tontoz wrote:DCZards wrote:tontoz wrote:
The Bulls are a smart, disciplined team. The Wizards are neither. That gives them a pretty big advantage.
It boils down to 3 point shooting. the Wizards have a lot of guys who can make 3s. Their only hope is for hot 3 point shooting.
Bulls might be more disciplined (which comes down to better coaching) but I don't think they are smarter. Ariza, Gortat, Nene, A. Miller and Harrington are all very smart ballers, and Wall, while inexperienced, has a rapidly improving bball IQ. So I don't think the Bulls have an advantage there.
And, yes, if the Zards make their three-pointers they can make it very interesting and competitive..and avoid having to depending on scoring against that very tough Chicago interior D.
The Wizards lead the league in long 2 point attempts and are 25th in foul shot attempts. That is dumb basketball.
Their late game execution is suspect to say the least. Wall turns it over too much and frequently tries to be a hero instead of being patient and managing the clock.
So you pretty much base your entire decision on how smart (or dumb) a team is on how many long two-pointers they take. Interesting. Some people might take into account how many assists they get. But to each his own.
BTW, how many of those long 2 pointers you refer to were taken by the guys I named--Miller, Nene, Ariza, Harrington or Gortat? I'll answer that for you. Not many.
And, yes, Wall has his flaws--but he's getting smarter as he gains experience.
Edit to Add: Here are the players with turnover #s similar to Wall---Durant, Leborn James, Harden, Curry and Westbrook. Not bad company, huh?