ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,202
And1: 24,502
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#861 » by Pointgod » Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:31 pm

Zonkerbl wrote:
popper wrote:Now I get it.


I Understand Why They Knelt
by DAVID FRENCH September 25, 2017 12:03 PM @DAVIDAFRENCH


……He told his political opponents on the football field — men who have defined their lives and careers by their mental and physical toughness — to essentially, “Do what I say or lose your job.” In so doing, he put them in straits far more difficult to navigate than anything Colin Kaepernick has wrought: Stand and they are seen to obey a man who just abused his office, and millions of Americans will view them as a sellout not just to the political cause they love but also to the Constitution itself; kneel and they defy a rogue president, but millions of Americans will view them as disrespecting the nation itself to score political points against a president those Americans happen to like.

At one stroke, thanks to an attempted vulgar display of strength, Trump changed the playing of the anthem and the display of the flag from a moment where all but the most radical Americans could unite to one where millions of well-meaning Americans could and did legitimately believe that the decision to kneel represented a defense of the ideals of the flag, not defiance of the nation they love……

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/451697/donald-trump-nfl-protests-why-they-knelt


Here's something in addition I learned today:

How it all started, and how we got here.
Did you know this?
Aug 14, 2016- Colin Kaepernick sits for the national anthem.....and no one noticed.
Aug 20th, 2016- Colin again sits, and again, no one noticed.
Aug 26th, 2016- Colin sits and this time he is met with a level of vitriol unseen against an athlete. Even the future President of the United States took shots at him while on the campaign trail. Colin went on to explain his protest had NOTHING to with the military, but he felt it hard to stand for a flag that didn't treat people of color fairly.
Then on on Aug 30th, 2016 Nate Boyer, a former Army Green Beret turned NFL long snapper, penned an open letter to Colin in the Army Times. In it he expressed how Colin's sitting affected him.
Then a strange thing happened. Colin was able to do what most Americans to date have not...
He listened.
In his letter, Mr. Boyer writes:
"I’m not judging you for standing up for what you believe in. It’s your inalienable right. What you are doing takes a lot of courage, and I’d be lying if I said I knew what it was like to walk around in your shoes. I’ve never had to deal with prejudice because of the color of my skin, and for me to say I can relate to what you’ve gone through is as ignorant as someone who’s never been in a combat zone telling me they understand what it’s like to go to war.
Even though my initial reaction to your protest was one of anger, I’m trying to listen to what you’re saying and why you’re doing it."
Mr. Boyer goes on to write "There are already plenty people fighting fire with fire, and it’s just not helping anyone or anything. So I’m just going to keep listening, with an open mind. I look forward to the day you're inspired to once again stand during our national anthem. I'll be standing right there next to you."
Empathy and understanding was shown by Mr. Boyer.........and Mr. Kaepernick reciprocated.
Colin invited Nate to San Diego where the two had a 90 minute discussion and Nate proposed Colin kneel instead of sit.
But why kneel? In a military funeral, after the flag is taken off the casket of the fallen military member, it is smartly folded 13 times and then presented to the parents, spouse or child of the fallen member by a fellow service member while KNEELING. The two decided that kneeling for the flag would symbolize his reverence for those that paid the ultimate sacrifice while still allowing Colin to peacefully protest the injustices he saw.
Empathy, not zealotry under the guise of patriotism, is the only way meaningful discussion can be had. Mr. Kaepernick listened to all of you that say he disrespects the military and extended an olive branch to find a peace.
When will America listen to him?
Thanks Mudge Rudiger.
We can all learn from this backstory. The truth often lies in the middle. Seek to learn the opposing side's point.
(Info from NYT)


The people that this message really needs to get across to simply don't care. The very fact that Kaepernick has the audacity to speak out about racism chaps their ass. Colin has clearly explained his position, he's donated money, he's volunteered, he's sacrificed his career. At some point the burden of solving racial inequality can't be solely placed on the backs of black people.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,829
And1: 9,217
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#862 » by payitforward » Thu Sep 28, 2017 12:32 am

stilldropin20 wrote:let me quickly say this as a quick thought in regard to police brutality.

i recently lived in the Beverly neighborhood of chicago and grew up in pullman. Both are surrounded by chicago's toughest and most dangerous neighborhoods. Blocks away!! And one of my dental practices is on the southside near both. These are south side chicago neighborhoods. The north end of beverly is like 8 blocks away from the south end of west englewood. Englewood is where a lot of the shootings and murder occur in chicago. Obama's neighborhood (hyde park) is directly to the northeast is to the East of englewood. Beverly itself is safe. very safe. great schools. All the "higher up" police and firefighter live there. As well as city judges and officials. Same for Hyde Park. So people "with money" live right next to englewood. yet we have virtually no crime. and kids are killing each other blocks away?? How does this happen!? In practically Obama's back yard!!?? No seriosuly, literally his back yard.

At my office, I accept the city of chicago and state of illinois medical and dental insurance so I see about 4,000 police officers and their families. 90% or more of which are african american. And we talk about these issues every day. they mostly talk i listen. and I get involved and help where I can-which is often. this is my neighborhood, my home, my friends, and what I consider my people, despite differences in race. I grew up here.

For starters, the police officers all nearly all support trump. to a man. to a wife. They dont like his optics just like I dont. But they believe in law and order. And when we have a problem, we call the police and ask them to put their lives on the line for us. Let me say that again: They put their lives on the line for the rest of us and they nearly all support trump. Again, high 90 percentile are african american. In fact, only one police officer opposes trump at my office-and he is white!!! out of nearly 4,000!!! Its not a small sample. And these guys ahve been around. 30 years or more on the force. Have worked the mayors detail and even the presidents detail. for years. not just the rank and file here. This is beverly I'm talking about.

In a nut shell, here's what they tell me about chicago's murder problem and how it relates to "police brutality."

1. In the 1990's there was a case where a police officer was within her(female) right to protect herself while responding to a "shots fired" call. but was thrown under the bus by a far left DA trying to make a political career for himself (wont mention any names here)-but yeah, he's a politician now. go figure. CPD (and therefore the city)had a large payout. and mayor Daley had enough. he threw his hands up and said(in so many words), "if you dont want us to police, we wont police." That message worked its way down the line to the officer on the street. basically, the overall message to police officers (in chicago) is that we dont want police (to police) anymore. we want referees. Dont touch. dont impede cuz that requires touching. dont really get involved. and definitely dont arrest cuz again they might include some uncomfortable touching.

So the police officers just dont "take the calls." or they dont "arrive quickly" while the perpetrators on are still at the scene. and why on earth would they? they are not allowed to protect themselves when they arrive on scene. not really allowed to arrest. not really allowed to find the "bad guys." again, these are african american police officers responding to calls in african american neighborhoods. Not only is their life at major risk but if they manage to survive a shift with their life, a massive amount of paperwork remains if they engage the public. This paperwork and their careers are now under tremendous scrutiny. They can get fired at any point. Or completely embarrassed. Video's are edited to tell a story supporting a narrative instead of telling the truth.

so the perpetrators on the streets understand that they kind of have free reign. and they are fighting over drug turf with each other. we got kids(11-16 years old) on the streets fighting over $50 per day drug turf. as I said multiple times. We are literally fighting over "scraps." an din englewood, chicago, killing each other over it. While large "corporate" international Drug cartels are raking in hundreds of millions, though. its a travesty. We can't police it on out streets. and our "corporate owned ruling class controlled" politicians wont stop the drugs from coming in the country...even though we declared "war" in drugs in the 80's. Which gave congress full use of the military to fight international drug traffickers. Why cant out military stop this? combined with the DEA, et al? Dont forget, I'm former Navy. and held a TS SI SCI clearence. the answer here is we can easily stop the drugs, but it is expensive.

So there is a flip side here to this issue of police brutality.

and once again it ignored the real issue.

The real issue is that institutional slavery and then racism destroyed the african american family in a lot of inner cities. remember way back when 2 pages ago when i said 2 things matter? tAgain, hose 2 things are generational wealth and generational knowledge. Slavery and racism has robbed the african american community from a lot of their generational knowledge that gets passed down from gen. to gen. the kind of knowledge a father and mother learns from their father and mother and passes on. not some spun up narrative on TV to make you think and feel a certain way. The kind of knowledge that helps you not only survive but thrive. And thats the real issue. that is where we need to start. Thats what the US government and all us need to repair and rebuild. rebuild the african american family and the community. Provide real opportunity, security, let the imagination grow. teach self love, self respect. so that we can all love and respect each other. thats how we fix relationships with the police. Not by taking away the police's ability to "police."

when a police officer leaves his/her house for work. he/she has one job first and forement. and that is to come home to his/her wife and children to provide the security and generational knowledge to his/her own children. we must understand the mind of the police officer.

now i'm not talking about nor addressing any bad apple racists jackass cops that make up less than .01% of any given police force that makes the other 99.99% look really bad. Those jerks can rot in jail and then be killed in a barbaric way.

Here's a question: you far-left-liberals dont think these african american police officers dont want to get these kids off of a life of crime???? Make their own streets safer? help these kids that live 4 blocks away or on the same damn block sometimes? help them to a better life? These police officers grew up on these city blocks. Just like I did.

let me assure you that they are heart broken over this. Like me, they dont like supporting donald effin trump, even just the optics of if it. But they understand that law and order is a necessary beginning to fix and repair our poorest communities. and they need a guy that supports them. we might know more about this than what you've been misinformed by CNN to know.

And these police officers on the streets of englewood and the wild 100's know far more about these complex issues than Colin kaepernick will ever know.

You seem to be a nice guy in a lot of ways, & I think your heart is in the right place. & of course there is a place for your experience & for your expression of what you think it means.

But to be honest you don't seem to know a single thing outside the inevitably narrow circle of what you've experienced. As well, you seem either incapable of, or (more likely) uninterested in, doing the investigation and reading and more that would be required to put yourself in a position to say something that takes what you experience and contextualizes it, along with other facts & other people's experience, in a way that would makes it cogent or even useful.

For that reason, even when you point out an obvious truth (e.g. your observation on "slavery & institutional racism") you can't marshall it to contribute to any logical or otherwise sensible argument. Instead, you just yell one contradictory thing after another -- a great example would be your saying on the one hand that you support Trump, we need someone like him, & on the other hand proposing that we enact stringent taxes on the rich. Do you think that's what Trump wants or intends to do? Obviously not.

That's just a single example, one that jumps to mind, out of dozens -- they fill your posts. Alas, they make it impossible to take what you write seriously.

&, of course, they simply make you look like a dope when you write with utter certainty about matters of which you know nothing at all -- e.g. what Colin Kaepernick does or doesn't understand about racism or the black experience. If you want to read someone who knows what to do with his lack of understanding, just read the long piece a teammate wrote Kaepernick, the one Zonk quotes.

Finally, everyone here has the right to their opinion & to express it. But, man, you have really been going on. Dominating the proceedings. It's not my place to tell you to back off, but I will say that it would be a relief.
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#863 » by cammac » Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:16 am

I'm white and the closest I've been to a minority experience is living in China and visiting most countries in South East Asia and yes my wife is Chinese. In the 10 years when I lived in China I had only a couple bad experiences but again that was primarily because I was white if I had been brown or Black it would have been different. That's why I am looking forward to going to South Africa, Mozambique and Zimbabwe. My African friend will be taking us to the townships outside of Johannesburg which will be a new experience for both my wife and myself .While in Zimbabwe we are going to Victoria Falls I hope to see some people who have been ravaged by a corrupt society and leader. South Africa had the promise with Mandela but it has not lived up to that promise. I have been fortunate in my life to see much of the world but little in Africa other than Morocco and Algeria. This has been on my bucket list and hope it gives me a better understanding but will never allow me to truly understand.

I've had the idea of doing a small clothing manufacturing plant in either the Philippines and at my friends suggestion looking at South Africa. This is partially to give our daughters something to work at together but also help to be fair traders and manufacture quality clothing using linen, ethically cotton and hemp. While I want to help people it is still a business and utilize technology where it is better.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#864 » by gtn130 » Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:32 am

stilldropin20 wrote:trumps tax proposal is excellent.

Although it doesn't address my first order politics (which is to redistribute wealth from wealthy to the poor) it does factor in my second order politics (to stimulate the economy) via repatriating trillions of dollars and mainly US corporations to make the existing (feudal and therefore totalitarian) government at least more tolerable.


lmao
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,091
And1: 4,768
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#865 » by Zonkerbl » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:09 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/09/27/since-2013-minorities-and-americans-without-college-degrees-showed-greatest-gains-in-wealth-federal-reserve-report-shows/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_fedwealth-2p%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.27ab8c9671de

Speaking of that crosstab Nate submitted the other day.

"the median net worth of white households, at $171,000, was nearly 10 times larger than for black households."

I would imagine your net worth is also a predictor of violence, besides just income. Meh, I don't blame Nate for getting confused by the surprisingly important difference between income and wealth. You can put white people with the same income next to other minorities with the *same income* and the white people will, *on average* have more net wealth. So if net wealth is a predictor of violence, you can put whites and minorities with the same income together on a crosstab and the minorities will look "inherently more violent."

The moral of this story is don't jump to racist conclusions when a somewhat rigorous statistical analysis shows you what you are looking for. That's the difference between science and racism.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#866 » by Ruzious » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:43 am

stilldropin20 wrote:trumps tax proposal is excellent.

Although it doesn't address my first order politics (which is to redistribute wealth from wealthy to the poor) it does factor in my second order politics (to stimulate the economy) via repatriating trillions of dollars and mainly US corporations to make the existing (feudal and therefore totalitarian) government at least more tolerable.

You know that in past speeches, he's vowed to repeal the estate tax... in order to help farmers... lolololol... but it's true. The man is selfless as he is honest! None of his tax plan is to benefit him... no sir! It's to help his children and grandchildren. How else is Don, Jr gonna make ends meet, God love him.

Of course... repealing the estate tax is the polar opposite of redistributing wealth from wealthy to poor.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#867 » by cammac » Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:41 am

Ruzious wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:trumps tax proposal is excellent.

Although it doesn't address my first order politics (which is to redistribute wealth from wealthy to the poor) it does factor in my second order politics (to stimulate the economy) via repatriating trillions of dollars and mainly US corporations to make the existing (feudal and therefore totalitarian) government at least more tolerable.

You know that in past speeches, he's vowed to repeal the estate tax... in order to help farmers... lolololol... but it's true. The man is selfless as he is honest! None of his tax plan is to benefit him... no sir! It's to help his children and grandchildren. How else is Don, Jr gonna make ends meet, God love him.

Of course... repealing the estate tax is the polar opposite of redistributing wealth from wealthy to poor.


Excellent post!
Took a quick look at the overall proposal and it is quite a piece of work which should make the far right salivate with one huge exception in how it will be paid for? I presume it will" trickle down" like manna from Heaven! I guess "God" must have spoken to the "Big 6" and gave them the heavenly inspiration. While I'm not against the corporate rate going to 20% I didn't see any adjustments proposed for loopholes. The projected economic growth in the GDP in the USA was projected at 2.2% but with the 3 hurricanes I see the the 4th quarter being bad and likely lower the 3rd quarter somewhat. Speaking of the hurricanes Texas rebuild $150 Billion, $100 Billion Florida and likely $50 Billion for Puerto Rico where is that money coming from?
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,347
And1: 7,451
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#868 » by FAH1223 » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:32 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,144
And1: 20,595
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#869 » by dckingsfan » Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:08 pm

Here is how I (opinion) see the R tax plan being summarized - but it is way to early to understand what that tax plan will actually entail.

First, there is the three personal tax brackets: 12 percent, 25 percent and 35 percent - but we don't yet know where they fall (total income) or what if any deductions are being eliminated. At first pass, this isn't too bad - but if the same deductions stand - it isn't good either.

Second, there is the 35 percent to 20 percent reduction for corporations. Most will scream bloody murder on this - but it is actually reasonable against the world stage (you don't want to have the highest tax rate and push corporations away). Again, deductions count - let's see if any are eliminated.

Third, end the practice of taxing the foreign profits - this happens in no other country. The money just stays offshore and doesn't benefit US citizens. I see this as good.

Fourth, end Federal Estate Tax - not much to be said about this - just a carve out to the rich.

Fifth - end the Alternative Minimum Tax, probably not good? The problem was when it was enacted, there was no adjustment for inflation. (Peckron and signed by Nixon) made the point that the top income earners paid no income tax. The AMT changed that... it was a good idea but was poorly written. Folks like Trump pay no taxes without the AMT.

Sixth - what is unsaid is that the Rs, like the Ds before them don't simplify the tax code by reducing the deductions. Both parties see this as a political third rail. The problem is that this more than anything hurts receipts.

So, overall, IMO, it is an okay plan not a great plan. Elimination of Federal Estate taxes, elimination of the AMT and no plan to meaningfully address the elephant that is deductions gives it "C" for a grade.

I could see the elimination of Federal Estate taxes getting nuked in the negotiations. That would make it better. And an alternative to the AMT would make it even better (actually it would then be the best tax plan in the last 30+ years).

But there is still that elephant in the room... the carveouts from both the Ds and Rs that are problematic.
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,993
And1: 4,145
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#870 » by dobrojim » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:32 pm

(from the mouth of babes, copied from someone I know on FB)

Borrowed from my friend of a friend's FB... her son’s view"

Borrowed from my friend of a friend's FB... her son’s view"
Sam, age 15 "Mom, I don't understand the outrage over people taking a knee. It's actually the most patriotic thing one can do when our anthem plays right now."

I asked him to explain his train of thought.

"My coach taught me you take a knee when a player is down from any team. You do it as a sign of respect and send energy to that player that he can not only get up, but not have an injury that he can't overcome. You're thanking him for a game hard played and hope he can join it soon. Both teams want the game to begin again, knowing their players are going to be ok and united in a show of comaraderie.

Anyone with half a brain knows our country is injured, we have people down. It's time for all sides to take a knee and focus their energy on helping the injured so the game can go on. Our team, the U.S., is actually disrespectful if we stand and cheer while we have players down. I love my team, I care for its players. When the anthem plays I will take a knee and send energy to healing so that the team can play on."
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#871 » by Ruzious » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:57 pm

Are there going to be bipartisan negotiations? If so, they might get it passed IF (and only if) they leave out the elimination of the estate tax. The timing - when the gap between wealthy and poor is so great - makes it a non-starter, imo.

And a good thing to add in the bill that would get Dem votes and probably make a lot of Republicans happy: the President must immediately make public his last 3 income tax returns - at minimum. Make it an extra year for every month after elected that he/she does not provide them. And if he doesn't provide them by a certain date, the IRS Commissioner will be required to make them public.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#872 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:03 pm

dckingsfan wrote:Here is how I (opinion) see the R tax plan being summarized - but it is way to early to understand what that tax plan will actually entail.

First, there is the three personal tax brackets: 12 percent, 25 percent and 35 percent - but we don't yet know where they fall (total income) or what if any deductions are being eliminated. At first pass, this isn't too bad - but if the same deductions stand - it isn't good either.

Second, there is the 35 percent to 20 percent reduction for corporations. Most will scream bloody murder on this - but it is actually reasonable against the world stage (you don't want to have the highest tax rate and push corporations away). Again, deductions count - let's see if any are eliminated.

Third, end the practice of taxing the foreign profits - this happens in no other country. The money just stays offshore and doesn't benefit US citizens. I see this as good.

Fourth, end Federal Estate Tax - not much to be said about this - just a carve out to the rich.

Fifth - end the Alternative Minimum Tax, probably not good? The problem was when it was enacted, there was no adjustment for inflation. (Peckron and signed by Nixon) made the point that the top income earners paid no income tax. The AMT changed that... it was a good idea but was poorly written. Folks like Trump pay no taxes without the AMT.

Sixth - what is unsaid is that the Rs, like the Ds before them don't simplify the tax code by reducing the deductions. Both parties see this as a political third rail. The problem is that this more than anything hurts receipts.

So, overall, IMO, it is an okay plan not a great plan. Elimination of Federal Estate taxes, elimination of the AMT and no plan to meaningfully address the elephant that is deductions gives it "C" for a grade.

I could see the elimination of Federal Estate taxes getting nuked in the negotiations. That would make it better. And an alternative to the AMT would make it even better (actually it would then be the best tax plan in the last 30+ years).

But there is still that elephant in the room... the carveouts from both the Ds and Rs that are problematic.


its a pretty damn awesome tax plan. tbh.

the best part imo is small business pass corp (ch-s) pay 25% instead of 39% (over 75K-haven't looked in a while...might have gone up to 100-118k) But still. why should large business pay 20% and small business pay 39%? Trump gets it.

If You truly believe in capitalism and you are posting in these pages then you have to love that right there. Any independent "mom and pop" contractor that "works" for himself essentially sets up his bus as an s-corp if he has even half a brain cell. This is huge tax break for them. protecting small businesses should be the heart and soul of any "american first" tax plan. Why protect big bus and not small? The mom n pop business is almost dead in america, all prey to large business. even small dive bars and sandwich shops like potbelly and cafes's like starbucks have fully infiltrated americana as "good." all behind the big capital of investment bankers who take and make the lion's share of those businesses. of course the founder generally end up "rich" too. But that's not what this country was suppose to be about. I'd rather 5000 different families own their own cafe across america than 1 family owning all 5000 with goldman sachs actually owning 85% of the corp. and the profits.

thats a huge win for the american people.

also the no tax below $24K (currently 10%) if married is intended to "encourage family values" again. Poor people will surivive the thrive better, together. $24K is the national average amount of entitlements a single mother with 1 child would receive. so she is disincentivised to work if she makes less than 24K. add to this the work Ivanka is attempting to accomplish for mom's and single moms where day care is provided for free for working mom's. Combine the tax relief plus incentive to be married and the day care for children and maybe this new tax legislation can begin to help repair the "family" in our poorest communities. Instead of just a typical entitlement for not working, sitting at home, having kids.


It does not really matter where 12,25,35% cuttoffs are. because the old brackets of 27-34% was right around 30-55K. so who cares? 25 is better than 27 so its going to be better than that. top end 39.6 down to 35 helps but this aint really a big deal to those making 200K and up. they save $8k is merely a jesture but doesn't change their lives. the big help is when you combine it with the s-corp pass through reduciton down to 25%. especially given that most people over 300K own their own business (s-corp) which their corp can now retain assets (unrealized on personal income) and the actual tax will be 25%. Huge!!!! maybe we can afford obama care for their employees now and its 5-10K deductables? just sayin.

what we will find happening is more and more people are going to request to be hired as independent contractors to take advantage of the 25% pass through bracket which will ease the burden on the employer(big bus or small) and the what would have been w-2 employee.

I mean...everyone is getting a tax brake. Nobody's taxes went up!!!! is there a single far left destroy trump at all costs liberal on here that doesn't like this? if you like to keep your own money you should be calling your reps and senators right now and telling them to get on board with this plan.


in terms of getting rid of inheritance tax. as you guys should know. I'm against it wholly and fully. I made proposals 2 pages back to seize all that wealth and didn't get a single and-1 and infact got called stupid. so you guys dont want to "take" the wealth back anyway. You accept things the way they are. I dont. but if the majority does. then this tax proposal is down right amazing. to everyone. everyone benefits. and if this gets cut out in congress even better.

and dont even make the argument about what this tax brake is going to cost. health care costs money too. so does education. so do entitlement. everything. Obama just spent 10 trillion in 8 years. I got told on these pages we "cant seize the oil." we cant "seize the wealth" back from the wealthy. we cant take back the gold. we cant nationalize the banks... so in essence we are going to continue to run up negative balance sheets and be in debt forever. If thats the case, you may as well give us some of our own money back in the form of tax relief each year before all of us that are capable, move to switzerland or new zealand.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,829
And1: 9,217
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#873 » by payitforward » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:04 pm

gtn130 wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:trumps tax proposal is excellent.

Although it doesn't address my first order politics (which is to redistribute wealth from wealthy to the poor) it does factor in my second order politics (to stimulate the economy) via repatriating trillions of dollars and mainly US corporations to make the existing (feudal and therefore totalitarian) government at least more tolerable.

lmao

Me too.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#874 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:10 pm

cammac wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:trumps tax proposal is excellent.

Although it doesn't address my first order politics (which is to redistribute wealth from wealthy to the poor) it does factor in my second order politics (to stimulate the economy) via repatriating trillions of dollars and mainly US corporations to make the existing (feudal and therefore totalitarian) government at least more tolerable.

You know that in past speeches, he's vowed to repeal the estate tax... in order to help farmers... lolololol... but it's true. The man is selfless as he is honest! None of his tax plan is to benefit him... no sir! It's to help his children and grandchildren. How else is Don, Jr gonna make ends meet, God love him.

Of course... repealing the estate tax is the polar opposite of redistributing wealth from wealthy to poor.


Excellent post!
Took a quick look at the overall proposal and it is quite a piece of work which should make the far right salivate with one huge exception in how it will be paid for? I presume it will" trickle down" like manna from Heaven! I guess "God" must have spoken to the "Big 6" and gave them the heavenly inspiration. While I'm not against the corporate rate going to 20% I didn't see any adjustments proposed for loopholes. The projected economic growth in the GDP in the USA was projected at 2.2% but with the 3 hurricanes I see the the 4th quarter being bad and likely lower the 3rd quarter somewhat. Speaking of the hurricanes Texas rebuild $150 Billion, $100 Billion Florida and likely $50 Billion for Puerto Rico where is that money coming from?


we just spent 10 trillion in 8 years. why do we even care what anything costs anymore?? seriously. everyone gets to keep some(if not a lot) of their own hard earned money who cares what it costs?

Here's a thought. the debt has doubled at a rate of almost every 8 years for the past almost 30 years. let's assume Trump is no different and we are staring at 40Trillion in debt when he leaves office. would ya like to have some of your own money along the way??

cuz the inevitable is coming. At some point the debt will be so insurmountable that the US government is going to have to print their own money (again as it has in the past eg. greenbacks) and face mass devalution of the dollar as well destablize the entire world markets. But still its inevitable. we are never going to be able ot pay it back without seizing it from the wealthy bankers or seizing the oil. Its just not possible. So since we are going tho 40trillion anyway how about we keep some of our own money along the way??
like i said, its a full rebuild.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,202
And1: 24,502
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#875 » by Pointgod » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:23 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter


The biggest trick that Republicans ever pulled was convincing people that they're the party of fiscal responsibility. The Republican party ethos is tax cuts for the rich, that's it. It's amazing the American people think that putting these clowns in charge of government will push America in the right direction.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#876 » by Ruzious » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:41 pm

stilldropin20 wrote:
cammac wrote:
Ruzious wrote:You know that in past speeches, he's vowed to repeal the estate tax... in order to help farmers... lolololol... but it's true. The man is selfless as he is honest! None of his tax plan is to benefit him... no sir! It's to help his children and grandchildren. How else is Don, Jr gonna make ends meet, God love him.

Of course... repealing the estate tax is the polar opposite of redistributing wealth from wealthy to poor.


Excellent post!
Took a quick look at the overall proposal and it is quite a piece of work which should make the far right salivate with one huge exception in how it will be paid for? I presume it will" trickle down" like manna from Heaven! I guess "God" must have spoken to the "Big 6" and gave them the heavenly inspiration. While I'm not against the corporate rate going to 20% I didn't see any adjustments proposed for loopholes. The projected economic growth in the GDP in the USA was projected at 2.2% but with the 3 hurricanes I see the the 4th quarter being bad and likely lower the 3rd quarter somewhat. Speaking of the hurricanes Texas rebuild $150 Billion, $100 Billion Florida and likely $50 Billion for Puerto Rico where is that money coming from?


we just spent 10 trillion in 8 years. why do we even care what anything costs anymore?? seriously. everyone gets to keep some(if not a lot) of their own hard earned money who cares what it costs?

Here's a thought. the debt has doubled at a rate of almost every 8 years for the past almost 30 years. let's assume Trump is no different and we are staring at 40Trillion in debt when he leaves office. would ya like to have some of your own money along the way??

cuz the inevitable is coming. At some point the debt will be so insurmountable that the US government is going to have to print their own money (again as it has in the past eg. greenbacks) and face mass devalution of the dollar as well destablize the entire world markets. But still its inevitable. we are never going to be able ot pay it back without seizing it from the wealthy bankers or seizing the oil. Its just not possible. So since we are going tho 40trillion anyway how about we keep some of our own money along the way??

I'm guessing you don't have any kids or neices or nephews. Or you hate them.

If it's inevitable, it's from passing irresponsible tax breaks and paying for wars that we never should have gotten involved in - as well as not making smart decisions on what spending cuts should be made. And it's from focussing more on repealing any progress previous administrations made rather than making things better.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,504
And1: 2,787
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#877 » by Kanyewest » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:55 pm

Middle class will 'get nothing' in tax proposal: Rattner http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/middle-class-will-get-nothing-in-tax-proposal-rattner-1056879683675

With the new tax cuts Trump is proposing the debt will be larger than the US GDP by 2027.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,504
And1: 2,787
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#878 » by Kanyewest » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:58 pm

bsilver
Rookie
Posts: 1,103
And1: 592
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Location: New Haven, CT

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#879 » by bsilver » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:22 pm

stilldropin20 wrote:trumps tax proposal is excellent.

Although it doesn't address my first order politics (which is to redistribute wealth from wealthy to the poor) it does factor in my second order politics (to stimulate the economy) via repatriating trillions of dollars and mainly US corporations to make the existing (feudal and therefore totalitarian) government at least more tolerable.

Scene 1 - About a 1000 years ago at the castle of Baron von Drumpf
Baron to his trusted advisor Herr Drupenzwanzig: "I should be happy. The serfs have to give me almost everything they grow, and I grab all of their pussy I want. But I still want more, and I want them to love me too. It's not fair. They should be grateful for all I do for them.
Herr Drupenzwanzig: "Well, I have some ideas. Back in Pullman when I was a boy...."
Baron: "Stop, stop. I've heard that 20 times already. Just make it happen.

Scene 2 - 6 months later
Baron: "How did you do it Herr Drupenzwanzig? Serf production is way up, and they love me. And the young pussy - wow."
Herr Drupenzwanzig: "Just watch what's happening in the courtyard".
Baron: "Why are they stoning Feinberg the butcher, and Cohen the tailor. And why are Feinberg and Cohen dressed in suits and tophats?
Drupenzwanzig: "I told the serfs the real story. Feinberg and Cohen are international bankers charging you exorbitant interest rates. That's why the serfs had to work so hard. To pay off your loans.
Baron: "Why are they kicking and beating those gypsies?"
Drupenzwanzig: "The serfs now know the truth. Gypsies are lazy dishonest rapists. The serfs had to work harder because the gypsies weren't producing, and that you had to take the young serf girls to the castle to protect them from the gypsies".
Baron: "You're brilliant Herr Drupenzwanzig."
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics — quote popularized by Mark Twain.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,347
And1: 7,451
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#880 » by FAH1223 » Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:43 pm

Pointgod wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter


The biggest trick that Republicans ever pulled was convincing people that they're the party of fiscal responsibility. The Republican party ethos is tax cuts for the rich, that's it. It's amazing the American people think that putting these clowns in charge of government will push America in the right direction.

Read on Twitter
Image

Return to Washington Wizards