dckingsfan wrote:hege53190 wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Expiring contracts for next year are: Okafor, Ariza, Seraphin, Booker, Temple
Team options are: Vesely and Singleton (Beal, but that will be picked up)
That leaves us with a tremendous amount of flexibility... rather have the flexibility than a net negative PER
http://www.82games.com/1213/12MIL11.HTM
Especially given Okafor could walk leaving us without a C.
I don't know what exact number you are looking at. but the one I see is the bucks had a net -.1 point differential with him on the court and a net negative 3.4 point differential per game with him off the court. That gives him a positive 3.3 point differential per game.
I was looking at NET PER against other PFs... I think the negative 3.4 has more to do with Udoh and Ayon. Either way, he wasn't a + point differential. Better than our other PFs, yes. Worth the cap flexibility and pick, no.
Just an opinion of course
Just looking at that stat for the Bucks and I thought it was junk. Then I looked for other teams and it passed the smell test. I don't know what to say. I am blown away.
Somehow Ellis is one of the best players in the league at preventing PER against opposing players which is ridiculous to me because he seems terrible defensively, Brandon Jennings is a net neutral PER per game but the Bucks are 12 points better per game when Jennings is off the floor. Sanders who seems great defensively and MIT has said as much gives up a ridiculous 18.4 PER. Henson who seems well above average defensively gives up a terrible 18.9 PER Ersan who seems average defensively gives up an atrocious 20.9 PER. There just seems to be a terrible disconnect between what I watched and what those stats say.





















