ImageImageImageImageImage

NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 1,297
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#541 » by J-Ves » Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:35 am

I havn't seen a minute of Celtics basketball this year, how are thy so good on defense?
Illmatic12
RealGM
Posts: 10,161
And1: 8,459
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#542 » by Illmatic12 » Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:05 pm

J-Ves wrote:I havn't seen a minute of Celtics basketball this year, how are thy so good on defense?

From what I've seen, Horford has been Boston's best player season.

He's not a voracious rim protector or rebounder, but he does everything else you want from a modern 5. Very mobile and great anticipation on defense. He has a really impressive IQ on that end and works perfectly in concert with their switching defensive wings.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,876
And1: 10,477
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: RE: Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#543 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:44 pm

closg00 wrote:Wow, the Celts pulled it off, they are no joke. I wonder if they would have had the same record with Hayward starting?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Nope.

They are so much better without Hayward. They are quicker defensively and they are bigger starting Brown and Tatum at the wings and Morris at the four.

Hayward would have made them more of an ISO team and they would have been ball watching and much worse defensively.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using RealGM mobile app
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
Gant
RealGM
Posts: 11,065
And1: 15,674
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#544 » by Gant » Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:02 pm

J-Ves wrote:I havn't seen a minute of Celtics basketball this year, how are thy so good on defense?


1) They were tiny last year at the smaller spots. They replaced IT, Bradley and Crowder with Kyrie, Brown, and Tatum, gaining multiple inches at each position. Tatum and Brown are extremely good defenders despite their youth. Kyrie has been shockingly better than expected on D.

2) Last year they were soft and mostly short-armed in the frontcourt. They replaced Olynyk, Amir Johnson, and Zeller with the mighty Baynes who takes the heat off Horford by battling the huge guys and leaving Horford free to roam on defense. Morris is tough too.

3) They're deep all the way through the rotation on D. Rozier and Smart are a great defensive backcourt coming off the bench. They don't lose anything defensively even down to the 9th and 10th men (Theis and Ojeleye). Theis is outstanding on that end.

4) Versatility. Because almost everyone in their rotation can guard multiple positions, they don't get hurt by switches and the opponent gets few if any mismatches. Their versatility on defense is abnormally good.

5) They've gone from 27th in defensive rebounding% last season to 2nd this year. That means they no longer give up second chance points.


They're longer, stronger, taller, more athletic, deeper and much more versatile on D than last season. They may slip a bit on that end as time goes on, but it won't be by much. It's not a mirage.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,876
And1: 10,477
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: RE: Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#545 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:24 pm

Illmatic12 wrote:
J-Ves wrote:I havn't seen a minute of Celtics basketball this year, how are thy so good on defense?

From what I've seen, Horford has been Boston's best player season.

He's not a voracious rim protector or rebounder, but he does everything else you want from a modern 5. Very mobile and great anticipation on defense. He has a really impressive IQ on that end and works perfectly in concert with their switching defensive wings.

Their wings are tremendously underrated.

Compare Jaylen Brown and Tatum to Beal and Porter. Which is better in defensive transition? Rebounding? Contesting shots?

Consider that Beal and Porter are both max players. Brown and Tatum or something like 22 and 20 years old.



Sent from my Moto G (4) using RealGM mobile app
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
Illmatic12
RealGM
Posts: 10,161
And1: 8,459
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: RE: Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#546 » by Illmatic12 » Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:47 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
Illmatic12 wrote:
J-Ves wrote:I havn't seen a minute of Celtics basketball this year, how are thy so good on defense?

From what I've seen, Horford has been Boston's best player season.

He's not a voracious rim protector or rebounder, but he does everything else you want from a modern 5. Very mobile and great anticipation on defense. He has a really impressive IQ on that end and works perfectly in concert with their switching defensive wings.

Their wings are tremendously underrated.

Compare Jaylen Brown and Tatum to Beal and Porter. Which is better in defensive transition? Rebounding? Contesting shots?

Consider that Beal and Porter are both max players. Brown and Tatum or something like 22 and 20 years old.



Sent from my Moto G (4) using RealGM mobile app

Porter is one of the top rated defenders in the league this season. +1.67 in DRPM

https://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/DRPM/position/5

Brown and Tatum have a long way to go before they measure up to Beal and Porter as all-around players. But they’re definitely playing better than many expected so far, which I think is a credit to the coaching
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,681
And1: 5,265
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#547 » by tontoz » Fri Nov 17, 2017 3:14 pm

Horford would have been a great fit here. :cry:
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,501
And1: 2,787
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#548 » by Kanyewest » Fri Nov 17, 2017 3:55 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
closg00 wrote:Wow, the Celts pulled it off, they are no joke. I wonder if they would have had the same record with Hayward starting?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Nope.

They are so much better without Hayward. They are quicker defensively and they are bigger starting Brown and Tatum at the wings and Morris at the four.

Hayward would have made them more of an ISO team and they would have been ball watching and much worse defensively.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using RealGM mobile app

Given how Kyrie Irving has become a above average defender, I'm not sure. Also, the Celtics probably score over 100 points instead of 92 with Hayward in the lineup.

Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,345
And1: 7,448
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: RE: Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#549 » by FAH1223 » Fri Nov 17, 2017 4:17 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Their wings are tremendously underrated.

Compare Jaylen Brown and Tatum to Beal and Porter. Which is better in defensive transition? Rebounding? Contesting shots?

Consider that Beal and Porter are both max players. Brown and Tatum or something like 22 and 20 years old.



Brown/Tatum at their ages right now are ahead of Beal/Porter. What remains to be seen is how they play in the postseason. Beal as a 20 year old had some above average playoff performances.
Image
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,937
And1: 9,319
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#550 » by queridiculo » Fri Nov 17, 2017 4:52 pm

The Celtics are really sound in their rotations, and Jaylen Brown just cleans up as lightning quick help defender on mop up duty.

Impressive victory yesterday but two things stood out to me.

Golden State missed a lot of open looks and it felt like the refs got caught up in the atmosphere and favored the Celtics with a majority of the calls following the Warriors 17 point lead.

Brown got away with a ton of holds and pushes against Durant and in a sequence of plays those missed calls accounted for a 6-0 run for Boston alone.

Several phantom calls against Thompson that sent Irving to the line in the closing minutes as well.

Thing is, the Celtics are extremely well coached on the defensive end and they just make all the right initial reads, so if you're playing them in the halfcourt set you have to be extremely patient and resist the temptation to take quick shots.

If you keep the ball moving you'll get your mismatches and breakdowns, but you have to play on your terms and be patient.

Also, with their offense being as poor as it is there are opportunities to get into transition as long as you clean up on your own board.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,575
And1: 23,049
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#551 » by nate33 » Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:58 pm

tontoz wrote:Horford would have been a great fit here. :cry:

Yup. A GREAT fit. Imagine our exact same roster with Horford replacing Mahinmi+Smith. Oh yeah, and we wouldn't have sacrificed our 1st round pick to dump Nicholson.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,575
And1: 23,049
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#552 » by nate33 » Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:00 pm

queridiculo wrote:The Celtics are really sound in their rotations, and Jaylen Brown just cleans up as lightning quick help defender on mop up duty.

Impressive victory yesterday but two things stood out to me.

Golden State missed a lot of open looks and it felt like the refs got caught up in the atmosphere and favored the Celtics with a majority of the calls following the Warriors 17 point lead.

Brown got away with a ton of holds and pushes against Durant and in a sequence of plays those missed calls accounted for a 6-0 run for Boston alone.

Several phantom calls against Thompson that sent Irving to the line in the closing minutes as well.

Thing is, the Celtics are extremely well coached on the defensive end and they just make all the right initial reads, so if you're playing them in the halfcourt set you have to be extremely patient and resist the temptation to take quick shots.

If you keep the ball moving you'll get your mismatches and breakdowns, but you have to play on your terms and be patient.

Also, with their offense being as poor as it is there are opportunities to get into transition as long as you clean up on your own board.

Yup. Boston grabs and holds to the maximum extent possible to force the refs to blow the whistle. Over time, the refs get tired of calling those fouls and you end up with a slug fest, which plays into Boston's hands.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,885
And1: 3,659
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#553 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:32 pm

closg00 wrote:Wow, the Celts pulled it off, they are no joke. I wonder if they would have had the same record with Hayward starting?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


I honestly think they are better without him.

Their athleticism and length is scary.
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,681
And1: 5,265
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#554 » by tontoz » Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:25 am

nate33 wrote:
queridiculo wrote:The Celtics are really sound in their rotations, and Jaylen Brown just cleans up as lightning quick help defender on mop up duty.

Impressive victory yesterday but two things stood out to me.

Golden State missed a lot of open looks and it felt like the refs got caught up in the atmosphere and favored the Celtics with a majority of the calls following the Warriors 17 point lead.

Brown got away with a ton of holds and pushes against Durant and in a sequence of plays those missed calls accounted for a 6-0 run for Boston alone.

Several phantom calls against Thompson that sent Irving to the line in the closing minutes as well.

Thing is, the Celtics are extremely well coached on the defensive end and they just make all the right initial reads, so if you're playing them in the halfcourt set you have to be extremely patient and resist the temptation to take quick shots.

If you keep the ball moving you'll get your mismatches and breakdowns, but you have to play on your terms and be patient.

Also, with their offense being as poor as it is there are opportunities to get into transition as long as you clean up on your own board.

Yup. Boston grabs and holds to the maximum extent possible to force the refs to blow the whistle. Over time, the refs get tired of calling those fouls and you end up with a slug fest, which plays into Boston's hands.


That is exactly what the Knicks used to do when Ewing was there.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,885
And1: 3,659
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#555 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:50 am

Who is this 7 ft Latvian with the butter stroke playing for the Spurs?

His shot is niiice
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,575
And1: 23,049
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#556 » by nate33 » Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:04 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
closg00 wrote:Wow, the Celts pulled it off, they are no joke. I wonder if they would have had the same record with Hayward starting?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


I honestly think they are better without him.

Their athleticism and length is scary.

Yes, it's possible that they might have lost a game if Hayward was healthy. The league is flukey like that. But in the long run, more talent is better than less talent. Hayward is extremely good and he will definitely help them. When Hayward comes back, he'll be taking minutes from Baynes and Morris, not Brown and Tatum. That's a good thing.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,345
And1: 7,448
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#557 » by FAH1223 » Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:24 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Who is this 7 ft Latvian with the butter stroke playing for the Spurs?

His shot is niiice


I was really impressed with Danny Green's defense. He CLAMPED down Westbrook.

Spurs getting all these randoms on the bench a lot of PT... they're going to be back to their 60 win selves when Kawhi is healthy... whenever that is.
Image
ClutchDJ
Senior
Posts: 547
And1: 252
Joined: Mar 14, 2016

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#558 » by ClutchDJ » Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:52 am

In other news, the Magic finally came back down to earth.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,674
And1: 4,548
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#559 » by closg00 » Sun Nov 19, 2017 2:40 am

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Who is this 7 ft Latvian with the butter stroke playing for the Spurs?

His shot is niiice


:lol: another Spurs draft and stash, this one from the infamous 2011 draft, 42nd pick.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: NBA Games Discussion Thread - Part 4 

Post#560 » by verbal8 » Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:01 pm

tontoz wrote:Horford would have been a great fit here. :cry:

Amazing how much of EGs incompetence could have been covered up with a Horford signing.

Or alternately if EG had set the Wizards up better, they likely would have been a more appealing destination for Horford when Durant picked GS.

Return to Washington Wizards