ImageImageImageImageImage

Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 17,103
And1: 4,211
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#921 » by dobrojim » Thu Feb 3, 2011 9:47 pm

DCZards wrote:
JonathanJoseph wrote:
Except, as I've tried to point out repeatedly, there lies the possibility of taking what's behind door number 3, which is any other trade that would have become available.

And a number of your points are extremely debatable or wrong.



Door number 3? Do you really think there was going to be a door number 3? EG was wise to move quickly on the trade with Orlando and not wait around "hoping" that a better trade was around the corner. I seriously doubt that it was.

I'm a Gil fan and would have LOVED to see him and Wall tear it up together. I, maybe foolishly, envisioned Gil and Wall forming one of the top backcourts in the NBA.

But now I have to give Ernie G. props for the trade because I believe, for reasons others have pointed out, it favors the Zards in several ways. Plus, Gil more and more appears to be washed up, while Lewis, if the Zards are looking to trade him, probably holds considerable appeal to some playoff-bound teams, which could reap the Zards cap space, young talent, a decent draft pick---or all three.


+1

I really thought that the Gil of last year (22ppg7asst) could combine with Wall to
form a dynamic and top level backcourt. In retrospect, I was an idiot.
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
barelyawake
Head Coach
Posts: 6,099
And1: 685
Joined: Aug 07, 2004

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#922 » by barelyawake » Thu Feb 3, 2011 9:47 pm

Great interview. I still miss Gil. He said his problems in Orlando have been due alot to cold weather stiffening him up. He expects to breakout soon. We shall see. I'll always be cheering for him.
AceDegenerate
Banned User
Posts: 4,852
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 01, 2002

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#923 » by AceDegenerate » Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:06 pm

dobrojim wrote:
DCZards wrote:
JonathanJoseph wrote:
Except, as I've tried to point out repeatedly, there lies the possibility of taking what's behind door number 3, which is any other trade that would have become available.

And a number of your points are extremely debatable or wrong.



Door number 3? Do you really think there was going to be a door number 3? EG was wise to move quickly on the trade with Orlando and not wait around "hoping" that a better trade was around the corner. I seriously doubt that it was.

I'm a Gil fan and would have LOVED to see him and Wall tear it up together. I, maybe foolishly, envisioned Gil and Wall forming one of the top backcourts in the NBA.

But now I have to give Ernie G. props for the trade because I believe, for reasons others have pointed out, it favors the Zards in several ways. Plus, Gil more and more appears to be washed up, while Lewis, if the Zards are looking to trade him, probably holds considerable appeal to some playoff-bound teams, which could reap the Zards cap space, young talent, a decent draft pick---or all three.


+1

I really thought that the Gil of last year (22ppg7asst) could combine with Wall to
form a dynamic and top level backcourt. In retrospect, I was an idiot.


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9qM52TflA0[/youtube]
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#925 » by JonathanJoseph » Sun Feb 6, 2011 6:38 pm

DCZards wrote:
JonathanJoseph wrote:
Except, as I've tried to point out repeatedly, there lies the possibility of taking what's behind door number 3, which is any other trade that would have become available.

And a number of your points are extremely debatable or wrong.



Door number 3? Do you really think there was going to be a door number 3? EG was wise to move quickly on the trade with Orlando and not wait around "hoping" that a better trade was around the corner. I seriously doubt that it was.

I'm a Gil fan and would have LOVED to see him and Wall tear it up together. I, maybe foolishly, envisioned Gil and Wall forming one of the top backcourts in the NBA.

But now I have to give Ernie G. props for the trade because I believe, for reasons others have pointed out, it favors the Zards in several ways. Plus, Gil more and more appears to be washed up, while Lewis, if the Zards are looking to trade him, probably holds considerable appeal to some playoff-bound teams, which could reap the Zards cap space, young talent, a decent draft pick---or all three.


My mind is still blown that everyone is so sure that there wouldn't be a door number 3. We already know there was a door number 3 in the form of a Stephen Jackson deal. No one can say with confidence what options there would be in a year (when there would be $17M less owed to Arenas). The only thing that would have prevented options from presenting themselves would have been a new knee injury.

There is NO WAY Arenas will play this poorly through the life of his contract. It's one thing to decline, it's another thing to have your PER drop 50% in one year. Arenas is mentally fragile, as we all know, and he was thrown under the bus by his former boss (costing him his legacy and $30M-$50M) and he's involved in a messy domestic situation with the mother of his kids who kicked him out of his own house. These situations would affect the performance of ANYONE much less someone like Arenas.

If you think Arenas isn't the player he was before, that's fine, but there really isn't a precedent or rational reason to believe that Arenas is barely more than 50% of the player he was last season. Tracy McGrady and Grant Hill are the two most relevant comparisons and neither had anything close to the precipitous drop in PER Arenas has had in the last 12 months or over the course of their careers. You can't just become a bad player overnight.
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,835
And1: 7,965
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#926 » by montestewart » Sun Feb 6, 2011 7:09 pm

^
Well, in honor of Reagan's centennial, I'll offer, "There you go again."

The argument: "There's no way you can be certain of [fill in the blank] but I am certain of [fill in the blank]" will win every time, unless you have to prove it to people that are not already convinced, and since you can't in this case, it's a weak argument. We can never know what deals might have been on the table in the future, and even potential contemporaneous deals are difficult to ascertain, clouded by rumors and reliability of sources. Think of all the deals we hear about every day. Are all those real deals? As far as Arenas' future performance, even if he busts out and comes back strong, it doesn't really prove much, because that deal likely was made knowing there was a possibility that he would come back. Keeping him, dealing him, it was a gamble either way. There was no certainty, just a decision to move on. Arenas seems happier in Orlando. Why keep him here if he was miserable?

[The author requests that responses not embellish upon the author's stated positions, conflate them with other authors' stated positions, quote out of context so as to distort the author's intent, or engage in ad hominem attacks disconnected from positions stated in the author's posts. Thank you. The author.]

PS: Hill gets about 3 million, and McGrady gets the league minimum. Both deals expire this year. I don't think it's all about perceived ability, now or in the future.
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#927 » by JonathanJoseph » Sun Feb 6, 2011 9:07 pm

montestewart wrote:^
Well, in honor of Reagan's centennial, I'll offer, "There you go again."

The argument: "There's no way you can be certain of [fill in the blank] but I am certain of [fill in the blank]" will win every time, unless you have to prove it to people that are not already convinced, and since you can't in this case, it's a weak argument. We can never know what deals might have been on the table in the future, and even potential contemporaneous deals are difficult to ascertain, clouded by rumors and reliability of sources. Think of all the deals we hear about every day. Are all those real deals? As far as Arenas' future performance, even if he busts out and comes back strong, it doesn't really prove much, because that deal likely was made knowing there was a possibility that he would come back. Keeping him, dealing him, it was a gamble either way. There was no certainty, just a decision to move on. Arenas seems happier in Orlando. Why keep him here if he was miserable?

[The author requests that responses not embellish upon the author's stated positions, conflate them with other authors' stated positions, quote out of context so as to distort the author's intent, or engage in ad hominem attacks disconnected from positions stated in the author's posts. Thank you. The author.]

PS: Hill gets about 3 million, and McGrady gets the league minimum. Both deals expire this year. I don't think it's all about perceived ability, now or in the future.

Except I'm the one using facts and historical precedent in my argument.

Facts and historical precedent suggest it's highly likely Arenas will improve significantly above his currnt level of play. of course it's a gamble, every business move is a gamble.

So it's more than fair to question whether "selling low" was wise.
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,863
And1: 3,581
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#928 » by Rafael122 » Sun Feb 6, 2011 10:12 pm

He looks awful. Seriously. It's in Orlando's best interest to sit him out for a couple of weeks to see if he can get healthy, because Arenas doesn't even look like an NBA player right now. No burst, no burst whatsoever.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,835
And1: 7,965
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#929 » by montestewart » Sun Feb 6, 2011 10:32 pm

JonathanJoseph wrote:There is NO WAY Arenas will play this poorly through the life of his contract.

JonathanJoseph wrote:Facts and historical precedent suggest it's highly likely Arenas will improve significantly above his currnt level of play.

Do you see the difference between these two statements? It's not a subtle one. Even nate33, Nivek, etc., pinning down probabilities, usually call them strong likelihoods rather than certainties, and post their numbers to back up the arguments. Show a clear, logical argument, and support it with statistical analysis. I doubt you'd sway me, but I've been wrong enough in the past to be open to a good argument.

This is fun, and I admire your passion.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,570
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#930 » by LyricalRico » Mon Feb 7, 2011 1:52 am

Rafael122 wrote:He looks awful. Seriously. It's in Orlando's best interest to sit him out for a couple of weeks to see if he can get healthy, because Arenas doesn't even look like an NBA player right now. No burst, no burst whatsoever.


:nod:

Yep, they need to shut him down and see if he can get healthy. At least Duhon can give them defense.
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,863
And1: 3,581
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#931 » by Rafael122 » Mon Feb 7, 2011 2:21 am

Even reading some posts on the Orlando board, they're like a) can they get Lewis back or b) how the hell are we going to keep this guy on board for 4 years and $60 million?

I read he got served custody papers during halftime of the Heat/Magic game the other night. WOW.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#932 » by JonathanJoseph » Mon Feb 7, 2011 8:37 am

montestewart wrote:
JonathanJoseph wrote:There is NO WAY Arenas will play this poorly through the life of his contract.

JonathanJoseph wrote:Facts and historical precedent suggest it's highly likely Arenas will improve significantly above his currnt level of play.

Do you see the difference between these two statements? It's not a subtle one. Even nate33, Nivek, etc., pinning down probabilities, usually call them strong likelihoods rather than certainties, and post their numbers to back up the arguments. Show a clear, logical argument, and support it with statistical analysis. I doubt you'd sway me, but I've been wrong enough in the past to be open to a good argument.

This is fun, and I admire your passion.


You are absolutely right. I've mixed metaphors, so to speak, here.

In one instance I used "highly unlikely" and the other time used "NO WAY". It's tough to assign a literal number to it because it's very subjective. But when I say "no way", I'm referring to what I'd consider to be a 95% likelihood, based on historical precedent. When you look at the other players who have been perennial all-stars (or high quality NBA players) who have had their careers derailed by injury and the respective drops in PER there is simply no precedent for how bad Arenas is playing right now.

Arenas is a career ~20 PER player. Arenas' post knee injuries PER is about 18. Arenas play with Orlando is 10 PER, so his PER has declined by about 50% in 1 season. There is simply no precedent for this.

    Bill Walton's career high PER was 24 and it never got below 17 in his worst year.

    Tracy McGrady had one ridiculous year (30 PER), but otherwise hovered around 20-25 PER during his peak and then he had a steady drop to 18.4 ('07), 16.3 ('08), 16.3 ('09), and 12.2 ('10) (and it's gone up to 14 since).

    Grant Hill was a 24-25 PER player before he got hurt, but he was still a 19-20 PER player when he finally got back to playing and had his worst season last year at 14 PER. His single biggest drop in any year was from 24 to 18.

    Allen Iverson's last 4 years in the NBA included a decline of 19.6, 20.9, 15.8, to 13.4.

    Ironically (and more to the point about the existence of the curse of Lez Boulez), Caron Butler has had one of this biggest PER declines going from 20.7 ('07), 18.7 ('08), 13.3 ('09).

    The most injury prone players in the NBA today are Michael Redd (PER declines of 22.3 in '07, 18.8 in '08, 17.9 in '09, 12.1 in '10) and Yao Ming (his career PER peaked at 25 and still has never dropped below 20).

There just isn't a rational precedent for a 3-time all-star to go from a steady 18-19 PER to the 10 PER he's been with Orlando over the span of <12 months without injury. Arenas is years removed from his last knee surgery and he's missed about 3 games due to injury over the past 70-80 games so health wouldn't be a valid reason.

I don't have a concrete answer as to why Arenas is playing like a mediocre NBA player but I know that based on history I wouldn't bet Rashard Lewis' contract on Arenas being the worst decline of any player in NBA history. And if it is, then the Wizards were screwed (and cursed) either way.
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,765
And1: 4,602
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#933 » by closg00 » Mon Feb 7, 2011 11:08 am

Gil missed all of his shots yesterday :noway:
leswizards
Rookie
Posts: 1,017
And1: 289
Joined: Jun 09, 2010

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#934 » by leswizards » Mon Feb 7, 2011 3:37 pm

JonathanJoseph wrote:There just isn't a rational precedent for a 3-time all-star to go from a steady 18-19 PER to the 10 PER he's been with Orlando over the span of <12 months without injury. Arenas is years removed from his last knee surgery and he's missed about 3 games due to injury over the past 70-80 games so health wouldn't be a valid reason.

I don't have a concrete answer as to why Arenas is playing like a mediocre NBA player but I know that based on history I wouldn't bet Rashard Lewis' contract on Arenas being the worst decline of any player in NBA history. And if it is, then the Wizards were screwed (and cursed) either way.


The problem with your argument is that Gil was a 16 per PG with the Wizards. So, he really was not that very far from being the player you think he is, yet the best offer they could get for him was Rashard Lewis. The reason is as many posters have told you over and over again, there simply were no teams that want an veteran injury prone PG making $60+ million over the next 3 seasons, regardless of the fact that he is capable of being an 18 per PG.

Part of the reason that Gil's per is so low this season is that to get significant minutes he has to play SG which he has been incapable of doing effectively. So, basically you wanted to keep Gil and have him play significant minutes at the point so he could drive up his per, while John Wall would languish on the bench.

As far as I am concerned, no thank you, we got a better deal in landing Rashard.
Viva le tank! At this pace, it will never end.
leswizards
Rookie
Posts: 1,017
And1: 289
Joined: Jun 09, 2010

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#935 » by leswizards » Mon Feb 7, 2011 3:42 pm

Rafael122 wrote:Even reading some posts on the Orlando board, they're like a) can they get Lewis back ...


As far as I am concerned, they can have Rashard back... that is just as long as we don't have to take Gil back.
Viva le tank! At this pace, it will never end.
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#936 » by JonathanJoseph » Mon Feb 7, 2011 6:41 pm

leswizards wrote:
JonathanJoseph wrote:There just isn't a rational precedent for a 3-time all-star to go from a steady 18-19 PER to the 10 PER he's been with Orlando over the span of <12 months without injury. Arenas is years removed from his last knee surgery and he's missed about 3 games due to injury over the past 70-80 games so health wouldn't be a valid reason.

I don't have a concrete answer as to why Arenas is playing like a mediocre NBA player but I know that based on history I wouldn't bet Rashard Lewis' contract on Arenas being the worst decline of any player in NBA history. And if it is, then the Wizards were screwed (and cursed) either way.


The problem with your argument is that Gil was a 16 per PG with the Wizards. So, he really was not that very far from being the player you think he is, yet the best offer they could get for him was Rashard Lewis. The reason is as many posters have told you over and over again, there simply were no teams that want an veteran injury prone PG making $60+ million over the next 3 seasons, regardless of the fact that he is capable of being an 18 per PG.

Part of the reason that Gil's per is so low this season is that to get significant minutes he has to play SG which he has been incapable of doing effectively. So, basically you wanted to keep Gil and have him play significant minutes at the point so he could drive up his per, while John Wall would languish on the bench.

As far as I am concerned, no thank you, we got a better deal in landing Rashard.


But you seem to be missing the point, which is that given another season of playing his way through his struggles, he probably brings his PER back up to 16-18 and is only owed ~$40M, which surely raises his trade value and opens up new options.

Rashard Lewis' PER with the Wizards is 14.4 and that's simply not good enough for a guy taking up 38% of your salary cap. Arguing whether or not it's an improvement now over the current version of Arenas isn't quite the point.
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
Donkey McDonkerton
General Manager
Posts: 9,189
And1: 411
Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Location: Donkieville
     

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#937 » by Donkey McDonkerton » Mon Feb 7, 2011 6:48 pm

Arenas has always been my favorite, and I want him to do well....it sucks but he just flat out doesn't look good.
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 17,103
And1: 4,211
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#938 » by dobrojim » Mon Feb 7, 2011 7:01 pm

a shadow of his former self
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,944
And1: 9,328
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#939 » by queridiculo » Mon Feb 7, 2011 7:23 pm

JonathanJoseph wrote:Rashard Lewis' PER with the Wizards is 14.4 and that's simply not good enough for a guy taking up 38% of your salary cap. Arguing whether or not it's an improvement now over the current version of Arenas isn't quite the point.


So exactly what is your point, it seems rather elusive.

From my perspective it's pretty simply, if we're wasting a roster spot and salary cap room, we might as well do it for a player that is a better fit and has a shorter contract.

End of story.
leswizards
Rookie
Posts: 1,017
And1: 289
Joined: Jun 09, 2010

Re: Arenas Traded for Rashard Lewis 

Post#940 » by leswizards » Mon Feb 7, 2011 7:24 pm

JonathanJoseph wrote:
leswizards wrote:The problem with your argument is that Gil was a 16 per PG with the Wizards.


But you seem to be missing the point, which is that given another season of playing his way through his struggles, he probably brings his PER back up to 16-18 and is only owed ~$40M, which surely raises his trade value and opens up new options.


No, you are the one that is missing the point. Gil was already a 16 per PG with the Wizards, and he had no trade value. Getting him up to 18 would not have added all that much. Furthermore, since Gil is so unproductive as a SG, the only way to get him up to an 18 per overall is to play him exclusively as a PG which means Wall languishes on the bench.

Why won't you acknowledge that keeping Gil means Wall has to languish on the bench so that Gil can play his way to an 18 per and up his trade value?
Viva le tank! At this pace, it will never end.

Return to Washington Wizards