ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,732
And1: 9,162
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#601 » by payitforward » Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:41 pm

nate33 wrote:I'm not even sure if I like this, but I'm throwing it out there for consideration. It's a one step back for two steps forward type of move:

Washington trades:
Thomas Bryant
Davis Bertans

Houston trades:
Clint Capela
HOU 2020 1st

I don't think that Bryant and Wagner are a great pairing. Both are offensive-minded and neither are rim protectors. Trading one for a rim protector would significantly boost our defense. Capela is still very young and quite good. He'd also be a great rim runner alongside Wall. He's a bit expensive at roughly $17M a year but defense at the center position costs money. We also get another 1st round pick which will probably be in the 20-24 range.

I hate giving up Bertans because I really do think he can become a featured starter rather than just a 6th man. My real concern is somebody like Charlotte offering him $20M+ a year for him and us letting him walk for nothing.

Houston does this because Bertans' shooting would make them virtually unstoppable. Bryant fills in for Capela as a very good offensive roll man. He's not as good defensively, but Houston likes to play smallball with Tucker at the 5 in crunch time anyhow.


Very creative! Capela for Bryant would be quite a good return for someone you picked up off the waiver wire. & Bertans for a R1 pick would be quite a good return for someone you acquired for a TPE.

Now, on the numbers, Bryant's play last year was very nearly at the same level as Capela's -- though Capela's better defense no doubt makes the true difference greater than the numbers convey. Yet, Bryant is also 3+ years younger. While a different kind of player from Capela, Thomas Bryant has still has a ton of upside. Nor was Capela as good a player at 21 in his 2d season as Bryant was last year.

I'm much happier with the other half of the trade: as much as I like Bertans (& always have since he was a prospect out of Europe), considering where the team is at present, a R1 pick next year seems a more valuable asset than Bertans' Bird rights.

Perhaps we could also include IT, & they could also include Gary Clark? I like tilting the trade even more to the future w/o it costing us anything of value.
User avatar
Mojo Amok
Pro Prospect
Posts: 960
And1: 834
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#602 » by Mojo Amok » Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:51 pm

Ted pretty much said a month ago that the Wizards won't be bottom feeding for an extended period:

“We look at the world now in 10-game increments,” Leonsis said. “We’d like to see progress in those increments. Next year, we’ll have John Wall back. We’ll have a little bit of space under the salary cap. I think the NBA is very different this year than it’s been in the past, and I stick with, I think, our turnaround can be quick and fast, but we don’t have any expectations about wins and losses. It’s more about culture, identity and what players will be with us on a long-term basis.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2019/11/19/ted-leonsis-still-believes-wizards-turnaround-can-be-quick-already-sees-signs-life/

Just going with a plan to keep two max players under contract is more or less an admission of this as well. I highly doubt that there has ever been a team in the entire history of the league with two max money players who actually intended to be bad for any length of time. The lack of financial flexibility is just completely incompatible with the sorts maneuvers that leverage losing and low expectations into long term advantage.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,898
And1: 20,444
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#603 » by dckingsfan » Tue Dec 17, 2019 10:30 pm

Not sure it counts as a trade but we waived Chris Chiozza and signed Anzejs Pasecniks (C). Understandable given the issues we are having in the FC.

Tough for Chris Chiozza…
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#604 » by Ruzious » Tue Dec 17, 2019 10:50 pm

payitforward wrote:
nate33 wrote:I'm not even sure if I like this, but I'm throwing it out there for consideration. It's a one step back for two steps forward type of move:

Washington trades:
Thomas Bryant
Davis Bertans

Houston trades:
Clint Capela
HOU 2020 1st

I don't think that Bryant and Wagner are a great pairing. Both are offensive-minded and neither are rim protectors. Trading one for a rim protector would significantly boost our defense. Capela is still very young and quite good. He'd also be a great rim runner alongside Wall. He's a bit expensive at roughly $17M a year but defense at the center position costs money. We also get another 1st round pick which will probably be in the 20-24 range.

I hate giving up Bertans because I really do think he can become a featured starter rather than just a 6th man. My real concern is somebody like Charlotte offering him $20M+ a year for him and us letting him walk for nothing.

Houston does this because Bertans' shooting would make them virtually unstoppable. Bryant fills in for Capela as a very good offensive roll man. He's not as good defensively, but Houston likes to play smallball with Tucker at the 5 in crunch time anyhow.


Very creative! Capela for Bryant would be quite a good return for someone you picked up off the waiver wire. & Bertans for a R1 pick would be quite a good return for someone you acquired for a TPE.

Now, on the numbers, Bryant's play last year was very nearly at the same level as Capela's -- though Capela's better defense no doubt makes the true difference greater than the numbers convey. Yet, Bryant is also 3+ years younger. While a different kind of player from Capela, Thomas Bryant has still has a ton of upside. Nor was Capela as good a player at 21 in his 2d season as Bryant was last year.

I'm much happier with the other half of the trade: as much as I like Bertans (& always have since he was a prospect out of Europe), considering where the team is at present, a R1 pick next year seems a more valuable asset than Bertans' Bird rights.

Perhaps we could also include IT, & they could also include Gary Clark? I like tilting the trade even more to the future w/o it costing us anything of value.

I think I make that trade. As much as I like Bryant, Capela is a more proven commodity and a much better rebounder. And from what people are predicting about Bertan's next contract, Capela might be making less money than Bertans next season. And this is a good draft to get a 20-25 pick - bad for high lotto picks. Bertans is tons of fun to watch, but a cash-strapped team like the Wiz... I can't see us being able to afford him at potentially 20 mil a season. And yes, I think Tommy is a fool if he believes his own comments about money not being a problem in signing Bertans.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#605 » by Ruzious » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:05 pm

dckingsfan wrote:Not sure it counts as a trade but we waived Chris Chiozza and signed Anzejs Pasecniks (C). Understandable given the issues we are having in the FC.

Tough for Chris Chiozza…

He's a solid end of the bench player - hopefully he gets another opportunity or 3.

Washington does get the disabled player exception for Miles. https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2019/12/wizards-receive-disabled-player-exception-for-c-j-miles.html
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,732
And1: 9,162
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#606 » by payitforward » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:06 pm

Mojo Amok wrote:Ted pretty much said a month ago that the Wizards won't be bottom feeding for an extended period:

“We look at the world now in 10-game increments,” Leonsis said. “We’d like to see progress in those increments. Next year, we’ll have John Wall back. We’ll have a little bit of space under the salary cap. I think the NBA is very different this year than it’s been in the past, and I stick with, I think, our turnaround can be quick and fast, but we don’t have any expectations about wins and losses. It’s more about culture, identity and what players will be with us on a long-term basis.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2019/11/19/ted-leonsis-still-believes-wizards-turnaround-can-be-quick-already-sees-signs-life/

Just going with a plan to keep two max players under contract is more or less an admission of this as well. I highly doubt that there has ever been a team in the entire history of the league with two max money players who actually intended to be bad for any length of time. The lack of financial flexibility is just completely incompatible with the sorts maneuvers that leverage losing and low expectations into long term advantage.

Well... it does get to be like reading tea leaves! But, I actually read this completely differently from you.

Ted does seem to be talking about a "turnaround... quick and fast..." to be sure. But, "...we don't have ...expectations about wins and losses. It's more about culture, identity and what players will be with us on a long-term basis." I.e. what kinds of players.

As to teams that "actually intended to be bad for any length of time," I don't think there are any of those! No one intends that. But what you intend does not command the consequences of the situation you are in & the resources you have to change it.

How long we'll be "bad" & how bad depends mostly on things altogether outside Ted Leonsis's control. One big factor is how good John Wall is when he returns. But, however good he is, he's not taking us from the 8-17 team we are to a team that's contending to win the EC. However nice that would be....

Patience.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,898
And1: 20,444
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#607 » by dckingsfan » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:16 pm

Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Not sure it counts as a trade but we waived Chris Chiozza and signed Anzejs Pasecniks (C). Understandable given the issues we are having in the FC.

Tough for Chris Chiozza…

He's a solid end of the bench player - hopefully he gets another opportunity or 3.

Washington does get the disabled player exception for Miles. https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2019/12/wizards-receive-disabled-player-exception-for-c-j-miles.html

Use it for this?
https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/256510/Trey-Burkes-Father-Makes-Plea-On-Instagram-For-76ers-To-Trade-His-Son
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,552
And1: 1,989
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#608 » by gambitx777 » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:32 pm

Not shocked. We probably should have kept him anyway. And Mathews is playing really well. Too bad we couldn't just cut miles but we just got that DPE so that explains why we kept him. I wonder if we cut miles do we still get the exception lol
dckingsfan wrote:Not sure it counts as a trade but we waived Chris Chiozza and signed Anzejs Pasecniks (C). Understandable given the issues we are having in the FC.

Tough for Chris Chiozza…


Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,292
And1: 22,715
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#609 » by nate33 » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:39 pm

gambitx777 wrote:Not shocked. We probably should have kept him anyway. And Mathews is playing really well. Too bad we couldn't just cut miles but we just got that DPE so that explains why we kept him. I wonder if we cut miles do we still get the exception lol
dckingsfan wrote:Not sure it counts as a trade but we waived Chris Chiozza and signed Anzejs Pasecniks (C). Understandable given the issues we are having in the FC.

Tough for Chris Chiozza…


Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app

There is no need to cut Miles. We were given an extra roster spot in addition to the DPE.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,552
And1: 1,989
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#610 » by gambitx777 » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:47 pm

Yeah but I was just wondering what the rules are. Like can we use him as filler in a trade now. If we do another deal that brings back three young guys for one guy can we cut him and still keep the guy we got with the DPE. Is it like nulling the extra spot if we remove him in some way or do we still get to carry an extra man
nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:Not shocked. We probably should have kept him anyway. And Mathews is playing really well. Too bad we couldn't just cut miles but we just got that DPE so that explains why we kept him. I wonder if we cut miles do we still get the exception lol
dckingsfan wrote:Not sure it counts as a trade but we waived Chris Chiozza and signed Anzejs Pasecniks (C). Understandable given the issues we are having in the FC.

Tough for Chris Chiozza…


Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app

There is no need to cut Miles. We were given an extra roster spot in addition to the DPE.


Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,292
And1: 22,715
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#611 » by nate33 » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:50 pm

gambitx777 wrote:Yeah but I was just wondering what the rules are. Like can we use him as filler in a trade now. If we do another deal that brings back three young guys for one guy can we cut him and still keep the guy we got with the DPE. Is it like nulling the extra spot if we remove him in some way or do we still get to carry an extra man
nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:Not shocked. We probably should have kept him anyway. And Mathews is playing really well. Too bad we couldn't just cut miles but we just got that DPE so that explains why we kept him. I wonder if we cut miles do we still get the exception lol

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app

There is no need to cut Miles. We were given an extra roster spot in addition to the DPE.


Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app

Yes, he can still be traded and his salary used as cap ballast, but that's only if we don't use the DPE. If we use it, then Miles can't be traded.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,292
And1: 22,715
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#612 » by nate33 » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:51 pm

payitforward wrote:Perhaps we could also include IT, & they could also include Gary Clark? I like tilting the trade even more to the future w/o it costing us anything of value.

Sounds good to me!
User avatar
youngWizzy
Rookie
Posts: 1,159
And1: 481
Joined: Dec 20, 2016
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#613 » by youngWizzy » Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:11 am

What's the deal with guys like Anzejs Pasceniks who can't jump 6 inches. We don't have any bigs who can jump. Just a little frustrating to add to that collection.
Twitter: @youngwizzydfs
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,552
And1: 1,989
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#614 » by gambitx777 » Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:47 am

Well who else is out there right now? He's already been with the team. Knows the system and he's cheep I'm sure Chris going to get a check and get another deal with the gogos. It's not a swing for the fences type deal but he's a warm body and we have the for to go fishing with at the deadline .
youngWizzy wrote:What's the deal with guys like Anzejs Pasceniks who can't jump 6 inches. We don't have any bigs who can jump. Just a little frustrating to add to that collection.


Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app
trast66
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,331
And1: 718
Joined: Oct 20, 2017
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#615 » by trast66 » Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:35 am

Need to work Bonga into a trade, can’t just kick our first round pick in the private parts without consequences.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,898
And1: 20,444
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#616 » by dckingsfan » Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:10 pm

trast66 wrote:Need to work Bonga into a trade, can’t just kick our first round pick in the private parts without consequences.

I think I am keeping Bonga and Brown. Both have the potential to be solid defenders, ball handlers and 3 point shooters.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,732
And1: 9,162
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#617 » by payitforward » Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:26 pm

dckingsfan wrote:I think I am keeping Bonga and Brown....

I'll say! Brown is already quite good -- & only 20 years old! & Bonga looks to have quite a future.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,898
And1: 20,444
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#618 » by dckingsfan » Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:30 pm

payitforward wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I think I am keeping Bonga and Brown....

I'll say! Brown is already quite good -- & only 20 years old! & Bonga looks to have quite a future.

I think they are both only 20, right? Maybe some upside over the next two to three years?
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,732
And1: 9,162
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#619 » by payitforward » Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:45 pm

Yup -- in fact, Isaac Bonga just turned 20 in November. He's 3+ months younger than Brown.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,221
And1: 2,784
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#620 » by pcbothwel » Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:51 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
payitforward wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I think I am keeping Bonga and Brown....

I'll say! Brown is already quite good -- & only 20 years old! & Bonga looks to have quite a future.

I think they are both only 20, right? Maybe some upside over the next two to three years?


Players like Brown and Bonga are great next to Rui. They show solid creativity on offense along with length & awareness on defense. That, along with their rebounding will be allow Rui to play to his strengths.

Return to Washington Wizards