miller31time wrote:fishercob wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/DraftExpress/status/589169246455869440[/tweet]
So what's going to happen? Are players going to get much more lucrative contracts or are big markets going to be able to build super teams more easily? Or both? I guess they aren't really mutually exclusive possibilities.
I think you're gonna see guys like Monroe probably sign 1 year deals. I get the long term security but why settle for 10-11 mil a year, when you can get 15-16 mil and not be a hindrance on the team's cap situation?
And for those that are wondering, Wiz currently have $70.2 mil tied up in salary next season, and as of now they only have $38.1 mil in salary for the 2016 offseason (Wall, Gortat, Porter's option and Humphries).
Just some things to consider for 2015 and beyond:
1. What to do with Martell? He has to play in 180 games games beginning with last season, current season and next year. He's at 110 if you don't include playoff games. If he plays in 180 or more games, his last year becomes fully guaranteed. Otherwise, they can trade him, use the stretch provision which means whatever his guarantee is left ($8.1), it can be stretched over the final 2 years or they can cut him and just be on the books for the $2.5. I highly doubt Webster will play 70 games next season.
2. Beal's contract, he hasn't shown anything that puts him on the Klay Thompson tier. Unless he makes the jump next season, I don't see why he should get more than $60 mil over 4 years. It's going to be interesting, he's our best trade chip and could legitimately land a guy like Cousins if the deal is right. I think you have to ask around and see what you can get for him. Trading him gets them an out on having to pay him.
3. What to do with the roster next season? If Pierce is back, they pretty much have their top 9 players returning: Wall/Sessions, Beal/Webster, Pierce/Porter, Nene/Humphries and Gortat. Add Blair and you're already at 10. Add a draft pick, you're at 11 and they usually don't care more than 12-13 players. Hard for me to see them using the MLE, especially when they have MLE sized contracts in Pierce, Webster, Hump. So in a nutshell, unless Pierce opts out it's the same roster.