DCZards wrote:payitforward wrote:...The reasons to want him, OTOH, are straightforward: in his first 4 seasons, Ben Simmons has been one of the best PGs in the league, if not the absolute best, & one of the top handful of players in the league overall.
PIF, I agree with you regarding Ben’s immense talent. He’d be one of the top one or two players on pretty much any NBA team... but I do believe there is a tremendous risk in making a player who reportedly doesn’t put in the work to improve his deeply flawed game and who quits on his team because the coach and teammates hurt his feelings one of the cornerstones of your franchise.
 
Zards, what you write here is both relevant & accurate (except I don't think his game is "deeply flawed" -- more on that below). 
On the one hand, Simmons will wind up being traded for much much less than he's worth as a player. On the other hand, there's a hard-to-quantify risk associated with his future. It's hard to tell how much he cares about being an NBA player -- or even about basketball. Who knows? Maybe he'll retire early. He's already got a lot of $$. A couple of seasons more, & he'll be really rich! Maybe he won't even wait that long. In fact, people would like to claim that last season his heart wasn't in it. 
Then again, after 30 games this year, Philly was 15-15. Last year it was 20-10. & the year before Ben joined the team, the Sixers went 28-54. The very next year, his rookie year, they went 52-30. Was that turnaround all Ben Simmons? No, obviously not! Was Simmons the single biggest factor in it? You bet! He sure was. By far.
Ben Simmons doesn't have a "deeply flawed game." He has one of the best games of any player in the league -- why else would he be, as Zards points out, "one of the top one or two players on pretty much any NBA team"?
First off, let's debunk the idea that he's a problem, a lead weight, on offense. He's not a volume scorer but he scores as many points per 40 minutes as an average PG. Only... he does it at a significantly above average TS%. That's good not bad. That's an above average scorer not a "problem on offense."
Then there's the fact that he gets 70% more defensive boards than is average for a PG. & 2.5 times as many offensive boards as is average for a PG. He also averages almost 35% more assists than PG-average. He blocks 2 shots for every 1 shot a PG usually blocks, & he gets 40% more steals too. OTOH, he fouls a little more than average, & he turns the ball over more as well. 
If he didn't do those two things, he'd be the best player in the league bar none. As it is, he's in the top maybe 7-9 overall over the 4 years of his career so far. If a team is willing to take the risk of acquiring him, that's why.