DCZards wrote:payitforward wrote:tontoz wrote:Poole is currently 6th in the league in 3 pointers made per game .
How many 3-pointers a guy makes per game is NOT a measure of how good he is. Any more than how many points a guy scores per game is a measure of how good he is.
You win games by 1) having more possessions than the opponent &/or 2) scoring more efficiently in those possessions.
If you do both, you cannot lose. Period. That's just arithmetic.
If you do neither, you cannot win. Period. Ditto -- arithmetic.
No exceptions.
So it matters how many possessions you gain or lose for your team. & it matters how efficiently you score your points. Because, essentially, those are the only things you can do to help your team win.*
Jordan is scoring efficiently -- he's posting a .591 TS% on high usage. That's good.
But Jordan also turns the ball over a whole lot, gets 1/2 the offensive boards average for a 2 guard, & fouls 50% more often than average for a 2 guard.
The overall result is that he is way way worse than average for an NBA guard.
Is he better than last year? Sure! But, so what? He's not good. Period. There is no counter-argument.
* I say "essentially," because assists & blocks & defensive boards also help, of course. But they are relatively minor compared to the above.
Tontoz posted a simple statistical fact. I don’t think he was suggesting that Poole is a good player.
Not sure why you think it required an explanation of what constitutes a good player.
I think I'd just had a 2d afternoon coffee -- sorry tontoz!!





















