Political Roundtable Part XXV

TGW · Post #521 » by **TGW** » Mon Mar 11, 2019 8:44 pm

Uh oh....methinks Pelosi saw the Mueller Report, and is getting ahead of the situation before **** hits the fan.

Pointgod · Post #522 » by **Pointgod** » Mon Mar 11, 2019 8:44 pm

gtn130 wrote:Right Wingers now calling AOC a crisis actor lmaooooo

Say what you want about the Democrats but I have no reason why anyone would want these bunch of idiots that believe in crisis actors dictating the direction of the country.

Wizardspride · Post #523 » by **Wizardspride** » Mon Mar 11, 2019 8:58 pm

TGW wrote:Uh oh....methinks Pelosi saw the Mueller Report, and is getting ahead of the situation before **** hits the fan.

Read on Twitter

No way she's seen the report....assuming Mueller's even written it.

Now what she MAY have seen is recent polling saying Trump shouldn't be impeached yet.

The same polling also says Trump is a liar, a racist, did some shady stuff regarding the election and the Mueller report should be made public etc

EDIT: I just read her statement in its entirety and context is everything.

Wizardspride · Post #524 » by **Wizardspride** » Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:05 pm

Pointgod wrote:
gtn130 wrote:Right Wingers now calling AOC a crisis actor lmaooooo

Say what you want about the Democrats but I have no reason why anyone would want these bunch of idiots that believe in crisis actors dictating the direction of the country.

These are the same people who haven't seen a SINGLE piece of evidence that would make them question Trump in regards to Russia yet think it's as clear as the nose on your face that HRC killed Seth Rich, ran a pedophile ring out of a pizza place etc.

Ponder that **** for a moment.

Yeah, I know... :-?

Pointgod · Post #525 » by **Pointgod** » Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:00 pm

Wizardspride wrote:
TGW wrote:Uh oh....methinks Pelosi saw the Mueller Report, and is getting ahead of the situation before **** hits the fan.

Read on Twitter

No way she's seen the report....assuming Mueller's even written it.

Now what she MAY have seen is recent polling saying Trump shouldn't be impeached yet.

The same polling also says Trump is a liar, a racist, did some shady stuff regarding the election and the Mueller report should be made public etc

EDIT: I just read her statement in its entirety and context is everything.

Shocker TGW is taking a quote completely out of context and misrepresenting facts. Here’s the whole quote:

I’m not for impeachment. This is news. I’m going to give you some news right now because I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this: Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/03/11/feature/nancy-pelosi-on-impeaching-president-trump-hes-just-not-worth-it/?utm_term=.723b68d8792a

Only a fool would believe that Trump hasn’t committed numerous impeachable offences but it’s all about what you can prove.

Pointgod · Post #526 » by **Pointgod** » Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:03 pm

Wizardspride wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
gtn130 wrote:Right Wingers now calling AOC a crisis actor lmaooooo

Say what you want about the Democrats but I have no reason why anyone would want these bunch of idiots that believe in crisis actors dictating the direction of the country.

These are the same people who haven't seen a SINGLE piece of evidence that would make them question Trump in regards to Russia yet think it's as clear as the nose on your face that HRC killed Seth Rich, ran a pedophile ring out of a pizza place etc.

Ponder that **** for a moment.

Yeah, I know...

Listen man. If Trump is re-elected then I’m sorry to say the U.S. deserves everything that’s going to happen to them. I know it’s harsh but there’s literally more people on the right side of the issue than not.

dckingsfan · Post #527 » by **dckingsfan** » Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:40 pm

I will say one thing - Nancy Pelosi is holding it together nicely. Her TS% is really high right now.

TGW · Post #528 » by **TGW** » Mon Mar 11, 2019 11:24 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:
TGW wrote:Uh oh....methinks Pelosi saw the Mueller Report, and is getting ahead of the situation before **** hits the fan.

Read on Twitter

No way she's seen the report....assuming Mueller's even written it.

Now what she MAY have seen is recent polling saying Trump shouldn't be impeached yet.

The same polling also says Trump is a liar, a racist, did some shady stuff regarding the election and the Mueller report should be made public etc

EDIT: I just read her statement in its entirety and context is everything.

Shocker TGW is taking a quote completely out of context and misrepresenting facts. Here’s the whole quote:

I’m not for impeachment. This is news. I’m going to give you some news right now because I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this: Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/03/11/feature/nancy-pelosi-on-impeaching-president-trump-hes-just-not-worth-it/?utm_term=.723b68d8792a

Only a fool would believe that Trump hasn’t committed numerous impeachable offences but it’s all about what you can prove.

You’re telling me after three years of nonstop “smoking guns”, there’s no proof? That’s not what russiagate conspiracy pushers were saying since 2016.

The russiagate peddlers owe the American people an apology for spewing bull for three years with no evidence.

Wizardspride · Post #529 » by **Wizardspride** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:22 am

Pointgod wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Say what you want about the Democrats but I have no reason why anyone would want these bunch of idiots that believe in crisis actors dictating the direction of the country.

These are the same people who haven't seen a SINGLE piece of evidence that would make them question Trump in regards to Russia yet think it's as clear as the nose on your face that HRC killed Seth Rich, ran a pedophile ring out of a pizza place etc.

Ponder that **** for a moment.

Yeah, I know...

Listen man. If Trump is re-elected then I’m sorry to say the U.S. deserves everything that’s going to happen to them. I know it’s harsh but there’s literally more people on the right side of the issue than not.

Heck, even if Trump loses I still think the U.S. electorate in general just sucks.

Pointgod · Post #530 » by **Pointgod** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:21 am

TGW wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:No way she's seen the report....assuming Mueller's even written it.

Now what she MAY have seen is recent polling saying Trump shouldn't be impeached yet.

The same polling also says Trump is a liar, a racist, did some shady stuff regarding the election and the Mueller report should be made public etc

EDIT: I just read her statement in its entirety and context is everything.

Shocker TGW is taking a quote completely out of context and misrepresenting facts. Here’s the whole quote:

I’m not for impeachment. This is news. I’m going to give you some news right now because I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this: Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/03/11/feature/nancy-pelosi-on-impeaching-president-trump-hes-just-not-worth-it/?utm_term=.723b68d8792a

Only a fool would believe that Trump hasn’t committed numerous impeachable offences but it’s all about what you can prove.

You’re telling me after three years of nonstop “smoking guns”, there’s no proof? That’s not what russiagate conspiracy pushers were saying since 2016.

The russiagate peddlers owe the American people an apology for spewing bull for three years with no evidence.

What you think that Trump is innocent and didn’t sell out the country to Russia?

Wait never mind don’t answer that question.....

stilldropin20 · Post #531 » by **stilldropin20** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 2:38 am

Pointgod wrote:
TGW wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Shocker TGW is taking a quote completely out of context and misrepresenting facts. Here’s the whole quote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/03/11/feature/nancy-pelosi-on-impeaching-president-trump-hes-just-not-worth-it/?utm_term=.723b68d8792a

Only a fool would believe that Trump hasn’t committed numerous impeachable offences but it’s all about what you can prove.

You’re telling me after three years of nonstop “smoking guns”, there’s no proof? That’s not what russiagate conspiracy pushers were saying since 2016.

The russiagate peddlers owe the American people an apology for spewing bull for three years with no evidence.

What you think that Trump is innocent and didn’t sell out the country to Russia?

Wait never mind don’t answer that question.....

so what was the big "get" that russia got out of this...some luke warm press from trump? "it would be nice if we got along with russia?" Or what it, "he says he didn't do it, i believe him." :lol:

big sellout there. almost as bad as selling Putin 20% of our uranium reserves. almost. :noway:

FAH1223 · Post #532 » by **FAH1223** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 3:27 am

Read on Twitter

TGW · Post #533 » by **TGW** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:11 am

Pointgod wrote:
TGW wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Shocker TGW is taking a quote completely out of context and misrepresenting facts. Here’s the whole quote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/03/11/feature/nancy-pelosi-on-impeaching-president-trump-hes-just-not-worth-it/?utm_term=.723b68d8792a

Only a fool would believe that Trump hasn’t committed numerous impeachable offences but it’s all about what you can prove.

You’re telling me after three years of nonstop “smoking guns”, there’s no proof? That’s not what russiagate conspiracy pushers were saying since 2016.

The russiagate peddlers owe the American people an apology for spewing bull for three years with no evidence.

What you think that Trump is innocent and didn’t sell out the country to Russia?

Wait never mind don’t answer that question.....

Dude, until you have evidence that he sold the country to Russia, STFU. I don't want to hear no more of your conspiracy-spewing nonsense.

pancakes3 · Post #534 » by **pancakes3** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:16 am

yeah, let's get our panties in a bunch over what constitutes collusion or obstruction while SD casually promulgates the bold faced lie of Uranium One.

stilldropin20 · Post #535 » by **stilldropin20** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:23 pm

i mean...roger stone and paul manaforte literally started one of the very first PAC...which allowed them to enrich themselves while essentially access to politicians. While there's little to no evidence that the country was "sold out" by Manaforte and Stone clients like Reagan, Buchannon, Quail, and now Trump they did enrich themselves(not a crime) while promulgating the worst part of politics: PAC money.

That said PAC didn't have to be a bad thing. In fact it was suppose to be a good thing...kinda like a Union...and a CBA...these are all good things. And PAC money was suppose to be good because (all) the little guys were suppose to "band together" via a PAC to elect their candidate.

But in the end the PAC's were mostly organized by elites which in the end made them funded by elites.

And foreigners have been (finding ways) to fund PAC's since their inception.

So if Manaforte and Stone both do 3-10 years for past crimes I could care less to be honest. That said, i find it disgusting that our FBI looked at both of them multiple times in the past and let both "walk." And now, since trump was elected the FBI threw the book at manaforte.

In the end...the biggest evidence against Trump for conspiring with foreigners is that Trump heard via public knowledge that Wiki leaks had emails and everyone kept saying out loud that the Russians hacked the DNC and HRC. But as of right now...there is not one single shred of evidence that Russian hacked them. Nor is there any evidence that Russia bought the emails or even possessed the emails. Per wikileaks, Wikileaks (a journalism site) has a source and released emails given to them by their source. No different than all the sources from CNN saying bad things about trump 95% of the time all day long.

We are left with the DNC completely and entirely setting up Trump. They paid Perkins Coie. Who paid fusion who paid Steele who met with the exact same russians right before and right after the "Trump tower meeting." <--That literally tells you all you need to know. And this investigation completely comes down to "russia, if you're listening" and the trump tower meeting. and in the trump tower meeting, the russians set up the trump campaign by promising dirt on clinton.

Collusion is a joke. Conspiracy is a joke. None of it was true. ever. The FBI either "fell for it" which is what they will claim in the years to come as they come under investigation for all of this. Or they purposefully investigated Trump just to find something...anything on him and squeeze him. All of which forced Trump to govern one way or another. Hardline GOP(to survive mueller and impeachment). All Because they(both GOP and DNC) launched him under investigation immediately.

No president deserves this. We must protect our country form Manchurian type candidates while at the same time we must also protect our Laws must be immediately changed to prevent this from ever occurring again.

if we launch investigations into presidents...immediately...those presidents immedately become beholden to congress who have the power to impeach if they dont like the president's politics. This is how the FBI and congress can collude to keep 3rd party candidates (or outsiders like trump) out of office or ineffective. because lets all be honest with each other...you launch an investigation like what we've seen with trump (and clinton) into any president months into the job while his AG recuses himself out fo the job and you just leave the guy or gal out to dry. Which is not fair to those who elected that president.

If something nefarious truly happened. There would be evidence. Show it to us and impeach the guy. Ive said that since day 1. But 3 years later of investigations and we still have nothing. The NSA is keeping magadata on phone calls and the FBI has interviewed every single witness it can find. Still Not one shred of evidence. :nonono:

Not suppose to work this way. The investigation has been fully exhausted. its time for libs to find another path to victory in 2020.

Pointgod · Post #536 » by **Pointgod** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:50 pm

TGW wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
TGW wrote:

You’re telling me after three years of nonstop “smoking guns”, there’s no proof? That’s not what russiagate conspiracy pushers were saying since 2016.

The russiagate peddlers owe the American people an apology for spewing bull for three years with no evidence.

What you think that Trump is innocent and didn’t sell out the country to Russia?

Wait never mind don’t answer that question.....

Dude, until you have evidence that he sold the country to Russia, STFU. I don't want to hear no more of your conspiracy-spewing nonsense.

We know Trump was negotiating a Trump tower deal with Putin throughout the campaign that he lied about. We know for a fact Paul Manafort have private campaign data to some Russian stooge of Putins. You think Putin did this out of the kindness of his heart because he believed Trump is what’s best for the country? Those are just two examples from over 50 publicly known contacts with Trumps campaign and Russia. Think about all the details we don’t know or Trumps people are still lying about. The only question is if Trumps people were smart enough to insulate him from criminal activity. The guy obstructs Justice everyday on twitter but please keep holding water for this guy. I doubt if President Hillary Clinton’s campaign had all these connections with Russia you’d be holding the wait and see approach

Pointgod · Post #537 » by **Pointgod** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:50 pm

pancakes3 wrote:yeah, let's get our panties in a bunch over what constitutes collusion or obstruction while SD casually promulgates the bold faced lie of Uranium One.

Don’t forget both STD and TGW pushed the Seth Rich conspiracy theory which the originator even admitted is bull.

dckingsfan · Post #538 » by **dckingsfan** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 2:11 pm

Also - keep an eye on GDP growth - down to 2.6 percent from October to December.

FAH1223 · Post #539 » by **FAH1223** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:49 pm

Read on Twitter

pancakes3 · Post #540 » by **pancakes3** » Tue Mar 12, 2019 6:00 pm

there was a black girl in florda earlier this admission cycle whose scores were flagged after a 200 pt increase