ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,568
And1: 1,993
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#401 » by gambitx777 » Wed Feb 1, 2017 6:06 pm

payitforward wrote:
nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:Why? Ok Look at the market and look at denver? They have cap room, Not a free agent destination. The needs picks, What is Barton and Nurkic worth. Mahinmi, Has value in the fact that he is a good defencive center, denver needs that, They are not playing for anything right now to offer them a piece they are going to need, a vet guy for anchors that bench, when healthy and an unprotected pick in this years draft. That is worth Barton and Nurkic. Both of them together are worth a first, then you unprotect it to sweeten the deal. we are one wall injury away from not winning another game this year. This draft is amazing. Weather we should do it or not, idk but they would take that deal I feel.

Arguing with you is a waste of time because you are impervious to reality. Mahinmi does not have value. He is paid $16M a year and there is no guarantee that he will ever play again, much less play at the level he did for one brief season in his entire career. Nobody wants that albatross contract. Certainly, if Denver wanted a center, they'd be much happier with Nurkic than Mahinmi and a #23 pick.

I already agreed that I would make that trade. I'm just telling you, with absolute certainty, that Denver would never do it. You can choose to disagree with me if you want. But you would be deluding yourself.

Totally correct, nate. Even if Mahinmi does wind up somewhere else (as gambit suggested).

There is going to be no way to deal Mahinmi's contract until he's proven he can play again at a high level. Why would anyone take on that risk?

From our point of view, the only good thing about the trade would be ridding ourselves of that albatross contract. Barton is a 27 year old bench player, & Nurkic is a big question mark -- I like him, but he's still a big question mark. If I'm going to take an upside risk, I want to do it on a rookie not a guy in his 3d year.

I'd trade for Nurkic, just not that deal. & our problem is we don't have any asset that would make sense in a straight up trade for him.

I mean that's the point im trying to make here PIF, Barton and Nurkic together are not worth an unprotected pick in this draft. But those guys, plus take a contract of a useful but injured player is worth an unprotected pick in this draft. But, it depends on the GM in Denver and how bad he wants extra picks in this draft. Its totally possible that 17-23 in this draft is going to be a better player than all of the players in this deal put together. Its just depends, im not arguing that Mahinmi has value or doesn't im arguing that if someone wants a pick in this draft bad enough, taking mahinmi, who will be healthy again eventually and useful to them when he is, while giving up two players who are redundant on your team, might be a deal they could be willing to make.
User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 1,297
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#402 » by J-Ves » Wed Feb 1, 2017 6:07 pm

Vesper wrote:Is otto porter going to resign with you guys????

All signs point to yes
Vesper
Junior
Posts: 451
And1: 66
Joined: Dec 11, 2016

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#403 » by Vesper » Wed Feb 1, 2017 6:09 pm

J-Ves wrote:
Vesper wrote:Is otto porter going to resign with you guys????

All signs point to yes


What about your cap situation?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,674
And1: 23,169
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#404 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 1, 2017 6:10 pm

WizTom wrote:
nate33 wrote:
payitforward wrote:One other note: Ernie traded away our '04 R1 pick. Our '05 R1 pick went in the trade that brought Brendan Haywood to the Wizards long before Ernie's time. Since then, Ernie has traded away our '09, '14 & '16 R1 picks. But never 2 years in a row.

I could be wrong, but this gives me some confidence that he won't trade our 2017 pick, having dealt our 2016 pick. Especially given how well the team is doing -- i.e. no "jolt" excuse (i.e. "I have to be seen as doing... something!").

I don't have that same level of confidence in Ernie. I think if he could, he'd trade that 1st in a hurry. What will probably prevent it from happening are salary cap issues. We lack the filler contracts necessary to make a trade. (Our filler contracts have such negative value that they would partially if not totally offset the value of our draft pick.)



It's called "the Stepien rule." It prevents teams from trading successive draft picks.

I reckon if Ted Stepien never existed, it would probably be called "the Grunfeld rule."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Stepien

The Stepien rule doesn't apply. You are permitted to trade consecutive picks, you just can't trade consecutive future picks.

We can trade our 2017 pick even though we traded our 2016 pick because 2016 is in the past and is now irrelevant. What we can't do is trade our 2017 and our 2018 pick in a transaction right now.

If we traded our 2017 pick, we would be eligible to trade our 2018 pick at any time after the 2017 draft.
User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 1,297
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#405 » by J-Ves » Wed Feb 1, 2017 6:23 pm

Vesper wrote:
J-Ves wrote:
Vesper wrote:Is otto porter going to resign with you guys????

All signs point to yes


What about your cap situation?

I think the plan is to sign Porter and if the Wiz are over the lux tax line dump someone like Jason Smith + 2nd for cap relieve to get under that tax threshold.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,568
And1: 1,993
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#406 » by gambitx777 » Wed Feb 1, 2017 6:43 pm

Vesper wrote:
J-Ves wrote:
Vesper wrote:Is otto porter going to resign with you guys????

All signs point to yes


What about your cap situation?

No one is really worried about it.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,497
And1: 2,143
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#407 » by Dark Faze » Wed Feb 1, 2017 6:47 pm

have had two lakers fans tell me they'd take a first and filler for young and williams

i'd definitely consider it..
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,922
And1: 9,263
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#408 » by payitforward » Wed Feb 1, 2017 8:39 pm

nate33 wrote:
payitforward wrote:One other note: Ernie traded away our '04 R1 pick. Our '05 R1 pick went in the trade that brought Brendan Haywood to the Wizards long before Ernie's time. Since then, Ernie has traded away our '09, '14 & '16 R1 picks. But never 2 years in a row.

I could be wrong, but this gives me some confidence that he won't trade our 2017 pick, having dealt our 2016 pick. Especially given how well the team is doing -- i.e. no "jolt" excuse (i.e. "I have to be seen as doing... something!").

I don't have that same level of confidence in Ernie. I think if he could, he'd trade that 1st in a hurry. What will probably prevent it from happening are salary cap issues. We lack the filler contracts necessary to make a trade. (Our filler contracts have such negative value that they would partially if not totally offset the value of our draft pick.)

Don't disagree at all -- that's why I said "some" confidence. :) I.e. otherwise I'd be pretty sure he was going to at least try. And he might still try, as you see, and -- heaven forfend -- he might even succeed.

What is certain is that a good young prospect on a rookie contract would come in handy! As a piece of the future, to be sure, but as a bargain contract all the more!
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,922
And1: 9,263
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#409 » by payitforward » Wed Feb 1, 2017 8:41 pm

nate33 wrote:
JAR69 wrote:
nate33 wrote:What will probably prevent it from happening are salary cap issues. We lack the filler contracts necessary to make a trade. (Our filler contracts have such negative value that they would partially if not totally offset the value of our draft pick.)


So, technically, that is the silver lining of EG's summer dumpster fire signings. The only two that could be used for filler are so terrible that they can't be used for filler, stopping him from trading our R1 pick. :lol:


EG is playing 3 dimensional chess against himself. :lol:

Yup, and it's his particular talent to lose both sides of the game!
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,922
And1: 9,263
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#410 » by payitforward » Wed Feb 1, 2017 8:48 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
payitforward wrote:
nate33 wrote:Arguing with you is a waste of time because you are impervious to reality. Mahinmi does not have value. He is paid $16M a year and there is no guarantee that he will ever play again, much less play at the level he did for one brief season in his entire career. Nobody wants that albatross contract. Certainly, if Denver wanted a center, they'd be much happier with Nurkic than Mahinmi and a #23 pick.

I already agreed that I would make that trade. I'm just telling you, with absolute certainty, that Denver would never do it. You can choose to disagree with me if you want. But you would be deluding yourself.

Totally correct, nate. Even if Mahinmi does wind up somewhere else (as gambit suggested).

There is going to be no way to deal Mahinmi's contract until he's proven he can play again at a high level. Why would anyone take on that risk?

From our point of view, the only good thing about the trade would be ridding ourselves of that albatross contract. Barton is a 27 year old bench player, & Nurkic is a big question mark -- I like him, but he's still a big question mark. If I'm going to take an upside risk, I want to do it on a rookie not a guy in his 3d year.

I'd trade for Nurkic, just not that deal. & our problem is we don't have any asset that would make sense in a straight up trade for him.

I mean that's the point im trying to make here PIF, Barton and Nurkic together are not worth an unprotected pick in this draft. But those guys, plus take a contract of a useful but injured player is worth an unprotected pick in this draft. But, it depends on the GM in Denver and how bad he wants extra picks in this draft. Its totally possible that 17-23 in this draft is going to be a better player than all of the players in this deal put together. Its just depends, im not arguing that Mahinmi has value or doesn't im arguing that if someone wants a pick in this draft bad enough, taking mahinmi, who will be healthy again eventually and useful to them when he is, while giving up two players who are redundant on your team, might be a deal they could be willing to make.

Gambit... dude.... Taking a $16m/year contract for the next 3+ years w/o knowing whether that player will ever play again? Vs. you get a mid-R1 pick? & give up a young prospect & a solid journeyman+ player?

Read my lips: No. That's not a deal Denver would do. Nor any other team.

Think about it: if Mahinmi is never going to come back Denver nixes the deal. If Mahinmi is going to come back, then we nix the deal.

Drop it please.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,568
And1: 1,993
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#411 » by gambitx777 » Wed Feb 1, 2017 8:56 pm

payitforward wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
payitforward wrote:Totally correct, nate. Even if Mahinmi does wind up somewhere else (as gambit suggested).

There is going to be no way to deal Mahinmi's contract until he's proven he can play again at a high level. Why would anyone take on that risk?

From our point of view, the only good thing about the trade would be ridding ourselves of that albatross contract. Barton is a 27 year old bench player, & Nurkic is a big question mark -- I like him, but he's still a big question mark. If I'm going to take an upside risk, I want to do it on a rookie not a guy in his 3d year.

I'd trade for Nurkic, just not that deal. & our problem is we don't have any asset that would make sense in a straight up trade for him.

I mean that's the point im trying to make here PIF, Barton and Nurkic together are not worth an unprotected pick in this draft. But those guys, plus take a contract of a useful but injured player is worth an unprotected pick in this draft. But, it depends on the GM in Denver and how bad he wants extra picks in this draft. Its totally possible that 17-23 in this draft is going to be a better player than all of the players in this deal put together. Its just depends, im not arguing that Mahinmi has value or doesn't im arguing that if someone wants a pick in this draft bad enough, taking mahinmi, who will be healthy again eventually and useful to them when he is, while giving up two players who are redundant on your team, might be a deal they could be willing to make.

Gambit... dude.... Taking a $16m/year contract for the next 3+ years w/o knowing whether that player will ever play again? Vs. you get a mid-R1 pick? & give up a young prospect & a solid journeyman+ player?

Read my lips: No. That's not a deal Denver would do. Nor any other team.

Think about it: if Mahinmi is never going to come back Denver nixes the deal. If Mahinmi is going to come back, then we nix the deal.

Drop it please.

I highly doubt Mahinmi is in any danger of not playing ever again. If he is that might make him more valuable do to a possible retirement. even health I say we move him, we clearly don't need him, so if he comes back and plays well, why not trade him. I just have a different opinion than you on this, I'm not saying your wrong, everything you says makes sense.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,674
And1: 23,169
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#412 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 1, 2017 9:08 pm

Vesper wrote:Is otto porter going to resign with you guys????

Yes. He is a RFA. I am certain we will match any offer.
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#413 » by stevemcqueen1 » Wed Feb 1, 2017 9:23 pm

Dark Faze wrote:have had two lakers fans tell me they'd take a first and filler for young and williams

i'd definitely consider it..


Heyull no. Not trading our first to get a 30 year old Lou Williams and Nick Young's clown ass back.

This is the kind of terrible short sighted trade that fans would still hold against the FO a decade from now.
User avatar
Error Afflalo
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 687
Joined: Feb 21, 2009
Location: DMV
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#414 » by Error Afflalo » Thu Feb 2, 2017 2:12 am

Pass on moving a first for Lou and/or Young.

Will Barton, on the other hand...
deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#415 » by deneem4 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 2:48 am

1st for Lou and Tarik black?
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#416 » by Meliorus » Thu Feb 2, 2017 3:22 am

Error Afflalo wrote:Pass on moving a first for Lou and/or Young.

Will Barton, on the other hand...



Will Bartons are available in the 2nd round. Why not draft a Will Barton. Why trade a 1st round pick for a Will Barton?
deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#417 » by deneem4 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 4:00 am

http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine

Pierce thj to wizards
Nicholson 2017 1st to Hawks

Clippers trade Pierce
For Sefolosha and Thorton

Hawks trade
Sefolosha thj
For wiz 2017 pick and nicholson

Wiz gets a real bench
Sato
THJ
Oubre
Pierce
Smith

Clips get a legit sf

Hawks takes some salary but get a 2017 1st from the wiz....
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 1,297
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#418 » by J-Ves » Thu Feb 2, 2017 4:03 am

Error Afflalo wrote:Pass on moving a first for Lou and/or Young.

Will Barton, on the other hand...

Lou would help us way more than Barton.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,412
And1: 6,817
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#419 » by TGW » Thu Feb 2, 2017 4:12 am

deneem4 wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine

Pierce thj to wizards
Nicholson 2017 1st to Hawks

Clippers trade Pierce
For Sefolosha and Thorton

Hawks trade
Sefolosha thj
For wiz 2017 pick and nicholson

Wiz gets a real bench
Sato
THJ
Oubre
Pierce
Smith
e
Clips get a legit sf

Hawks takes some salary but get a 2017 1st from the wiz....


This should be in the lyricalrico hall of fame
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,217
And1: 8,036
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXII 

Post#420 » by Dat2U » Thu Feb 2, 2017 4:30 am

Out of all the threads on this board, this trade thread is the most painful to read. It's just one horrific trade suggestion after another. I can't believe someone actually suggested the acquisition of Nick Young to help in a PLAYOFF run!

Return to Washington Wizards