
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Illuminaire wrote:Dear heavens. Beal at 25 million a year.
Someone save this franchise from itself.
Wizardspride wrote:Illuminaire wrote:Dear heavens. Beal at 25 million a year.
Someone save this franchise from itself.
Honestly, what's the alternative?
This is the "new NBA".
Illuminaire wrote:Wizardspride wrote:Illuminaire wrote:Dear heavens. Beal at 25 million a year.
Someone save this franchise from itself.
Honestly, what's the alternative?
This is the "new NBA".
The alternative is to wait and let the market set his price, because you can always match. And if he gets that kind of deal, when he's worth maybe half that, you sign someone else instead.
Making a bad decisions just to make a decision does not get you closer to building a contender.
Illuminaire wrote:Sure, but what impact free agents are even looking the Wizard's way?
The opportunity cost is negligible if you're signing Beal to a contract even remotely close to his actual value. And there's only a chance that happens to begin with.
Wizardspride wrote:Illuminaire wrote:Dear heavens. Beal at 25 million a year.
Someone save this franchise from itself.
Honestly, what's the alternative?
This is the "new NBA".
80sballboy wrote:Illuminaire wrote:Sure, but what impact free agents are even looking the Wizard's way?
The opportunity cost is negligible if you're signing Beal to a contract even remotely close to his actual value. And there's only a chance that happens to begin with.
Yeah, let's wait until somebody offers him his value. You know, like Mozgov getting $16M a year from the idiot Lakers, Noah probably getting $17M from the Knicks, Parsons likely getting the max with no healthy knees from Portland. Sure, Beal at 23, is probably getting less than those guys. Right.
There are only a few impact free agents out there and we're probably getting neither. Now it's time to be creative which is difficult for this FO.
Illuminaire wrote:80sballboy wrote:Illuminaire wrote:Sure, but what impact free agents are even looking the Wizard's way?
The opportunity cost is negligible if you're signing Beal to a contract even remotely close to his actual value. And there's only a chance that happens to begin with.
Yeah, let's wait until somebody offers him his value. You know, like Mozgov getting $16M a year from the idiot Lakers, Noah probably getting $17M from the Knicks, Parsons likely getting the max with no healthy knees from Portland. Sure, Beal at 23, is probably getting less than those guys. Right.
There are only a few impact free agents out there and we're probably getting neither. Now it's time to be creative which is difficult for this FO.
Then you let him walk. This isn't that hard to understand. You can't put together a quality team if you wildly overpay injury prone, replacement level players.

E.G. Resigns? <insert spit take here>gtn130 wrote:So what's the plan when we strike out on the top three tiers of players?
Wizardspride wrote:stevemcqueen1 wrote:I read that we're going to sign Beal to a max deal as soon as midnight rolls around.
I could be wrong, but doesn't that unnecessarily change his cap commitment from the ~15 million dollar hold to a 22 million dollar hold? So we're essentially giving up 7 million in cap space to use at the beginning of FA for no reason? Moreoever, we're going to offer Beal a max deal without waiting for someone else to do it first, knowing that we can match??
They didn't say were signing him to a deal right away.
We're going to agree to a deal right away.
It's basically just to keep him from signing an offer sheet with another team and lessen our cap space.
stevemcqueen1 wrote:**** this FA market. Just sit it out. Make trades for guys who signed extensions last summer and the summer before. Beal's max deal is enough of an albatross contract for one summer. All of these agreements struck during the moratorium are going to be horrible.