closg00 wrote:hands11 wrote:
Wrong again Closg. I was talking about before EG was here. Mostly the worst of what I was talking about involved Abe and Wes combo with Wes either the HC or the GM. Lets take a walk down memory lane.
If it may please the board, I would like to introduce into evidence, the defendant (Hands11), own words with-respect to the timeframe he referred-to when he wrote that the Wizards had been "mismanaged for so long". The evidence will show that the defendants comments regarding Wizards "mismanagement" were limited exclusively to those transactions that occurred under Wizards General Manager Ernest Gruneld (aka Easy Ernie)
The recent claim by the defendant that "I was talking about before EG was here" are demonstrably false and and easily disproved.
If I may, I would like to introduce the defendants comments in their entirety.
hands11 wrote:I remember not liking the L8ner trade either. Felt they should have kept him that year but know they weren't going to because I knew Abe's MO. 2000 was the blow up year. Abe wasn't going to wait it out to do it right. Can't remember all the details of it now. I think they were still having cap issues and L8 was having injury problems. I think it was his back. I wanted them to keep him until his contract expired. Lose another year if need be. But they wanted Stackhouse gone. He had worn out his welcome.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/WAS/2004.htmlL8 5.6M & Stack 6.9M plus the 5th pick for AJ 12.5M and
cash.
They went from 25 wins to 45 wins. So it looked like a good move to the average fan, but it seemed like they were jumping the gun to me. AJ was not ideal. Not a PF because of his D and not a SF either. But a great 6th man on a good team. i.e. Dallas. Felt the AJ addition was a really bad move. More Abe quick fix. Should have road it out and kept the pick. But hey, he was a Wiz so I hoped it worked out. He was fun to watch on offense. Seemed likable and mature. But it was never ideal. Flawed design when you can't play D at PF. At 6M off the bench, he would have been awesome. But he never saw himself as that. That was also part of the problem. My target was someone like K Mart.
Then the following year they got CB for Kwame and picked Dray in the 2nd. 42 wins. Sweet Jesus. WOW.
- but they lost Blake which I felt was a mistake. Felt he would be a solid back PG for years if given minutes.
- still had the Etan problem 5.3M, plus Hayes and that knee 2M, and they added Daniels 5M, 5yrs 30M
- I liked AD, but could have kept Blake cheaper and built slower. They have been mismanage for so long, that was the time to start building slower.
Bad moves based on Abe's win now framework. Time after time he repeated this same mistake. Just when things would start looking better, he jumped to soon. When stings were stall, he drug it out to long patching it up instead of fixing it. Should have kept L8, the 5th pick, and Blake and had the cap room instead of AJ and AD. Same thing that lead to them trading the 5th pick in 2009. Flawed plan from the owner. Abe was very predictable that way.
Could have been a different rebuild if they didn't jump so soon and had a long time horizon such that they reloaded after making the playoffs or stuck it out another year with L8 before getting there.
I trust Ted's at the helm a lot better.
ZERO references to any transactions that took place BEFORE the hiring of Ernest Grunfeld. None. The state rests it's case.
The state requests that the defendant Hands11, be banned from the Wiz Board for eternity. In-lieu of lifetime banishment, The state would recommend that the defendant be condemned to post comments no-longer than one sentence in-length, for 10 years.
Thank you
LOL.. Pretty weak lawyering Clogs. No hard feeling though. Its been fun passing the time while nothing else was going on. But, lets set the record straight before we move on.
I am not defiant. Your the one that started this. I just failed to back down when you kept running away from reality. And all this was because you didn't like me bringing Abe up and because you seem to have an odd definition of what " for so long" translates to in years. Clearly, it isn't 2 years. Unless we are doing dog years.
I posted my view on some past moves which was the topic at the time. It started with L8ner, and in there..like you just quoted above..I said this..
Then the following year they got CB for Kwame and picked Dray in the 2nd. 42 wins. Sweet Jesus. WOW.
- but they lost Blake which I felt was a mistake. Felt he would be a solid back PG for years if given minutes.
- still had the Etan problem 5.3M, plus Hayes and that knee 2M, and they added Daniels 5M, 5yrs 30M
-
I liked AD, but could have kept Blake cheaper and built slower. They have been mismanage for so long, that was the time to start building slower.
My reference to them being mismanaged was in the section I was talking about them letting Blake go. I said, "They have been mismanaged for
so long, that was the time to start building slower" Yes, EG was GM when they let Blake go. And no, I didn't like the move. That happened with in the two years EG had been there. That is not the "for so long" I was referring to.
Now, I don't know what you think "for so long" is but I don't think most would say 2 years qualifies.
Now, so far, all I did was post my view about past moves. I took no shot at you. You are the one that decided to chime in by replying to my post with something about what a GM is and isn't and how the owner has nothing to do with it. To which I clarified my take on how it works, since you misrepresented my view.
To which you asked a question...
"This should be good. Who was mismanaging the team for
so long Hands? "
With a big smiley no less.
Honestly, at this point I was confused why you ended it with a smiley and why you wanted to take me on over my "for so long" statement. The answer to for "so long" was obvious. Being confused, I asked what you meant because the answer was so clear. EG had only been there 2 years. You came back with some condescending smerky reply like you got me on something. What ? That you think 2 years is a long time and I don't ? Dude, your tone never made any sense to me and it still doesn't.
So I asked ...
"You asking who was in the front office before EG was there ? " Yeah, I include an eye roll because your post made no sense to me nor did your " this should be good" statement.
Then you continue to go off the reservation like you have some kind of point to make. Even more baffling. You even claim some kind of victory.. So I'm defiant because I wasn't standing still for that. Which honestly, I have no idea why you started. Go back an read.
Again, this is what I wrote. You even keep referencing it.
-
I liked AD, but could have kept Blake cheaper and built slower. They have been mismanage for so long, that was the time to start building slower.
But what the hell. Nothing else to write about so I did a walk down memory lane and specifically detailed exactly what I was talking about when I said for so long. Even pulled up NBA reference and warmed up my memory of the hell I watch this team go through.
And with all that in hand, instead of realizing you made a mistake and just saying, oh, I misread what you wrote, sorry for being a db, you go even further off the reservation by actually quoting your mistake and trying to make some law suit out of it. Even suggesting I be banned. lol..
Two years is not "for so long" Closg. I was talking about the previous 15-20 whatever years and I detailed it. And in there, I pointed out what small parts I liked. Not only would almost every person on the planet agree two years is not a long time. I was the one who wrote it. You asked me what I meant. I answered you.
The fact you don't see what happened here is honestly baffling. I have no idea why you wanted to make this an issue or what's going on in your personal life. I have no idea why you wouldn't let it go even when presented with the answer you asked for that was obvious the entire time.
So let me get this straight. I make a harmless post. You reply to it taking me on. I answer your question. You come back in some cocky smerky way. I answer again by asking you what your talking about and defining the period I was. You further try to take me on over something totally stupid. To which I further explain something that should have never needed explained... And I'm defiant and should be banned for eternity ?
Hey, just so you know. I'm smiling over here. I found this entire exchange to be kind of funny. Baffling, yes but funny because it was so strange. Such are the dog days of summer when there is little to talk about.
But now we have some real Wizards stuff to talk about again. Ves is playing and Mini Camp should start soon. First day of football. Wiz Camp will be here before we know it. And the season ahead should be fun to watch.
Honestly Clogs, I don't hold a grudge so I'm ready to move on. I would rather talk about the Wizards. That's my team. I'm a fan. So are you guys. That's why we are hear. That's what I would rather do.
Enjoy your evening. I mean that.