Pitbull wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:The only thing that I think will happen on draft night is Washington will probably misuse the 46th pick. They're either going to draft a European player who will never set foot in the NBA or they will sell the pick. I do not expect the player at 46 will make the team.
I don't think they'll be able to trade for picks or to buy a round one draft pick.
My man, my mellow... It's the 46th pick! Easy with the negativity! I mean, I know we've all been beaten down by draft ineptitude on picks outside of the lottery (and sometimes IN the lottery), but c'mon, CCJ... The probability of success even by the best of drafters places the outcome of the pick at 55% deep bench, 25% 8th/9th man, 15% 6th man, 5% starter.
I lobbied for drafting Millsap about a year and a half. (I even said he was worth a lottery pick). He went 47th. I knew Blair would be good, but Ernie passed him by in round two. By the time Faried came along I didn't have to convince this board. Many wanted him. Ernie wanted Vesely and Singleton. Last season, I really wanted Nate Wolters. Someone with Washington did, too. They drafted him ... and traded him. Check Milwaukee's on/off differential with Wolters playing. He's been a good defender, too. (Edited: DRtg 114 would say otherwise)
The Wizards have drafted dumb guys, "potential" guys (long athletes who lack skill/basketball IQ), questionable character guys, and they usually pass on obvious high skilled, finished players.
Washington should have kept Wolters. They are not astute enough to pick an obvious dynamic combo guard, Deonte Burton. Too obviously a good fit. Ernie won't draft Cameron Bairstow. Too mature. Too bulky.
No, Ernie will draft a project or someone who got kicked off a team or someone intellectually challenged.
(Otto Porter seems like a quality kid, and so does Beal. Booker has done well and was the exception, a mature, finished player ready to compete and contribute).
Sent from my SGH-M919 using RealGM Forums mobile app