Spence wrote:I don't have a problem trading down -- from 2 to 4, for example -- as long as we don't lose Beal in the process. If we can't have Anthony, and there is an 80% chance we cannot, then Beal makes a very nice consolation prize. If some team wants to move up to take Robinson I'd have no problem trading out of 2 as long as we stay high enough to take Beal or, if necessary, MKG.
I'm firmly in the Beal camp, so would have no problem with the Wiz taking him at #2 if they had the pick.
But - I would listen to offers, only from the teams at #3 & #4, to move down if they had something of value to offer. And, it would be on the condition that I know who they are going to draft at #2, and it would have to be Drummond or Robinson.
(I'm not too worried about another GM saying he would take one guy to get the deal and then reneging - that kind of thing would be career suicide, because no one would deal with him ever again. It's like the Wiz-Bulls Hinrich trade. By the time the trade was finished, the Bulls had no real incentive to go through with it, since they had already struck out in the FA market. But if they had gone back on their word, they would have been blackballed from then on.)
If the team at #4 says they will move up to take Drummond (for example), I would make the deal with the hope of getting Beal, but the confidence of at least getting MKG. But if they're moving up to take MKG, I don't make the deal because Beal could go #3, and the Wiz are left empty-handed. (No, that's not hyperbole - I would consider it a failure if this draft results in Drummond or Robinson.)
I might even entertain taking MKG at #2, then fielding offers from any team following who is in position to take Beal. If the team at 3, 4, or even 5, really want MKG and will give up Beal + something else, it would be worth it. And the "worst case scenario" where no deal materializes means we get MKG, which isn't so bad...
But at the end of the day, I'd probably just go ahead and take Beal at #2, regardless of what the "experts" think.
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose