ImageImageImageImageImage

GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM)

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,626
And1: 3,466
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#81 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Sat Feb 25, 2023 6:32 pm

payitforward wrote:Stop assessing players' outings based on plus/minus.
Gibson was plus 4, & he was terrible.
Beal had an awful game but was even.
Porzingis was pretty good, but he was -15.

Wright was tremendous, obviously -- he doesn't go 5-7 on 3-pointers every night, alas! :)
But, Morris didn't have a bad game (nor a really good one, admittedly).

Our offense was incredibly good last night. Unbelievably good. We took 79 shots & 12 FTAs & produced 109 points -- that's an unbelievable .647 TS%.

The Knicks beat us, because they got to take 16 more shots than we got. Plus, less importantly, they also got 4 extra trips to the line.

Those 16 extra shots & 4 extra FTAs produced only 6 extra points!
But, it was enough.
You just don't win many games where you let the opponent shoot 16 more FGAs than you.

So, if you ask why we lost, you just need to ask how we gave them those 16 extra shots -- that's your reason. Period.
You don't need to look at anything else to explain the loss

IOW, Randle's scoring didn't beat us (though of course he had a great night).

The Knicks missed 47 shots, but we managed only 31 defensive boards. They got 12 offensive rebounds. We only missed 40 shots, & we only got 3 offensive rebounds.

Simple arithmetic: that difference gave them 9 extra chances to score.

They committed 12 turnovers but had 9 steals. We had 6 steals, but we committed 17 turnovers. Do the arithmetic: the difference gave them another 9 extra chances to score.

That's it; there is no more.

The combination of Mitchell Robinson's 4 offensive boards & just 2 or 3 of the turnovers committed by any of Kuzma, Porzingis, Gafford or Beal was enough to give away the game.

Stop ragging on Wes. He's not turning the ball over, & he's not incapable of pulling down a board on the offensive end.


Did you watch the game PIF? I agree that the extra possessions were what did us in. Sometimes the ball bounces badly and the other team secures the offensive rebound. Oh well, it happens. The frustrating part is that, apart from Delon and sometimes Deni, no one with regular rotation minutes on our team ever boxes out.

And that is on the coach.
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
gambitx777
General Manager
Posts: 9,667
And1: 1,740
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#82 » by gambitx777 » Sat Feb 25, 2023 6:38 pm

bsilver wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:Can someone please explain to me why the **** they play Taj mother **** Gibson actual rotation minutes. Carry JR should be getting those or **** you can play Gafford more than 12 minutes ( not sure if he got hurt) .

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app

Carey Jr. got about 6 minutes of non-garbage time about a month ago and didn’t play well, although I thought he showed good quickness for a big man. That looks to be his one chance. WUJ prefers Gibson, and even Gill for backup centers. Maybe some other team will give Carey Jr an opportunity.
I wouldn't really care if it was say a guy like idk plumlee, another early 30 years old vet center taking minutes from the kid but my god Taj Gibson has been washed for 7 years now. Give the kid a chance.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
WallToWall
Veteran
Posts: 2,652
And1: 939
Joined: May 20, 2010
         

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#83 » by WallToWall » Sat Feb 25, 2023 7:55 pm

payitforward wrote:Stop ragging on Wes. He's not turning the ball over, & he's not incapable of pulling down a board on the offensive end.


It is WUJ's job to get the players to give effort, get players to play D, to manage rotations, to create favorable matchups, to know how to attack opposing players (not just on offense), and coach up his players accordingly. Do you think he did those things? I dont.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 67,374
And1: 19,680
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#84 » by nate33 » Sat Feb 25, 2023 8:33 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
payitforward wrote:Stop assessing players' outings based on plus/minus.
Gibson was plus 4, & he was terrible.
Beal had an awful game but was even.
Porzingis was pretty good, but he was -15.

Wright was tremendous, obviously -- he doesn't go 5-7 on 3-pointers every night, alas! :)
But, Morris didn't have a bad game (nor a really good one, admittedly).

Our offense was incredibly good last night. Unbelievably good. We took 79 shots & 12 FTAs & produced 109 points -- that's an unbelievable .647 TS%.

The Knicks beat us, because they got to take 16 more shots than we got. Plus, less importantly, they also got 4 extra trips to the line.

Those 16 extra shots & 4 extra FTAs produced only 6 extra points!
But, it was enough.
You just don't win many games where you let the opponent shoot 16 more FGAs than you.

So, if you ask why we lost, you just need to ask how we gave them those 16 extra shots -- that's your reason. Period.
You don't need to look at anything else to explain the loss

IOW, Randle's scoring didn't beat us (though of course he had a great night).

The Knicks missed 47 shots, but we managed only 31 defensive boards. They got 12 offensive rebounds. We only missed 40 shots, & we only got 3 offensive rebounds.

Simple arithmetic: that difference gave them 9 extra chances to score.

They committed 12 turnovers but had 9 steals. We had 6 steals, but we committed 17 turnovers. Do the arithmetic: the difference gave them another 9 extra chances to score.

That's it; there is no more.

The combination of Mitchell Robinson's 4 offensive boards & just 2 or 3 of the turnovers committed by any of Kuzma, Porzingis, Gafford or Beal was enough to give away the game.

Stop ragging on Wes. He's not turning the ball over, & he's not incapable of pulling down a board on the offensive end.


Did you watch the game PIF? I agree that the extra possessions were what did us in. Sometimes the ball bounces badly and the other team secures the offensive rebound. Oh well, it happens. The frustrating part is that, apart from Delon and sometimes Deni, no one with regular rotation minutes on our team ever boxes out.

And that is on the coach.

The Wizards are the 13th best team in the league on the defensive glass.
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,662
And1: 2,968
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#85 » by Frichuela » Sat Feb 25, 2023 10:54 pm

WallToWall wrote:
payitforward wrote:Stop ragging on Wes. He's not turning the ball over, & he's not incapable of pulling down a board on the offensive end.


It is WUJ's job to get the players to give effort, get players to play D, to manage rotations, to create favorable matchups, to know how to attack opposing players (not just on offense), and coach up his players accordingly. Do you think he did those things? I dont.


Agreed. Wes was throughly out-coached by Thibs. Did you see how quick the latter was calling time outs? Wes on the other hand tends to fall asleep at the wheel…
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,662
And1: 2,968
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#86 » by Frichuela » Sat Feb 25, 2023 10:57 pm

As usual we don’t get the respect from the refs…so Wizards…

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=3c3tAy77uTB9OAtwH8nKow
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 67,374
And1: 19,680
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#87 » by nate33 » Sat Feb 25, 2023 10:59 pm

Frichuela wrote:As usual we don’t get the respect from the refs…so Wizards…

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=3c3tAy77uTB9OAtwH8nKow

It was an absolutely crucial play. Deni D'd him up perfectly, and then he switched pivot feet and made the layup.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 23,623
And1: 7,206
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#88 » by Dat2U » Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:19 pm

The ceiling for this team is probably just enough to lose our 1st round pick to the Knicks. How sad.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 15,901
And1: 7,004
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#89 » by FAH1223 » Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:24 pm

Dat2U wrote:The ceiling for this team is probably just enough to lose our 1st round pick to the Knicks. How sad.

Don’t look now but the Raptors are ahead of the Wiz

Tomorrow’s game against the Bulls is CRITICAL
Image
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 23,623
And1: 7,206
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#90 » by Dat2U » Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:26 pm

CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:
DANNYLANDOVER wrote:Kuzma shooting us out of games with Porzingis and Beal playing 0 defense equals a big fat L.

Aside, as good as Porzingis has been on offense at the 4, in this big lineup, he's been almost as bad on D. We give up way too many paint points and offensive rebounds with him in the game.


I've been saying this about his defense, and have been ignored. He is not able to play defense consistently at the four and has been getting cooked often. He's just not fast enough there, he gets blown by way to often, finds himself out of position. HE played much better at the 5 on defense. Gafford is a great asset off the bench, everyone just made it about him having to start after a few good games. Gafford was also pretty bad to start the season, there's no reason for him to need to start, he can be really effective off the bench.

Deni should comeback to the starting lineup. We don't really lose a whole lot of size with that move, and put Porzingis in a position he is much better at on defense.


The big lineup is fools good. Give credit to WUJ tho. Yes, give him credit for recognizing it works against certain lineups (i.e. bad teams) but playing TWO drop bigs together means getting ABSOLUTELY torched against teams with skilled high usage bigs like Randle or AD. And it would certaintly become a death knell in post season play.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 23,623
And1: 7,206
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#91 » by Dat2U » Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:33 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:The ceiling for this team is probably just enough to lose our 1st round pick to the Knicks. How sad.

Don’t look now but the Raptors are ahead of the Wiz

Tomorrow’s game against the Bulls is CRITICAL


Bulls are out Wizzing the Wiz which is really hard. The biggest reason so is missing Lonzo and Nikola Vucevic is the best 3rd option they can muster. Only saving factor is Bulls pick may convey if its not top 5 and Bulls not getting in top 4 no matter what so they might as well try to win. Need a big nights from DeRozan & LaVine to pull it out.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 30,428
And1: 16,192
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#92 » by dckingsfan » Sun Feb 26, 2023 12:19 am

Dat2U wrote:
CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:
DANNYLANDOVER wrote:Kuzma shooting us out of games with Porzingis and Beal playing 0 defense equals a big fat L.

Aside, as good as Porzingis has been on offense at the 4, in this big lineup, he's been almost as bad on D. We give up way too many paint points and offensive rebounds with him in the game.

I've been saying this about his defense, and have been ignored. He is not able to play defense consistently at the four and has been getting cooked often. He's just not fast enough there, he gets blown by way to often, finds himself out of position. HE played much better at the 5 on defense. Gafford is a great asset off the bench, everyone just made it about him having to start after a few good games. Gafford was also pretty bad to start the season, there's no reason for him to need to start, he can be really effective off the bench.

Deni should comeback to the starting lineup. We don't really lose a whole lot of size with that move, and put Porzingis in a position he is much better at on defense.

The big lineup is fools good. Give credit to WUJ tho. Yes, give him credit for recognizing it works against certain lineups (i.e. bad teams) but playing TWO drop bigs together means getting ABSOLUTELY torched against teams with skilled high usage bigs like Randle or AD. And it would certaintly become a death knell in post season play.

The problem is that the small lineup is also fools gold with Kuz at PF. And you get lots of mismatches when Porzingis is on (when he is not, it doesn't matter if you go big or small). Double edge sword there...
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,626
And1: 3,466
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#93 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Sun Feb 26, 2023 5:10 am

nate33 wrote:
Frichuela wrote:As usual we don’t get the respect from the refs…so Wizards…

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=3c3tAy77uTB9OAtwH8nKow

It was an absolutely crucial play. Deni D'd him up perfectly, and then he switched pivot feet and made the layup.


I can’t recall. Did we have a challenge left at the time?
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 67,374
And1: 19,680
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: GT #59: Knicks @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/980 AM) 

Post#94 » by nate33 » Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:36 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Frichuela wrote:As usual we don’t get the respect from the refs…so Wizards…

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=3c3tAy77uTB9OAtwH8nKow

It was an absolutely crucial play. Deni D'd him up perfectly, and then he switched pivot feet and made the layup.


I can’t recall. Did we have a challenge left at the time?

I don't think you can challenge the absence of a travel call.

Return to Washington Wizards