundant. Yes, he could get injured, but we could assume that with a ton of teams too.

I agree, but then again Mirotic was pretty redundant last year as well, and the Bucks still paid to rent him.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,223
And1: 22,627
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#367 » by nate33 » Wed Nov 6, 2019 11:47 pm

Mojo Amok wrote: Signing Bertans for an insane one year deal would probably be better than doing nothing.

Or a front loaded contract with an 8% decline in salary for each successive year.
User avatar
Mojo Amok
Pro Prospect
Posts: 960
And1: 834
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#368 » by Mojo Amok » Thu Nov 7, 2019 12:02 am

nate33 wrote:
Mojo Amok wrote: Signing Bertans for an insane one year deal would probably be better than doing nothing.

Or a front loaded contract with an 8% decline in salary for each successive year.


Yeah, I would prefer something like that too. I was throwing out the hypothetical of "even something tactically suboptimal like a crazy one year deal" would be better than just letting everyone expire.

A declining deal would be great, but the main thing is I think a lot of the ideas of trading Bertans away would only make any sense if we also bring in some 2021 money of some sort or another (perhaps in a trade for Bertans or perhaps from Miles/ Mahinmi). My preference would just be to keep Davis, though.

Otherwise, we might be looking at resigning Mahinmi in a move mirroring that Keith Van Horn late-career free-money contract.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,223
And1: 22,627
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#369 » by nate33 » Thu Nov 7, 2019 12:04 am

Mojo Amok wrote:I'm inclined to think that we should either retain Bertans or trade Mahinmi and maybe Miles for bad 2021 salary with incentives attached. The thing is, there might not be much available with the second option (Hardaway Jr. comes to mind as bad money, but that's probably too big and Dallas has draft pick commitments out to the Knicks).


The real problem is that I don't think there are many teams desperate to clear cap space in 2020 because there are no good free agents. Portland, Miami and Golden State are facing steep luxtax bills this year and would want to shed money, I suppose. But Portland has deep pockets and presumably isn't worried about he luxtax; Miami doesn't have any picks to trade; and Golden State doesn't want to trade any of their big contracts.

Our best bet might be to wait around and maybe be part of some 3-way deal where we can step in and absorb some salary. But frankly, our $5M TPE is probably a much more useful asset in that scenario than either Mahinmi's or Miles' contracts
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,223
And1: 22,627
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#370 » by nate33 » Thu Nov 7, 2019 12:06 am

Mojo Amok wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Mojo Amok wrote: Signing Bertans for an insane one year deal would probably be better than doing nothing.

Or a front loaded contract with an 8% decline in salary for each successive year.


Yeah, I would prefer something like that too. I was throwing out the hypothetical of "even something tactically suboptimal like a crazy one year deal" would be better than just letting everyone expire.

A declining deal would be great, but the main thing is I think a lot of the ideas of trading Bertans away would only make any sense if we also bring in some 2021 money of some sort or another (perhaps in a trade for Bertans or perhaps from Miles/ Mahinmi). My preference would just be to keep Davis, though.

Otherwise, we might be looking at resigning Mahinmi in a move mirroring that Keith Van Horn late-career free-money contract.


It's not all that bad. We have a project payroll next year of $100M. Add a lotto pick and it's $105M or so. Bertans at $13M a year gets us to $118M. An MLE free agent gets us to $128M. If the luxtax is in the $135-140 range, we're not missing out on all that much opportunity.
User avatar
Mojo Amok
Pro Prospect
Posts: 960
And1: 834
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#371 » by Mojo Amok » Thu Nov 7, 2019 12:09 am

nate33 wrote:
Mojo Amok wrote:
nate33 wrote:Or a front loaded contract with an 8% decline in salary for each successive year.


Yeah, I would prefer something like that too. I was throwing out the hypothetical of "even something tactically suboptimal like a crazy one year deal" would be better than just letting everyone expire.

A declining deal would be great, but the main thing is I think a lot of the ideas of trading Bertans away would only make any sense if we also bring in some 2021 money of some sort or another (perhaps in a trade for Bertans or perhaps from Miles/ Mahinmi). My preference would just be to keep Davis, though.

Otherwise, we might be looking at resigning Mahinmi in a move mirroring that Keith Van Horn late-career free-money contract.


It's not all that bad. We have a project payroll next year of $100M. Add a lotto pick and it's $105M or so. Bertans at $13M a year gets us to $118M. An MLE free agent gets us to $128M. If the luxtax is in the $135-140 range, we're not missing out on all that much opportunity.


I would be happy with that scenario - I just don't want to see us bring in $115 million in salary into next year. That's the opposite of the sweet spot. If we get up to $128 on either a good player like Bertans or cap ballast, I'll be fine with it.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,689
And1: 9,141
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#372 » by payitforward » Thu Nov 7, 2019 3:22 am

The Washington Wizards are a REBUILDING team. A BAD team. Why ever would we trade away our R1 pick? Why should we sign anyone for 1 year? We should we imagine a superstar is going to come here & take us to fantasyland.

Perhaps, as well, it's worth being reminded that we have NEVER been a particularly good team -- where by "never" I mean in the lifetime of probably 3/4 of those who post here, the Washington Bullets/Wizards have never been a particularly good team.

Nor have we been good in the John Wall-Bradley Beal era. Far from it. Paul Pierce & the late Rasual Butler (1-year rent-a-players, both of them) shot us out of the gate 19-6 in 2014-15. Since then, we've played 400 regular season games: our record is 194-206. &, yes, that does include our 49-win season.

In short, the idea that we are only a couple of players away from contending (for anything...) is a ridiculous fantasy. We have exactly 3 players, that's all, about whom we can say both that they are good players (at any level of good) & that they will be with us after this year: Brad, Troy Brown, Thomas Bryant.

That's it; there are no more. The young players are all question marks, every one of them -- including Rui. The veterans are expiring and/or of little or no use: any trade of any of them for any kind of draft pick at all would be a good trade.

So, please, lets not talk about Giannis, ok?
thinker07
Junior
Posts: 360
And1: 75
Joined: Jul 08, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#373 » by thinker07 » Thu Nov 7, 2019 6:30 am

Having watched most of Portland's games this year, I think they are standing on the ledge peering into the abyss.
Collins is out at least 4 months, Nurkic is out maybe until after the allstar break, Whiteside and Hood both picked up frustration/shoving players technicals in their last game, their offense is almost non-existent other than a lot of Lillard and CJ dribble and jack plays, their options for a starting PF are Andrew Tolliver and Mario Hezonja or going small with Hood (none of whom are very good defensive players). Look who the PF's are in the Western Conference. Who on Portland is going to defend against them?

Brian Windhorst said today that Portland is going to have to make a significant trade and almost certainly well before the trade deadline because they risk falling too far behind thinking that they could try and wait to see when Nurkic returns. If you look at the contracts they have that they'd consider trading it pretty much comes down to Whiteside $27 m, Bazemore $19 m, and Collins $4.5 m. Then they have their draft picks and Nassir Little and Simons.

Windhorst said the deal that makes the most sense is Bazemore + something good (picks, Nassir Little etc) for Danilo Gallinari - $22 m. I'm sure Portland likes Little but he is a ways off from being able to see the court with Portland - probably a couple of years. Portland doesn't even have a GLeague team to develop him more consistently. I don't think Portland will be able to hold on to him if their season continues to collapse.

And the ownership of Portland isn't exactly stable. The team is actually owned by Paul Allen's charitable foundation and run by his sister who has no experience in sports. It's somewhat likely that the foundation owning the team violates irs charity regulations. The whole team structure REALLY needs to win this year. So Little, who might be good 2 or 3 years from now is expendable. So are their picks, so is Collins. Is Sam Presti going to be anxious to help out their division mates? Or will he try to gouge them like he tries with every trade? I doubt that he gives Portland Gallinari in return for a 2nd round pick. And not that many teams are ready to trade players this early into the season?

So if Portland is forced to make a trade soon, it seems not out of the question to go back to Nate's original idea of doing something along the lines of Whiteside + Little and/or picks for some combination of Mahinmi, Bertans, CJ Miles. They could also do something around Collins + in return for Bertans. It's a lot to pay for a rental, but Portland might have to choke it down.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,689
And1: 9,141
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#374 » by payitforward » Thu Nov 7, 2019 3:51 pm

thinker07 wrote:Having watched most of Portland's games this year, I think they are standing on the ledge peering into the abyss.
...if Portland is forced to make a trade soon, it seems not out of the question to go back to Nate's original idea of doing something along the lines of Whiteside + Little and/or picks for some combination of Mahinmi, Bertans, CJ Miles. They could also do something around Collins + in return for Bertans. It's a lot to pay for a rental, but Portland might have to choke it down.

??
Whiteside is playing well. This trade likely makes them worse this season & robs from their future. Why would they go for that?
prime1time
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,964
And1: 2,204
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#375 » by prime1time » Thu Nov 7, 2019 5:08 pm

I'm firmly in the camp of playing out the season, keeping our first round pick and continuing the rebuild. Way too early to consider going all in on a Giannis esque trade. Also, any team that trades for Giannis will gut their roster ala the Lakers for Davis or the Clippers for PG. Our best bet is to continue the rebuild and hope to woo free agents with better play ala the Nets. A top 5 pick in this draft could be very impactful.
Roy The Natural
RealGM
Posts: 10,302
And1: 5,450
Joined: Nov 07, 2014

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#376 » by Roy The Natural » Thu Nov 7, 2019 5:12 pm

nate33 wrote:
Mojo Amok wrote:I'm inclined to think that we should either retain Bertans or trade Mahinmi and maybe Miles for bad 2021 salary with incentives attached. The thing is, there might not be much available with the second option (Hardaway Jr. comes to mind as bad money, but that's probably too big and Dallas has draft pick commitments out to the Knicks).


The real problem is that I don't think there are many teams desperate to clear cap space in 2020 because there are no good free agents. Portland, Miami and Golden State are facing steep luxtax bills this year and would want to shed money, I suppose. But Portland has deep pockets and presumably isn't worried about he luxtax; Miami doesn't have any picks to trade; and Golden State doesn't want to trade any of their big contracts.

Our best bet might be to wait around and maybe be part of some 3-way deal where we can step in and absorb some salary. But frankly, our $5M TPE is probably a much more useful asset in that scenario than either Mahinmi's or Miles' contracts


FYI. Portland has around $40 million in expiring contracts. They should have $18-20 million in cap space this off-season. They don't need to clear salary.
Roy The Natural
RealGM
Posts: 10,302
And1: 5,450
Joined: Nov 07, 2014

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#377 » by Roy The Natural » Thu Nov 7, 2019 5:22 pm

thinker07 wrote:Having watched most of Portland's games this year, I think they are standing on the ledge peering into the abyss.
Collins is out at least 4 months, Nurkic is out maybe until after the allstar break, Whiteside and Hood both picked up frustration/shoving players technicals in their last game, their offense is almost non-existent other than a lot of Lillard and CJ dribble and jack plays, their options for a starting PF are Andrew Tolliver and Mario Hezonja or going small with Hood (none of whom are very good defensive players). Look who the PF's are in the Western Conference. Who on Portland is going to defend against them?

Brian Windhorst said today that Portland is going to have to make a significant trade and almost certainly well before the trade deadline because they risk falling too far behind thinking that they could try and wait to see when Nurkic returns. If you look at the contracts they have that they'd consider trading it pretty much comes down to Whiteside $27 m, Bazemore $19 m, and Collins $4.5 m. Then they have their draft picks and Nassir Little and Simons.

Windhorst said the deal that makes the most sense is Bazemore + something good (picks, Nassir Little etc) for Danilo Gallinari - $22 m. I'm sure Portland likes Little but he is a ways off from being able to see the court with Portland - probably a couple of years. Portland doesn't even have a GLeague team to develop him more consistently. I don't think Portland will be able to hold on to him if their season continues to collapse.

And the ownership of Portland isn't exactly stable. The team is actually owned by Paul Allen's charitable foundation and run by his sister who has no experience in sports. It's somewhat likely that the foundation owning the team violates irs charity regulations. The whole team structure REALLY needs to win this year. So Little, who might be good 2 or 3 years from now is expendable. So are their picks, so is Collins. Is Sam Presti going to be anxious to help out their division mates? Or will he try to gouge them like he tries with every trade? I doubt that he gives Portland Gallinari in return for a 2nd round pick. And not that many teams are ready to trade players this early into the season?

So if Portland is forced to make a trade soon, it seems not out of the question to go back to Nate's original idea of doing something along the lines of Whiteside + Little and/or picks for some combination of Mahinmi, Bertans, CJ Miles. They could also do something around Collins + in return for Bertans. It's a lot to pay for a rental, but Portland might have to choke it down.


As a Portland fan I have to say that you are completely overthinking this.

Collins is off the market for anything other than a star. Simons is the same. There's no trade to be made revolving around Bertans that nets you anything more than a lottery protected first. Jody Allen is now the teams owner. And all signs point to her enjoying the ownership.

I understand this is a Wizards board, so I won't get into some long drawn out fight, but all these trades where Bertans is going out and returning high upside players and first round picks are ludicrous. He's an expiring contract who's a bench player on a good team. The Blazers aren't depleting their assets for a guy like that.

Blazers and Wizards are just bad trading partners. Portland doesn't have contracts to match Bertans, so you're left poaching Portland rotation players in an effort to make salaries match which negates the point of adding a player like Bertans.




Let me dissect your offer and tell you why it's completely horrendous from a Blazer point of view:

- Bertans fills an immediate need for the Blazers. He can log a solid amount of minutes at the 4, and is a really good shooter. That's the positive. Despite that Bertans is till just a bench player on a contending team. We can all agree I'd think.

- Mahinmi is out for an extended period of time, and has isn't very good even when he's healthy. Hassan Whiteside has his issues bu he's a SIGNIFICANTLY better player than Mahinmi at this point. The Blazers may have gotten a 4 who can contribute in Bertans but they've lost their rim protector and gotten significantly worse at the 5 to accomplish it. This trade is already looking like a bust for the Blazers.

Now let's add insult to injury:
- In order to shift the hole in the roster from the 4 to the 5 you have Portland also: Giving up Nassir Little who is a high upside player drafted in the 1st round, and/or draft picks. Taking on CJ Miles salary which cuts into Portland's cap space next year, or at a minimum their financial flexibility.

I just can't see any reason whatsover for Portland to make that trade. They give up assets, and it's arguable that they get worse in the short term as well. Due to Bertans salary, I can't come up with a single trade that works out well for both Portland and Washington.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,549
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#378 » by gambitx777 » Thu Nov 7, 2019 9:21 pm

As a wizards fan I can say we all feel you're frustration with other teams fans wanting to grab your guys for less than you value them. See the billion Beal trades every where that arnt even close. I think the idea started off as something like bertains Ian and miles for Whiteside and some kind of pick compensation if all your other bigs were healthy and you didn't need white side.and it got out of control.yes bertains is definitely worth something to someone and there are definitely going to be rlteams that will be desperate at the deadline there always are. Not sure Portland is gonna be that team
Roy The Natural wrote:
thinker07 wrote:Having watched most of Portland's games this year, I think they are standing on the ledge peering into the abyss.
Collins is out at least 4 months, Nurkic is out maybe until after the allstar break, Whiteside and Hood both picked up frustration/shoving players technicals in their last game, their offense is almost non-existent other than a lot of Lillard and CJ dribble and jack plays, their options for a starting PF are Andrew Tolliver and Mario Hezonja or going small with Hood (none of whom are very good defensive players). Look who the PF's are in the Western Conference. Who on Portland is going to defend against them?

Brian Windhorst said today that Portland is going to have to make a significant trade and almost certainly well before the trade deadline because they risk falling too far behind thinking that they could try and wait to see when Nurkic returns. If you look at the contracts they have that they'd consider trading it pretty much comes down to Whiteside $27 m, Bazemore $19 m, and Collins $4.5 m. Then they have their draft picks and Nassir Little and Simons.

Windhorst said the deal that makes the most sense is Bazemore + something good (picks, Nassir Little etc) for Danilo Gallinari - $22 m. I'm sure Portland likes Little but he is a ways off from being able to see the court with Portland - probably a couple of years. Portland doesn't even have a GLeague team to develop him more consistently. I don't think Portland will be able to hold on to him if their season continues to collapse.

And the ownership of Portland isn't exactly stable. The team is actually owned by Paul Allen's charitable foundation and run by his sister who has no experience in sports. It's somewhat likely that the foundation owning the team violates irs charity regulations. The whole team structure REALLY needs to win this year. So Little, who might be good 2 or 3 years from now is expendable. So are their picks, so is Collins. Is Sam Presti going to be anxious to help out their division mates? Or will he try to gouge them like he tries with every trade? I doubt that he gives Portland Gallinari in return for a 2nd round pick. And not that many teams are ready to trade players this early into the season?

So if Portland is forced to make a trade soon, it seems not out of the question to go back to Nate's original idea of doing something along the lines of Whiteside + Little and/or picks for some combination of Mahinmi, Bertans, CJ Miles. They could also do something around Collins + in return for Bertans. It's a lot to pay for a rental, but Portland might have to choke it down.


As a Portland fan I have to say that you are completely overthinking this.

Collins is off the market for anything other than a star. Simons is the same. There's no trade to be made revolving around Bertans that nets you anything more than a lottery protected first. Jody Allen is now the teams owner. And all signs point to her enjoying the ownership.

I understand this is a Wizards board, so I won't get into some long drawn out fight, but all these trades where Bertans is going out and returning high upside players and first round picks are ludicrous. He's an expiring contract who's a bench player on a good team. The Blazers aren't depleting their assets for a guy like that.

Blazers and Wizards are just bad trading partners. Portland doesn't have contracts to match Bertans, so you're left poaching Portland rotation players in an effort to make salaries match which negates the point of adding a player like Bertans.




Let me dissect your offer and tell you why it's completely horrendous from a Blazer point of view:

- Bertans fills an immediate need for the Blazers. He can log a solid amount of minutes at the 4, and is a really good shooter. That's the positive. Despite that Bertans is till just a bench player on a contending team. We can all agree I'd think.

- Mahinmi is out for an extended period of time, and has isn't very good even when he's healthy. Hassan Whiteside has his issues bu he's a SIGNIFICANTLY better player than Mahinmi at this point. The Blazers may have gotten a 4 who can contribute in Bertans but they've lost their rim protector and gotten significantly worse at the 5 to accomplish it. This trade is already looking like a bust for the Blazers.

Now let's add insult to injury:
- In order to shift the hole in the roster from the 4 to the 5 you have Portland also: Giving up Nassir Little who is a high upside player drafted in the 1st round, and/or draft picks. Taking on CJ Miles salary which cuts into Portland's cap space next year, or at a minimum their financial flexibility.

I just can't see any reason whatsover for Portland to make that trade. They give up assets, and it's arguable that they get worse in the short term as well. Due to Bertans salary, I can't come up with a single trade that works out well for both Portland and Washington.


Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,689
And1: 9,141
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#379 » by payitforward » Fri Nov 8, 2019 12:11 am

Roy The Natural wrote:...As a Portland fan ...I understand this is a Wizards board, ...but [size=120]all these trades where Bertans is going out and returning high upside players and first round picks are ludicrous. He's an expiring contract who's a bench player on a good team...

Seems obvious, doesn't it....

Roy The Natural wrote:There's no trade to be made revolving around Bertans that nets you anything more than a lottery protected first...

Wait. Are you saying you'll give us a lottery-protected first for Davis Bertans? Done!
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,689
And1: 9,141
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#380 » by payitforward » Fri Nov 8, 2019 12:15 am

gambitx777 wrote:...bertans is definitely worth something to someone ...

Yup. & whatever it is -- lets say a R2 pick two years from now for example -- we should definitely take it.

Return to Washington Wizards