ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XL

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,196
And1: 465
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#461 » by Silvie Lysandra » Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:06 am

pcbothwel wrote:LAL had the 2nd pick two years in a row and appearing to be laughable on the court and in the front office. But then the GOAT decides to just up and sign there. They werent a good franchise, but simply the Lakers and Lebron wanted to be in LA.
In fact, they drafted poorly enough that they had to include multiple future picks, both #2 picks, and solid filler in order to get AD...who stated he was going to LAL no matter what and was in the last year of his contract. The reason they gave up both Ball and Ingram is because both were underperforming.


The Lakers do have built in advantages, because they're the Lakers. But Ball and Ingram were decent picks and they drafted very well outside the top of the draft. Also if he was going there no matter what, why trade the value at all?

They drafted Ingram instead of Jaylen Brown and Jamal Murray also. Both players who were outperforming Ingram easily. They drafted Ball over Tatum, Fox, Isaac, Bam, and Mitchell. If they drafted better then they probably could of given up less to NOP.


I'm not even sure this is true wrt Brown vs Ingram. Ingram had a somewhat worse rookie year, but was also a year younger. As of now, they're more or less on the same trajectory of production (And interestingly, that trajectory looks a LOT like Bradley Beal). Brown also had the advantage of getting to play on a playoff basketball team his first few years. Lonzo over Tatum was a bit bad but they still got value out of the pick which is what matters. They found Bonga, Hart, Kuzma and Wagner, who are rotation players in the NBA. But you're right, the Lakers do have too many built in advantages to really judge, but they've also definitely maximized those advantages, unlike, say, the New York Knicks.


GSW is considered a great franchise, but they have struck out a ton Steph Curry is the only reason they matter. From 2016 until now they have continually struck out in the draft to help provide ancillary pieces around Steph. Taking Damian Jones over Zubac and Brogdan. Taking Jacob Evans over Spellman, Brunson, Graham, Mitchell Robinson, Gary Trent, and even Bonga. And now Wiseman over Ball. Overpaying to keep Klay and Green. We could go on.


I mean, Steph Curry is one of the all time great draft picks when you consider he was a throwaway #7 pick. Klay was a tremendous pick as well. Drafting Draymond late. Like Nate33 said, getting rotation players late is a massive victory. Getting a DPOY level player at #30 is an even bigger one.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,240
And1: 2,798
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#462 » by pcbothwel » Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:36 pm

Steph is the GOAT and Green was the engine. Im tired of the overrating of Klay on this board. Beal is a better player and has been for years. Klay was a really good defender early on, but not a great one. He's really fallen off the last 5 years and people just ignored it with KD coming there and winning the title.
Klay doesn't, nor has he ever, done anything besides shoot 3's and play cerebral defense. He doesnt even dribble, let alone pass/create. He doesnt rebound and doesnt contribute to team rebounding.

You give me a choice of Prime Otto (23/24) vs Prime Klay (24/25), I take Otto on my team
/Rant...lol
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,937
And1: 9,319
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#463 » by queridiculo » Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:12 pm

You lost me at Porter over Klay.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#464 » by NatP4 » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:21 pm

pcbothwel wrote:Steph is the GOAT and Green was the engine. Im tired of the overrating of Klay on this board. Beal is a better player and has been for years. Klay was a really good defender early on, but not a great one. He's really fallen off the last 5 years and people just ignored it with KD coming there and winning the title.
Klay doesn't, nor has he ever, done anything besides shoot 3's and play cerebral defense. He doesnt even dribble, let alone pass/create. He doesnt rebound and doesnt contribute to team rebounding.

You give me a choice of Prime Otto (23/24) vs Prime Klay (24/25), I take Otto on my team
/Rant...lol


Imagine Otto on those pre-KD GS teams. He would’ve been an absolute monster.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,240
And1: 2,798
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#465 » by pcbothwel » Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:15 pm

queridiculo wrote:You lost me at Porter over Klay.


That fine... Klay's absolute BEST year (A really good year BTW) was in 2014-15 at age 24.
Per 36 over 77 games: 24.5 & 3.6 - AST:TOV ratio = 1.5:1, TS = 59%

Otto over the course of 2 years (2016-17) at age 23/24:
Per 36 over 157 games: 16 & 7 - AST:TOV ratio = 3:1, TS of 62%

So Otto averaged twice as many rebounds, an AST:TOV ratio that was TWICE as good, and was a more efficient.

But wait, you may say "Well, Otto was clearly better there, but what about the 9 point scoring difference?".
True, Klay did score 9 more points, but Otto took 12 FGA to get his 16 points, where Klay took 19 FGA to get his 24.5.

So Klay took 7 more shots to score 9 more points.

Defensively is tough. Both were better team defenders than shut down man defenders. For the years listed, Both averaged the same STOCKS (Steals + Blocks), with Otto more Steals and Klay more Blocks.
***It should be noted that this was Klay's career high in STOCKS and he hasn't been near it since. Whereas Otto has been consistent his entire career...but I digress.

I think we can say they were about even, though some "Rollup" stats like DRPM and RAPTOR point to Otto being quite a bit better defensively.

All that, and it doesn't take into account that the 5 players Klay played the most minutes with were:
Curry (2000), Draymond(1961), Barnes(1657), Iggy(980), and Bogut(1302)

While Otto played most of his minutes with:
Beal, Gortat, Kieff, Wall, Oubre

You read that right. Otto played more minutes with Gortat and Kieff than he did John Wall over those two years...

Side note. Its another reason im interested in GSW picks in a few years. I think Klay is washed at 32 and two SERIOUS injuries.
I think he'll be Davis Bertans, but making 40M each of the next 3 years instead of 16M.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,183
And1: 7,974
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#466 » by Dat2U » Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:30 pm

Can the Wizards get a starting C w/o giving up a 1st round pick, Avdija or Hachimura?

Troy Brown Jr, Moritz Wagner, Issac Bonga, expirings like Lopez or Ish. Does this amount to anything?
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,158
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#467 » by DCZards » Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:59 pm

Dat2U wrote:Can the Wizards get a starting C w/o giving up a 1st round pick, Avdija or Hachimura?

Troy Brown Jr, Moritz Wagner, Issac Bonga, expirings like Lopez or Ish. Does this amount to anything?

I don’t think the Zards should be pressed about getting a starting center. The combo of Lopez, Wagner & Len are serviceable enough for this season and they get Bryant back next season.

Brown, Wagner, Bonga, etc. aren’t likely to get a quality center and I wouldn’t consider moving Deni, Rui or a first for anything but a first-rate center.
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,658
And1: 3,730
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#468 » by Frichuela » Wed Feb 24, 2021 12:07 am

Dat2U wrote:Can the Wizards get a starting C w/o giving up a 1st round pick, Avdija or Hachimura?

Troy Brown Jr, Moritz Wagner, Issac Bonga, expirings like Lopez or Ish. Does this amount to anything?


Maybe try to trade Wagner+Brown for Bamba? This is a gamble but...Bamba’s performance in very limited minutes is not that bad...
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,183
And1: 7,974
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#469 » by Dat2U » Wed Feb 24, 2021 12:55 am

DCZards wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Can the Wizards get a starting C w/o giving up a 1st round pick, Avdija or Hachimura?

Troy Brown Jr, Moritz Wagner, Issac Bonga, expirings like Lopez or Ish. Does this amount to anything?

I don’t think the Zards should be pressed about getting a starting center. The combo of Lopez, Wagner & Len are serviceable enough for this season and they get Bryant back next season.

Brown, Wagner, Bonga, etc. aren’t likely to get a quality center and I wouldn’t consider moving Deni, Rui or a first for anything but a first-rate center.


Serviceable? Serviceable doesn't win playoff games champ.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,158
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#470 » by DCZards » Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:19 am

Dat2U wrote:
DCZards wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Can the Wizards get a starting C w/o giving up a 1st round pick, Avdija or Hachimura?

Troy Brown Jr, Moritz Wagner, Issac Bonga, expirings like Lopez or Ish. Does this amount to anything?

I don’t think the Zards should be pressed about getting a starting center. The combo of Lopez, Wagner & Len are serviceable enough for this season and they get Bryant back next season.

Brown, Wagner, Bonga, etc. aren’t likely to get a quality center and I wouldn’t consider moving Deni, Rui or a first for anything but a first-rate center.


Serviceable? Serviceable doesn't win playoff games champ.

Not really concerned about winning a playoff series this year. More focused on developing Rui, Deni and the other youngins. And I seriously doubt that we’re going to get a significant upgrade at center with what the Zards are likely to make available in a trade.

Who would you target?
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,117
And1: 20,579
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#471 » by dckingsfan » Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:33 am

Frichuela wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Can the Wizards get a starting C w/o giving up a 1st round pick, Avdija or Hachimura?

Troy Brown Jr, Moritz Wagner, Issac Bonga, expirings like Lopez or Ish. Does this amount to anything?

Maybe try to trade Wagner+Brown for Bamba? This is a gamble but...Bamba’s performance in very limited minutes is not that bad...

I brought that up in the off-season. I didn't think that Brown was a fit with our current coach and still don't. I didn't consider that Bamba wouldn't be playing either. I guess I would do Brown + Bonga for Bamba. I wouldn't mind Bamba + Bryant as the Cs for next year. But given the dive Brown and Bonga have taken why does Orlando do that? I guess if they saw Brown as a big backup PG.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#472 » by NatP4 » Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:11 am

Bertans for Robert Williams using Boston’s massive trade exception.

Boston is in a tough spot with horrible PG play and a coach that refuses to play Williams over Tristan Thompson. They would love to add shooting, but the point is, they are actually in a really tough spot because of the Kemba contract. Something has to give. Williams looks like an absolute future stud.

These are Williams’ career per36 numbers(1000 minutes):

13.3 points 11.9 rebounds 3.8 blocks 1.9 assists 1.9 steals 1.9 turnovers on 72.3% TS.

Losing Bertans would be tough, but it opens the door to allow Brown Jr&Bonga to play more. It’s really a move for the future that could make us better now as well. We could get Brown Jr back on the court to play up his trade value or see if he’s a core piece of the future.

Westbrook Neto
Mathews Brown Jr
Beal Bonga
Hachimura Avdija
Williams Lopez Wagner
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#473 » by NatP4 » Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:25 am

Also, why didn’t we draft Robert Williams :noway:
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,158
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#474 » by DCZards » Wed Feb 24, 2021 3:41 am

I’d make that trade with Boston for Robert Williams. He seems to be coming into his own.

I’m not sure Boston makes that trade tho. I don’t think they picked up his option but his recent play may have convinced Boston that he’s a keeper.

The Celts probably see Williams as their center of the future moreso than Thompson.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#475 » by Ruzious » Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:06 pm

DCZards wrote:I’d make that trade with Boston for Robert Williams. He seems to be coming into his own.

I’m not sure Boston makes that trade tho. I don’t think they picked up his option but his recent play may have convinced Boston that he’s a keeper.

The Celts probably see Williams as their center of the future moreso than Thompson.

I think so - Time Lord Williams is a helluva player, and I doubt he's going anywhere. Btw, Boston did pick up his option.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#476 » by Ruzious » Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:09 pm

NatP4 wrote:Also, why didn’t we draft Robert Williams :noway:

There were supposedly off-court issues, but yeah - we should have picked him.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#477 » by Ruzious » Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:17 pm

Dat2U wrote:Can the Wizards get a starting C w/o giving up a 1st round pick, Avdija or Hachimura?

Troy Brown Jr, Moritz Wagner, Issac Bonga, expirings like Lopez or Ish. Does this amount to anything?

And w/o giving up Beal. Anything's possible, but I think it's very unlikely. They may be pieces to add to a package.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,554
And1: 23,017
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#478 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:02 pm

Centers are funny. A lot of times, the raw athletic types take about 5 or 6 years to figure things out and actually become plus defenders. But their rookie contracts are only 4 years long so the team that drafted them sometimes just gives up on them so they are obtainable as restricted free agents. The team that acquires them gets a pretty good center that someone else spent all the time developing.

Recent examples are:
- Bismack Biyombo
- Ian Mahinmi
- Richaun Holmes
- Nerlens Noel
- Julius Randle

A couple more guys weren't signed as free agents, but they were acquired via trade for really cheap and then locked into a cheap contract just before they suddenly became good, guys like
- Ivica Zubac
- Jakob Poeltl

I think this is definitely an avenue to pursue. Guys on my radar who might be available this summer in free agency for relatively cheap and yet might still make "the leap" in the not-too-distant future include:
- Wendell Carter
- Harry Giles

Guys who are free agents in 2022 but their teams might be willing to trade them sooner include:
- Robert Williams
- Mo Bamba
- Mitchell Robinson
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#479 » by Ruzious » Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:21 pm

Get Bamba.

Btw, I think the knicks got blind lucky that Randle has stepped up from an empty stats guy to a legit high quality player. Last season, he made 27.7% of his 3's; now he's at 41.4%, but it's not just that. His BPM numbers - both offensive and defensive are far better than ever - this is the 1st year he's had a positive DBPM. Same deal with his ORtg and DRtg. His assists are way up while his to's have stayed the same. Knicks are 7th seed in the East now because of him.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,554
And1: 23,017
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XL 

Post#480 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:28 pm

Ruzious wrote:Get Bamba.

Btw, I think the knicks got blind lucky that Randle has stepped up from an empty stats guy to a legit high quality player. Last season, he made 27.7% of his 3's; now he's at 41.4%, but it's not just that. His BPM numbers - both offensive and defensive are far better than ever - this is the 1st year he's had a positive DBPM. Same deal with his ORtg and DRtg. His assists are way up while his to's have stayed the same. Knicks are 7th seed in the East now because of him.

That's what I mean.

Defense, for a center in particular, is complicated. Only the really, really smart, instinctive guys like Tim Duncan, defended well in their first year or two. And the odds of finding a really smart instinctive guy who is also 7 feet tall and athletic are relatively slim (because there aren't that many 7 feet tall athletic people to begin with). Most guys just need a lot of reps, 4 or 5 years worth. And then, suddenly, they're pretty good defensively.

Return to Washington Wizards